• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

It's Official

GDViking said:
Well he is a clown who would be picking pockets if he had not been born with money.
Click to expand...

He's picked pockets in spite of being born into money. Even the elderly aren't off limits. See 'Trump University' scandal for validation.
 
GDViking said:
So what you are saying is trump pleads guilty...

I'm sure he is happy you're not his lawyer!

Although from what I have seen his are not much better...
Click to expand...

Nobody stated that. And you know it.

Trump asked Zelenski to investigate Biden and he says he has every right to do it as president

Trump told his staff not to submit to any Congressional subpoenas and he says he has every right to

Now that we cleared that up, and you only have two charges against Trump

What are all these witnesses going to testify too since Trump isn't denying what he did?
 
GDViking said:
Well he is a clown who would be picking pockets if he had not been born with money.
Click to expand...

Really, picking pockets? I've always pictured him more of a male pole dancer in a men's club.

85176159.jpg
 
Condor060 said:
Obstruction of Congress
Abuse of power for asking Zelenski to investigate Biden
Click to expand...

Guilty on both counts, but the kangaroo court,aka the Republican dominated Senate, will most certainly put party/self interests before love of country, and give POTUS a free pass. Of course, that free pass won't change the 'fact' his legacy wil bel his 'impeachment.' That's one thing that doesn't get lost in a 3 day media cycle. In that regard, some semblance of justice has already been served. Feel free to fire off a letter of gratitude to the House and Pelosi for said justice.
 
Logician Man said:
Nice to hear you, totally unsolicited, confess you are thrilled to have a joke as America's Commander-in-Chief. That certainly will help the American populace sleep well at night....especially our brave men and women who put their lives in harm's way tp protect and defend our freedoms and ways of life.
Click to expand...

Please read my post slowly and get back to me.
 
Condor060 said:
Nobody stated that. And you know it.

Trump asked Zelenski to investigate Biden and he says he has every right to do it as president

Trump told his staff not to submit to any Congressional subpoenas and he says he has every right to

Now that we cleared that up, and you only have two charges against Trump

What are all these witnesses going to testify too since Trump isn't denying what he did?
Click to expand...

It only takes one charge to impeach. In that regard, seeing as his Presidency is forever tarnished, some justice has already come to pass.
 
Logician Man said:
It only takes one charge to impeach. In that regard, seeing as his Presidency is forever tarnished, some justice has already come to pass.
Click to expand...

Are you joking? No republicans participated in helping the democrats. So it is a stupid act by Democrats.

I have yet to read any Democrat saying Clinton is forever tarnished.
 
Logician Man said:
Guilty on both counts, but the kangaroo court,aka the Republican dominated Senate, will most certainly put party/self interests before love of country, and give POTUS a free pass. Of course, that free pass won't change the 'fact' his legacy wil bel his 'impeachment.' That's one thing that doesn't get lost in a 3 day media cycle. In that regard, some semblance of justice has already been served. Feel free to fire off a letter of gratitude to the House and Pelosi for said justice.
Click to expand...

The only legacy Pelosi has accomplished

First impeachment in history that is completely partisan
First impeachment in history that doesn't have a single witness who can testify to the articles
First impeachment in history with all charges acquitted
First impeachment in history that refused opposing witnesses
First impeachment in history that refused to allow opposing party minority day
First impeachment in history that doesn't even have a criminal charge

What a bag of baboons
 
Robertinfremont said:
Are you joking? No republicans participated in helping the democrats. So it is a stupid act by Democrats.

I have yet to read any Democrat saying Clinton is forever tarnished.
Click to expand...

I've heard many say it. Maybe your inner circle/acquaintances are a bit light on Democrats ?
 
Condor060 said:
The only legacy Pelosi has accomplished

First impeachment in history that is completely partisan
First impeachment in history that doesn't have a single witness who can testify to the articles
First impeachment in history with all charges acquitted
First impeachment in history that refused opposing witnesses
First impeachment in history that refused to allow opposing party minority day
First impeachment in history that doesn't even have a criminal charge

What a bag of baboons
Click to expand...

Ya know one is running outta 'gas' when the ad homs dominate one's 'argument.' :2razz:
 
Condor060 said:
Yeah, riiight, when you can dispute any of those let me know.
Click to expand...

/// "bag of baboons" /// <--- There are no 'baboons' in Congress on either side of the aisle. Only flawed human beings with differing POVs and agendas. Your asinine positive claim has now been 'officially' debunked.. BUSTED!...next ?
 
Logician Man said:
/// "bag of baboons" /// <--- There are no 'baboons' in Congress on either side of the aisle. Only flawed human beings with differing POVs and agendas. Your asinine positive claim has now been 'officially' debunked.. BUSTED!...next ?
Click to expand...

So does that mean you can't dispute a single claim I made in the list? Or are you just happier deflecting from the question
 
Condor060 said:
Fine, McConnell has told Pelosi he has the vote and will institute the identical Senate rules Democrats voted for in the Clinton impeachment.
Democrats voted for those rules unanimously. Shouldn't be a problem, right?

And just for giggles, what the hell are all these witnesses going to testify too?

You have two charges against Trump. Obstruction of Congress and abuse of power for asking Zelenski to investigate Biden.

Problem is, Trump doesn't deny any of it. He said he told Zelenski to investigate Biden. Why? Because he can
Trump told his staff members not to submit to any Congressional subpoena and made it public.

If Trump isn't denying either charge, what are these witnesses going to testify too?
Click to expand...

Awesome! So Trump will testify under oath like Clinton did!
 
EnigmaO01 said:
Awesome! So Trump will testify under oath like Clinton did!
Click to expand...

Testify to what. He is already on record.

He said he told Zelenski to investigate Biden and he told his staff members not to submit to any Congressional subpoenas.

Unlike Clinton denying the charges against him, Trump isn't denying it, whats he going to testify too.

But I did notice you just decided to overlook the question, didn't you.

So what are these witnesses going to testify too? Or does that question scare you?
 
Condor060 said:
Testify to what. He is already on record.

He said he told Zelenski to investigate Biden and he told his staff members not to submit to any Congressional subpoenas.

Unlike Clinton denying the charges against him, Trump isn't denying it, whats he going to testify too.

But I did notice you just decided to overlook the question, didn't you.

So what are these witnesses going to testify too? Or does that question scare you?
Click to expand...

The question scares Trump. Otherwise he wouldn't invoke EP to keep 'any' witness from testifying..............unless he is the one who is 'afraid.'
 
Logician Man said:
The question scares Trump. Otherwise he wouldn't invoke EP to keep 'any' witness from testifying..............unless he is the one who is 'afraid.'
Click to expand...

You can always tell when a Democrat enters a forum. They never answer the question and flood the thread with whataboutisms all day.

So what are these witnesses going to testify too? Or does that question scare you?
 
Condor060 said:
You can always tell when a Democrat enters a forum. They never answer the question and flood the thread with whataboutisms all day.

So what are these witnesses going to testify too? Or does that question scare you?
Click to expand...

Funny you commenting about 'whataboutisms', as you futily attempt to predict the future which is clearly above your pay grade.
 
Condor060 said:
Testify to what. He is already on record.

He said he told Zelenski to investigate Biden and he told his staff members not to submit to any Congressional subpoenas.

Unlike Clinton denying the charges against him, Trump isn't denying it, whats he going to testify too.

But I did notice you just decided to overlook the question, didn't you.

So what are these witnesses going to testify too? Or does that question scare you?
Click to expand...

Wow sure glad you're not my lawyer.

And as soon as Trump opened his mouth he would commit perjury. I wonder how many lies he would rattle off before his lawyers would tell him to shut up?
 
EnigmaO01 said:
Wow sure glad you're not my lawyer.

And as soon as Trump opened his mouth he would commit perjury. I wonder how many lies he would rattle off before his lawyers would tell him to shut up?
Click to expand...

15,000 plus and counting since disgracing the Oval Office and the office of the U.S. Presidency.
 
EnigmaO01 said:
Wow sure glad you're not my lawyer.

And as soon as Trump opened his mouth he would commit perjury. I wonder how many lies he would rattle off before his lawyers would tell him to shut up?
Click to expand...

So in that limited imagination you came to the conclusion all on your own that I suggested Trump testify?

How did you do that?

But I have asked you the very same question 3 times now. I noticed how you continue to run from it.

So what are these witnesses going to testify too? Or does that question scare you?
 
Condor060 said:
So in that limited imagination you came to the conclusion all on your own that I suggested Trump testify?

How did you do that?

But I have asked you the very same question 3 times now. I noticed how you continue to run from it.

So what are these witnesses going to testify too? Or does that question scare you?
Click to expand...

The answer is that neither you nor they know what will be testified to. The more important question is why THAT scares people like you so much?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom