• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary is in the lead...

Simpletruther said:
New Poll Shows Hillary Overtaking Biden For Lead Among Democrats | The Daily Wire


Should you guys give her a shot at a rematch? Godzilla versus Megalon...

This could get interesting.

Biden just blamed the Hunter fiasco on his underlings.....he is on an epic blunder streak.
Click to expand...

From Justin Rosario:

"I keep seeing posts on Twitter from Bros insisting that Hillary is going to run again and then they rant and rave about how much they hate her and how she better not run or else.

It's almost like, I dunno, they desperately want her to run so they can relive the glory days of 2016. Because right now, they can't focus all of their hate on a single candidate to claim the DNC is "rigging" the primaries and it is frustrating the **** out of them.

It's going to be even more frustrating if there's no runaway frontrunner after Super Tuesday. They really -really- want to roll out the "rigged" talking point and they can't if 3 or 4 people are still seriously competing and Bernie still has a realistic chance of winning (he didn't midway through the 2016 primary, they lied about his chances for months).

My guess is that if the field doesn't clear by the convention, they'l start screaming it was rigged there and Russia will release emails to help them along. It won't matter that they'll turn out to be fake, there wasn't anything in the DNC email dump and every Bro will tell you it contained absolute "proof" the primary was "rigged."

They can't tell you what the proof -is- but they know it's in there, maaaaaaaan!

Remember, the goal of the Bros is not for Bernie to win, it is for Democrats to lose. If Bernie were to be the nominee, the Bros would do everything possible to alienate other voters, including real Bernie supporters."

Simpletruther are you a crypto Bernie Bro?
 
Lovebug said:
I always thought Bernie was a man of integrity, and although I don't agree with him on everything, it is something I admire. Of late though, he comes across as angry and bitter. That is not a becoming trait.
Click to expand...

They don't call him Old Yeller for nothing...

:)
 
OscarLevant said:
She only lost by 77,000 votes in the swing states, which she could easily get back.

Overall, she got 3,000,000 more votes than Trump, and if she ran again, she might do even better.

However, she won't excite the base, and that concerns me. Nor would Biden, for that matter.

In any case, as for those who assert she's "worse than Trump".....

Click to expand...


Hillary = Worst major party candidate in more than half a century

Trump = Just another plutocrat
 
Obscurity said:
Sanders and Warren are the only ones with principals, yes. Biden is corrupt, Mayor Pete is a blatant fraud and a liar.
Click to expand...

IOW, a Democrat.

Mayor Pete = The nominee
 
OscarLevant said:
Reagan ran for president three times.

However, I don't know of any candidate that was the nominee more than once.

I think, once you become the nominee, and lose, your chance of winning the nomination again are not good, though not impossible, if the voters are not happy with the current crop.

Another thing, given Trump's many scandals and transgressions, I don't see how they can make much hay out of the email server issue.

In my view, Hillary is much stronger at giving speeches than guffaw prone Biden is, and he's the front runner.

I wouldn't mind if she ran, to be honest, and I'd like to see Michelle in the running, as well.
Click to expand...

Nixon.

Parser already referenced him.

But Hillary is much, much, MUCH worse than Nixon.

MObama = Politically finished by her own "whites still running" words
 
TheParser said:
1. Richard M. Nixon made a comeback.

2. So Secretary Clinton could, too.

3. This time, of course, she would avoid the talk of "deplorables" and try to win back some of the Independents who went to Donald J. Trump or stayed home.

4. As an impartial observer, I think that Secretary Clinton would beat President Trump.

a. Many Dems who sat out the last election because of overconfidence would be sure to turn out this time.
Click to expand...

She very well could be the nominee what with the sorry slate of current candidates including Bloomberg who spent 100 millon and didn't move the needle. I like it so she can complain again that white males and Russia did her in,
 
If she actually ran again, her support would be much weaker this time. She could never win the primary.

People haven't forgotten 2016, and most will not want to risk reliving it.
 
Obscurity said:
Frankly, it seems to me, the only democrats in the 2020 race with even a SHRED of decency and principal are Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders.
Click to expand...

Of course, if you compare them to Trump, even Bloomberg is principled.
 
The rat party shot itself in the foot with their rush to find the most ridiculous out of touch lunatic progressive candidate they could find. As a result, they opened the door for Bloomberg and now Hillary is just itching to get in and save the party. Bernie is plenty pissed at both Bloomberg AND Hillary because them deciding they needed to enter or at least sniff the trail says they believe all the candidates currently in....suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck.
 
aociswundumho said:
The Democratic party is like a train wreck in action.
Click to expand...

And the republicans have no problems whatsoever!

ilIGLOhm.jpg
 
Oh for God's sake Hillary is not running, but she is living rent free in some of your heads. Get a grip!
 
Obscurity said:
Biden is a corrupt hack and a two bit clown. We all know these politicians get their kids kushy deals, like Hunter got. Acting like that didn't happen is childish.
Click to expand...

Trump traded off of his fame to become President, but you are not calling Trump corrupt. Trading off fame is done all the time, throughout history.

What it is is opportunism. It's a tad swampy, but if you were famous, if a Macaroni company offered you 3 million to do one of their commercials, would you turn it down, if you thought the food was okay ( not bad for you)

That his son worked for Burisma is not evidence of corruption. Nor is it evidence of corruption by Hunter. Getting a cushy deal is not corruption, per se. Opportunism, sure, but that's not what corruption means.

If someone hires me because of my dad's name, and they pay me more than I'm worth, that's not corruption, that's opportunism, and that's a PR move by the company I work for.

it's trading off my dad's name, sure, but that's not what corruption means.

It's not even nepotism, because I'm not in my dad's employ.

Trump said on TV " I like nepotism". He practices it all the time. But, that doesn't bother you.

So, are you a hypocrite? You tell me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom