• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Horowitz and his crack team of investigators fail to find evidence of the Steele dossier

M

marke

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 3, 2018
Messages
34,752
Reaction score
3,961
Location
north carolina
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Good news for Trump-hating democrat dogs. Horowitz brings home the bacon for the democrat home team. He and his team of crack researchers failed to uncover evidence of the cause for the FISA warrants.

dossier fingerprints.jpgclapper.jpgbrennan.jpghorowitz and steele.jpgstrzok.jpg
 
Last edited:
The coup survives for another day. Who's going to play Brennan in the movie?

Cassidy-JohnBrennan.jpg
 
tenor.gif
 
marke said:
Good news for Trump-hating democrat dogs. Horowitz brings home the bacon for the democrat home team. He and his team of crack researchers failed to uncover evidence of the cause for the FISA warrants.
Click to expand...

Wait, you are not supposed to say this yet! You are supposed to say he DID uncover massive evidence, but fake news wants to mislead everyone like he did not. The evidence of Deep State is there for everyone to see in Horowitz report!

Horowitz also confirmed no collusion and no quid pro quo and officially cleared Trump of any wrongdoing.
 
marke said:
Good news for Trump-hating democrat dogs. Horowitz brings home the bacon for the democrat home team. He and his team of crack researchers failed to uncover evidence of the cause for the FISA warrants.
Click to expand...

"Democrat dogs," hmmm. Welcome to American fascism. They used to claim to love America. Now, since they sold out to Russia, ultra-conservatives hate fellow Americans.

When I was growing up, America was a society in which political bipartisanship meant something: in spite of all the turmoil of Vietnam and the civil rights movement, in spite of the sinister machinations of Nixon and his henchmen, it was an era in which Democrats and Republicans agreed on basic values and could cooperate across party lines. That society is gone with people like the OP labeling other Americans that merely disagree with him as "dogs." This is the tribal mentality of the right-wing that has grown in America today. We can't just disagree on what's best for America. Oh no, Democrats aren't even people to them.
 
Speaking for myself, I'm very interested in hearing him explain his conclusions.

Whats being reported is that there were some big breeches in protocol but it wasn't due to any political bias. I would like to hear what he believes were the source of these mistakes and what changes he recommends in current protocols to prevent it from happening in the future.

Also even if its true there was no bias involved Trump is owed an appology by the intelligence community for how badly they scewed up.
Im curious if any progressives are willing to call for them to give Trump the appology he deserves.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
MTAtech said:
"Democrat dogs," hmmm. Welcome to American fascism. They used to claim to love America. Now, since they sold out to Russia, ultra-conservatives hate fellow Americans.

When I was growing up, America was a society in which political bipartisanship meant something: in spite of all the turmoil of Vietnam and the civil rights movement, in spite of the sinister machinations of Nixon and his henchmen, it was an era in which Democrats and Republicans agreed on basic values and could cooperate across party lines. That society is gone with people like the OP labeling other Americans that merely disagree with him as "dogs." This is the tribal mentality of the right-wing that has grown in America today. We can't just disagree on what's best for America. Oh no, Democrats aren't even people to them.
Click to expand...
Do you feel the same way about all the perjoratives the left uses to describe people on the right too?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
trouble13 said:
Speaking for myself, I'm very interested in hearing him explain his conclusions.

Whats being reported is that there were some big breeches in protocol but it wasn't due to any political bias. I would like to hear what he believes were the source of these mistakes and what changes he recommends in current protocols to prevent it from happening in the future.

Also even if its true there was no bias involved Trump is owed an appology by the intelligence community for how badly they scewed up.
Im curious if any progressives are willing to call for them to give Trump the appology he deserves.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Why exactly would Trump be owed an apology?
 
Why do trump and his supporters hate dogs so much?
 
trouble13 said:
Speaking for myself, I'm very interested in hearing him explain his conclusions.

Whats being reported is that there were some big breeches in protocol but it wasn't due to any political bias. I would like to hear what he believes were the source of these mistakes and what changes he recommends in current protocols to prevent it from happening in the future.

Also even if its true there was no bias involved Trump is owed an appology by the intelligence community for how badly they scewed up.
Im curious if any progressives are willing to call for them to give Trump the appology he deserves.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I too am mighty curious why you think trump is owed an apology.
 
TheDoctorWasIn said:
Why exactly would Trump be owed an apology?
Click to expand...
Cardinal said:
I too am mighty curious why you think trump is owed an apology.
Click to expand...
Because his campaign was being investigated based on false predicates. Even if you accept the most innocent of explinations, it is still factusl accurate that it was based on unreliable infirmation.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
trouble13 said:
Because his campaign was being investigated based on false predicates. Even if you accept the most innocent of explinations, it is still factusl accurate that it was based on unreliable infirmation.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
I don't know if you read that report that came out today, but Horowitz rather explicitly concluded that the investigations into Trump's campaign were adequately predicated. You appear to be confused.
 
trouble13 said:
Speaking for myself, I'm very interested in hearing him explain his conclusions.

Whats being reported is that there were some big breeches in protocol but it wasn't due to any political bias. I would like to hear what he believes were the source of these mistakes and what changes he recommends in current protocols to prevent it from happening in the future.

Also even if its true there was no bias involved Trump is owed an appology by the intelligence community for how badly they scewed up.
Im curious if any progressives are willing to call for them to give Trump the appology he deserves.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Prosecutors never apologize when they fail to get a conviction.

And I doubt those smeared by the right will get an apology, now that we know they were just doing their jobs.
 
trouble13 said:
Do you feel the same way about all the perjoratives the left uses to describe people on the right too?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Can you give us an example of any of the pejoratives used by the left against the right?
 
The cult is in shock.....yet another conspiracy theory goes down...but they will make new ones.

Comedy gold.
 
marke said:
Good news for Trump-hating democrat dogs. Horowitz brings home the bacon for the democrat home team. He and his team of crack researchers failed to uncover evidence of the cause for the FISA warrants.
Click to expand...

This petulant whining of sore losers is really pathetic. But whining is all the GOP has.
 
TheDoctorWasIn said:
I don't know if you read that report that came out today, but Horowitz rather explicitly concluded that the investigations into Trump's campaign were adequately predicated. You appear to be confused.
Click to expand...
What he ssid was that he does n see evidence that it was based on political bias.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
trouble13 said:
Speaking for myself, I'm very interested in hearing him explain his conclusions.

Whats being reported is that there were some big breeches in protocol but it wasn't due to any political bias. I would like to hear what he believes were the source of these mistakes and what changes he recommends in current protocols to prevent it from happening in the future.

Also even if its true there was no bias involved Trump is owed an appology by the intelligence community for how badly they scewed up.
Im curious if any progressives are willing to call for them to give Trump the appology he deserves.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

You have got to be kidding.

Every half baked claim that Trump shouted from the heavens about the DEEEEP STAAAATE being after him has been thoroughly trashed. He owes the FBI an apology:
- Spying....NOPE
- Deep state cabal....NOPE
- Political bias effecting the investigation.....NOPE
- unsupported FISA Warrants.....NOPE
- bias against him at the top of the FBI.....NOPE
- Steele Dossier having been the launching point for the Investigation and the FISA Warrants.....NOPE

We have some improprieties most particularly in document protocols which need to be tightened up and we likely will get some low level agents being criminally charged. THE END!
 
trouble13 said:
Speaking for myself, I'm very interested in hearing him explain his conclusions.

Whats being reported is that there were some big breeches in protocol but it wasn't due to any political bias. I would like to hear what he believes were the source of these mistakes and what changes he recommends in current protocols to prevent it from happening in the future.

Also even if its true there was no bias involved Trump is owed an appology by the intelligence community for how badly they scewed up.
Im curious if any progressives are willing to call for them to give Trump the appology he deserves.
Click to expand...

I read the summary report, and the only person who it appears is DEFINITELY owed an apology is Lisa Page.

As to Trump, and some of the others, Roger Stone is why they're not owed any apologies. We now know he was coordinating Wikileaks releases with the campaign, and that Assange is a Russian stooge.
 
jnug said:
You have got to be kidding.

Every half baked claim that Trump shouted from the heavens about the DEEEEP STAAAATE being after him has been thoroughly trashed. He owes the FBI an apology:
- Spying....NOPE
- Deep state cabal....NOPE
- Political bias effecting the investigation.....NOPE
- unsupported FISA Warrants.....NOPE
- bias against him at the top of the FBI.....NOPE
- Steele Dossier having been the launching point for the Investigation and the FISA Warrants.....NOPE

We have some improprieties most particularly in document protocols which need to be tightened up and we likely will get some low level agents being criminally charged. THE END!
Click to expand...
You should read the report before declaring THE END

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
trouble13 said:
What he ssid was that he does n see evidence that it was based on political bias.
Click to expand...

Right, that's pretty much all he can say when the decision is inherently subjective in some ways. He outlined the reasons for the investigation beginning, said it was properly predicated using the lower or higher standard, explained those predicates, indicated the decision was made ultimately by people who haven't been accused of any political bias, was signed off on at various times at multiple levels including at the highest levels, and more.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom