• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Liberal dirtbag proves why liberals are such scum

D_NATURED said:
The comment was directed at Trump. His sons name was uttered but only because it sounds like a title a monarch bestows. Lighten up with the absurd equivocation. There was no attack on Trump's kid.
Click to expand...

Also bringing up Baron or Barron shouldn't bother his father

Back at the 2015 event at which Donald Trump announced his bid for the presidency, his daughter Ivanka introduced her father as, first and foremost, an implacable foe of political correctness. "My father is the opposite of politically correct. He says what he means and he means what he says," she said, shortly before Trump characterized Mexican immigrants as disease-ridden, drug-smuggling rapists ("Some, I assume, are good people," he granted). In the first Republican primary debate, held in August of 2015, Trump himself reiterated that being anti-P.C. would be the hallmark of his political life, declaring, "I don't frankly have time for total political correctness."
 
rocket88 said:
So no answer. You can't answer what exactly was "attacking" any children.
Click to expand...

The depths of your willful ignorance is just something to behold. You were provided and answer, yet you plug your ears and say it didn't happen. What amazing times we're in.
 
Republicans are so dishonest as they scream like pigs over phony outrage. Want to see them care about gay people or black people? Give them something bigoted they can say a Democrat did.

We're all against wrongful political attacks on children of politicians - remember it was Republicans calling Chelsea ugly, etc. - but this was NOTHING bad about Barron, it was simply using his name to make a point about titles in the constitution, and Republicans act like Democrats raped him in the committee. Liars.
 
ludin said:
Karlan is a leftist hack with 0 credibility. she went into the trial hating trump and was not going to find him innocent.
she would be the first lawyer pushing for dismissal for lack of evidence of her client based on what they have on trump.

so her hypocrical bull**** is just that.

this hearing was nothing but another leftist circle jerk so they could get off.
well that is why we have the senate to stop this bull**** and they will clear trump of
all charges.

the only people sucking honor and decorum are people that use kids to attack parents.
aka leftist hack lawyers.
Click to expand...

Right wing nuts are so brainwashed by the lies coming out of the trump administration and the enabling of criminality from the disgusting, corrupt GOP politicians like Graham, McConnell, Nunes, Barr, Kennedy, etc.. any attempt to reason with them literally causes right-wing nuts to lose their minds.
 
KLATTU said:
Chad Pergram
✔
@ChadPergram
At impeachment hrng, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan notes the Constitution bars titles of nobility and that the Founders wanted to avoid the absolute rights of monarchs: "While the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron." This drew applause


Liberals just suck
Click to expand...

The wife of the guy who calls Mexicans thugs, drug dealers and rapists, and Democrats "America haters", is pissed off because someone uttered her son's name.

:violin:
 
Oh no, someone mentioned the President's kid and didn't attack him in any way. Someone grab the fainting couch.
 
Fishking said:
The depths of your willful ignorance is just something to behold. You were provided and answer, yet you plug your ears and say it didn't happen. What amazing times we're in.
Click to expand...

So saying his name is an attack? Or saying he is isn't royalty is an attack?
 
Fishking said:
#122 for you. So far as your reference to Limbaugh in 1992, I wasn't concerned about such things in middle school so...no, I didn't lose my marbles.
Click to expand...

#122? I think you are in the wrong thread.

Of course you didn't lose your marbles. In fact, you don't even care that someone actually insulted Clinton. You agree with Limbaugh, I'm sure.
 
tres borrachos said:
#122? I think you are in the wrong thread.

Of course you didn't lose your marbles. In fact, you don't even care that someone actually insulted Clinton. You agree with Limbaugh, I'm sure.
Click to expand...

I don't even know if I knew who he was at that time, let alone listen to him. Care to try again with something less stupid?
 
KLATTU said:
Chad Pergram
✔
@ChadPergram
At impeachment hrng, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan notes the Constitution bars titles of nobility and that the Founders wanted to avoid the absolute rights of monarchs: "While the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron." This drew applause


Liberals just suck
Click to expand...

Absolutely right.

The president is not a king, and he can't grant titles - much as Trump would love to.
 
Acadia said:
Except insinuating his name meant Baron, and not BARRON. Because kids need more bullying these days, right? Especially the 13-year old son of the President.
Click to expand...

The child name is his own parents responsibility. The witness said nothing inappropriate or demeaning.
 
Fishking said:
I don't even know if I knew who he was at that time, let alone listen to him. Care to try again with something less stupid?
Click to expand...

OK, so you were a kid back in 1992 who didn't listen to talk radio. How about the truly vile slurs thrown at the Obama daughters, ever heard any of them?
 
KLATTU said:
Chad Pergram
✔
@ChadPergram
At impeachment hrng, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan notes the Constitution bars titles of nobility and that the Founders wanted to avoid the absolute rights of monarchs: "While the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron." This drew applause


Liberals just suck
Click to expand...

Yeah, it's okay that, for the last ten years, Republicans have done the equivalent of Rwandan radio referring to Tutsis as "cockroaches" in their massive sweeping propaganda campaign to demonize liberals.:roll:
Now, thanks to Trump, they have enlisted help from Russian GRU Military Intelligence, something which quite rightly could almost be considered an act of war.

But let's cry for Barron Trump, who was not singled out for ridicule, only the mention of a Constitutional prohibition against titles of nobility.
Let's all cry for him, while ignoring the fact that Rush Limbaugh got away with labeling Chelsea Clinton as "the White House Dog".
 
KLATTU said:
Chad Pergram
✔
@ChadPergram
At impeachment hrng, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan notes the Constitution bars titles of nobility and that the Founders wanted to avoid the absolute rights of monarchs: "While the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron." This drew applause


Liberals just suck
Click to expand...

What's the issue? Are we not allowed to say the kids name?
 
Somerville said:
OK, so you were a kid back in 1992 who didn't listen to talk radio. How about the truly vile slurs thrown at the Obama daughters, ever heard any of them?
Click to expand...

Yup...and it was horrible when it was done to them as well. Now that that has been taken care of, want to try again without the smoke screen of deflection?
 
Fishking said:
Yup...and it was horrible when it was done to them as well. Now that that has been taken care of, want to try again without the smoke screen of deflection?
Click to expand...

It is your argument then, that simply because Barron Trump's name was mentioned in a comment about Trump not being the monarch he thinks he deserves to be, that mention is the equivalent of the vile words thrown at Chelsea Clinton and Sasha and Malia Obama? Have I got that right?
 
Somerville said:
It is your argument then, that simply because Barron Trump's name was mentioned in a comment about Trump not being the monarch he thinks he deserves to be, that mention is the equivalent of the vile words thrown at Chelsea Clinton and Sasha and Malia Obama? Have I got that right?
Click to expand...

I see by your stupid comment that you are either incapable of having an honest conversation or you just don't want to.
 
KLATTU said:
Chad Pergram
✔
@ChadPergram
At impeachment hrng, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan notes the Constitution bars titles of nobility and that the Founders wanted to avoid the absolute rights of monarchs: "While the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron." This drew applause


Liberals just suck
Click to expand...

Very much to do about NOTHING! What a joke and you cons have the nerve to call others snowflakes. Look in a mirror.
 
Fishking said:
I see by your stupid comment that you are either incapable of having an honest conversation or you just don't want to.
Click to expand...

I see by your stupid rejoinder that you are either incapable of having an honest conversation or you just don't want to.
 
Somerville said:
I see by your stupid rejoinder that you are either incapable of having an honest conversation or you just don't want to.
Click to expand...

You crushing on me? It's OK if you are.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom