• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Liberal dirtbag proves why liberals are such scum

TomFitz said:
Oh, and unlike your fool’s gold fuhrer, she had the presence of mind to apologize.

Trump will never do that, even though he does the same thing.
Click to expand...







As an impartial observer and a supporter of most of President Trump's policies, I agree with the statement above.

The President has made a lot of unkind remarks and -- to the best of my knowledge -- he has never apologized.

I remember when he came closest to an apology: During the campaign, he was apparently pressured into saying one sentence something like: "President Obama was born in the United States." That was it. His facial expression showed that he was not happy that he had to say it.

Quite frankly, like a lot of other Independents, if the Dems had not been so ferocious and personal in their opposition to the President, I might have considered voting for a Dem or staying home on election day. But their palpable "dislike" for him since Day 1 has only made me want to stand by my President.
 
snakestretcher said:
Who cares? Compared with the insults and threats Trump has directed against innumerable people a little gentle mockery directed at his offspring pales into insignificance. Poor little Barron; let's hope he learns from his obnoxious father's mistakes and grows into a decent person-unlike the rest of his grotesque family.
Click to expand...

Ok. So children are fair game?

Supporter of Prince Andrew?
 
KLATTU said:
Chad Pergram
✔
@ChadPergram
At impeachment hrng, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan notes the Constitution bars titles of nobility and that the Founders wanted to avoid the absolute rights of monarchs: "While the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron." This drew applause


Liberals just suck
Click to expand...

So it's wrong to say that an American child can't be British nobility now? Who knew.

You PC SJWs are getting desperate for things to be outraged about.
 
KLATTU said:
Chad Pergram
✔
@ChadPergram
At impeachment hrng, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan notes the Constitution bars titles of nobility and that the Founders wanted to avoid the absolute rights of monarchs: "While the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron." This drew applause


Liberals just suck
Click to expand...

I thought it was an excellent point but you are more than welcome to act like you give a crap with your fake outrage.
 
Fishking said:
Nice to see a "progressive" being OK with going after kids.
Click to expand...

"Going after" kids? How so?

What is factually wrong with what she said? An American child isn't British nobility. How is that going after a kid?

I'll bet you lost your marbles when Rush Limbaugh said that Chelsea Clinton was the White House dog.
 
Acadia said:
Wow, bringing a 13-year old kid into the impeachment circus was necessary and relevant how?
Click to expand...

Do all republicans have a comprehension problem? The point was trump isn't a king and can't make his kid a baron, it actually had nothing to do with the kid other than his name but you folks on the right always manage to twist something into what it doesn't mean so you can then display you fake outrage.
 
Chillfolks said:
Has Trunp tried to give his son a title of nobility? If not then what was the point of the comment?
Click to expand...

There was no point, except she thought it smart to make the comment. I disagree.

But this is a country where 60+ million people voted for a grown man who attacked the face of the wife of one of his political rivals. So Trump and his supporters have made it fashionable and acceptable to make stupid comments about nothing.

And the rest of us have to live with that. Including you.
 
haymarket said:
It was a perfect and apt illustration of the limitation on the powers of the President. And out was 100% true.

Nothing was said to insult, demean or disparage the young man.
Click to expand...

Except insinuating his name meant Baron, and not BARRON. Because kids need more bullying these days, right? Especially the 13-year old son of the President.
 
bongsaway said:
Do all republicans have a comprehension problem? The point was trump isn't a king and can't make his kid a baron, it actually had nothing to do with the kid other than his name but you folks on the right always manage to twist something into what it doesn't mean so you can then display you fake outrage.
Click to expand...

OMG, his name is BARRON, not Baron. To imply that Trump's 13-year old son's name has ANYTHING to with with a king or royalty is embarrassing for you an that troll, Karlan.
 
ocean515 said:
And which actual children did President Trump direct his comments towards?
Click to expand...

The comment was directed at Trump. His sons name was uttered but only because it sounds like a title a monarch bestows. Lighten up with the absurd equivocation. There was no attack on Trump's kid.
 
KLATTU said:
Chad Pergram
✔
@ChadPergram
At impeachment hrng, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan notes the Constitution bars titles of nobility and that the Founders wanted to avoid the absolute rights of monarchs: "While the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron." This drew applause


Liberals just suck
Click to expand...

this is just a new low of lows.

the first was on accusing an innocent kavanaugh of being a serial gang rapist.
now they are using children to attack their parents.

as if the first wasn't bad enough the 2nd is beyond the void but it doesn't matter to these slum dogs.
they honestly don't care.
 
Superfly said:
Um - y’all called Michelle Obama “an ape in heels.”

Your hypocrisy is noted.

Take a seat.
Click to expand...

There is a difference between a grown adult and a child.
so no hypocrisy at all.
 
KLATTU said:
Chad Pergram
✔
@ChadPergram
At impeachment hrng, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan notes the Constitution bars titles of nobility and that the Founders wanted to avoid the absolute rights of monarchs: "While the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron." This drew applause


Liberals just suck
Click to expand...

I was surprised to see someone as smart as Karlan say Baron's name in her statement. There was simply no need for it. She could have made the same point without it. She should have known it was going to be a distraction. With that said, I'm glad she apologized and in such a heart felt manor. It was very obvious by the words and by the apology that she wasn't saying anything negative about Barron. She merely mentioned his name.

Her testimony was absolutely astonishing. She's a brilliant and thoughtful scholar. She bent the GOP dumbasses over and made them her bitches. So I can see exactly why they want to focus on her saying a name and not about anything else she said.
 
lurchadams said:
I saw Karlan's testimony before congress. People should take heed of what she said. She has more knowledge and honor in her middle finger than trump does in his entire idiotic, criminal and bloated body.

trump and his supporters suck so hard when they enter any enclosed area they create a vacuum that sucks out any honor or decorum.
Click to expand...

Karlan is a leftist hack with 0 credibility. she went into the trial hating trump and was not going to find him innocent.
she would be the first lawyer pushing for dismissal for lack of evidence of her client based on what they have on trump.

so her hypocrical bull**** is just that.

this hearing was nothing but another leftist circle jerk so they could get off.
well that is why we have the senate to stop this bull**** and they will clear trump of
all charges.

the only people sucking honor and decorum are people that use kids to attack parents.
aka leftist hack lawyers.
 
Brn2bfree said:
-----------------
Liberals say such stupid things in the same sentence. Reason, liberalism is a mental disorder.
Click to expand...

Off topic bot-speak is off topic bot-speak.
 
Conservatives are so thin-skinned they literally get offended if you use someone's name.
 
KLATTU said:
Chad Pergram
✔
@ChadPergram
At impeachment hrng, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan notes the Constitution bars titles of nobility and that the Founders wanted to avoid the absolute rights of monarchs: "While the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron." This drew applause


Liberals just suck
Click to expand...

gulfman said:
pure liberal filth
Click to expand...


See there Klat, even Gulfman has you pegged.
 
ludin said:
There is a difference between a grown adult and a child.
so no hypocrisy at all.
Click to expand...

Was Trump sincere when he tweeted the following after Greta Thunberg spoke at the United Nations? -- "She seems like a very happy young girl looking forward to a bright and wonderful future. So nice to see!" Or was he being sarcastic?
 
RetiredUSN said:
I will be on here the morning after Nov. 6, 2020 watching liberal heads explode and laughing my ass off while Trump is tweeting what freaking losers they are.
Click to expand...

This is you.

giphy.gif
 
rocket88 said:
So what exactly was going after him? You can't answer that question. He isn't royalty. Yet. Though you are certainly doing your part to mske him that.
Click to expand...

Your question is ridiculous. She used his name (and him), as a mockery, to make a rabid partisan point that really just fell flat. Again, she knew she overstepped and apologized for it, even if it was insincere, yet y'all are struggling. Funny that.
 
tres borrachos said:
"Going after" kids? How so?

What is factually wrong with what she said? An American child isn't British nobility. How is that going after a kid?

I'll bet you lost your marbles when Rush Limbaugh said that Chelsea Clinton was the White House dog.
Click to expand...

#122 for you. So far as your reference to Limbaugh in 1992, I wasn't concerned about such things in middle school so...no, I didn't lose my marbles.
 
bongsaway said:
Do all republicans have a comprehension problem? The point was trump isn't a king and can't make his kid a baron, it actually had nothing to do with the kid other than his name but you folks on the right always manage to twist something into what it doesn't mean so you can then display you fake outrage.
Click to expand...

Well, that's what upsets them. They want King Donald.
 
Fishking said:
Your question is ridiculous. She used his name (and him), as a mockery, to make a rabid partisan point that really just fell flat. Again, she knew she overstepped and apologized for it, even if it was insincere, yet y'all are struggling. Funny that.
Click to expand...

So no answer. You can't answer what exactly was "attacking" any children.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom