• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Liberal dirtbag proves why liberals are such scum

Cardinal said:
Yes, clearly you were.
Click to expand...
How? By pointing out the hypocrisy of their mother? It is no more an attack on them than your post was simply because it mentioned their names.
 
Chillfolks said:
How? By pointing out the hypocrisy of their mother? It is no more an attack on them than your post was simply because it mentioned their names.
Click to expand...

So you did say their names, then? Sasha and Malia? If the answer is yes, then you attacked the children of the President.
 
KLATTU said:
Chad Pergram
✔
@ChadPergram
At impeachment hrng, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan notes the Constitution bars titles of nobility and that the Founders wanted to avoid the absolute rights of monarchs: "While the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron." This drew applause


Liberals just suck
Click to expand...

True...because as everyone knows John Barron is the name Trump used to call into TV and radio shows to report his sexual conquests. Those were the days when that was the least we had to hear about him.

Nice choice for a name for your child Donald.
 
Cardinal said:
So you did say their names, then? Sasha and Malia? If the answer is yes, then you attacked the children of the President.
Click to expand...
By your logic you have attacked them twice in this thread.
 
haymarket said:
Where was the attack? What she said was 100% true and not at all offensive or disparaging.
Click to expand...

This is part of the GOP bipolarism where they can be hypersensitive about attacks upon themselves but completely in denial about why they deserve the attention. Democrats are supposed to sit back and watch as Trump commits countless acts of incompetence and graft. Yet, we can't even utter the first name of the president's son to make a point about the limits of his official power...because there ARE limits.
 
Chillfolks said:
By your logic you have attacked them twice in this thread.
Click to expand...

Nope. They're not minors. I can't believe you attacked them when they were minors, though. That was really, scummy, you know.
 
Acadia said:
Wow, bringing a 13-year old kid into the impeachment circus was necessary and relevant how?
Click to expand...

It was a perfect and apt illustration of the limitation on the powers of the President. And out was 100% true.

Nothing was said to insult, demean or disparage the young man.
 
D_NATURED said:
This is part of the GOP bipolarism where they can be hypersensitive about attacks upon themselves but completely in denial about why they deserve the attention. Democrats are supposed to sit back and watch as Trump commits countless acts of incompetence and graft. Yet, we can't even utter the first name of the president's son to make a point about the limits of his official power...because there ARE limits.
Click to expand...

Exactly. Her comments were 100% true and a perfect illustration of the limitations of the power of the President.

Nothing was said to insult, demean or disparage the young man.
 
KLATTU said:
Chad Pergram
✔
@ChadPergram
At impeachment hrng, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan notes the Constitution bars titles of nobility and that the Founders wanted to avoid the absolute rights of monarchs: "While the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron." This drew applause


Liberals just suck
Click to expand...

Do you think Barron will need months of therapy over this sick burn?

:roll:
 
KLATTU said:
Chad Pergram
✔
@ChadPergram
At impeachment hrng, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan notes the Constitution bars titles of nobility and that the Founders wanted to avoid the absolute rights of monarchs: "While the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron." This drew applause


Liberals just suck
Click to expand...

I didn’t care much for it either, But,spare my your crocodile tears.

Hardly a week goes by that Donald Trump doesn’t do something exactly like that.

And, you repeat it, cheer for it, and try it out on your own.

Oh, and unlike your fool’s gold fuhrer, she had the presence of mind to apologize.

Trump will never do that, even though he does the same thing.
 
Cardinal said:
Nope. They're not minors. I can't believe you attacked them when they were minors, though. That was really, scummy, you know.
Click to expand...

Ok. That was funny... :funny
 
KLATTU said:
Chad Pergram
✔
@ChadPergram
At impeachment hrng, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan notes the Constitution bars titles of nobility and that the Founders wanted to avoid the absolute rights of monarchs: "While the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron." This drew applause


Liberals just suck
Click to expand...

Let's see,

We've got a Republican POTUS who has repeatedly stated some of the most insanely immature, hateful, uncouth, obnoxious, embarrassing, narcissistic, and outright asinine things that have ever come out of a US President's mouth, and you take a relatively lame comment that's actually stating a fact and think it's "scummy"?

Trump has not only lowered the bar for what defines scum, he's buried it so deep in the ground it's currently being transformed into diamond.

It's fun to watch anyone who supports Trump get all "faux outraged" over anything a rival politician says.
Talk about hypocrisy.

ASERXF7A4M34REPLRFRZS2QM2Q.gif
 
KLATTU said:
Chad Pergram
✔
@ChadPergram
At impeachment hrng, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan notes the Constitution bars titles of nobility and that the Founders wanted to avoid the absolute rights of monarchs: "While the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron." This drew applause


Liberals just suck
Click to expand...


While I'm not a fan of bringing people's children into discussions where they have no relevance, that you cite this as "why liberals are such scum" is pretty comical being that you seemingly support an individual who has repeatedly insulted opponents. By your own criteria, Trump would be "scum". Also, the statement that was made wasn't an attack on Barron, but rather a comment about limitations of power.
 
KLATTU said:
Chad Pergram
✔
@ChadPergram
At impeachment hrng, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan notes the Constitution bars titles of nobility and that the Founders wanted to avoid the absolute rights of monarchs: "While the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron." This drew applause


Liberals just suck
Click to expand...

The trouble with letting rabid dogs off their leash is that so many can see the foam at the mouth.
 
Fishking said:
Nice to see a "progressive" being OK with going after kids.
Click to expand...

So what exactly was going after him? You can't answer that question. He isn't royalty. Yet. Though you are certainly doing your part to mske him that.
 
KLATTU said:
Chad Pergram
✔
@ChadPergram
At impeachment hrng, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan notes the Constitution bars titles of nobility and that the Founders wanted to avoid the absolute rights of monarchs: "While the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron." This drew applause


Liberals just suck
Click to expand...

My, such outrage. I trust you were equally outraged by Trump's continual insults, condescension and name-calling?
 
KLATTU said:
Chad Pergram
✔
@ChadPergram
At impeachment hrng, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan notes the Constitution bars titles of nobility and that the Founders wanted to avoid the absolute rights of monarchs: "While the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron." This drew applause


Liberals just suck
Click to expand...

Well, both sides constantly try this gotcha stuff. But it is pretty sad we live in a time where academic types are not embarrassed at such juvenile stunts, but instead are celebrated.
 
The vileness and evil found in some of the Conservative and Very Conservative comments in this thread just might cause a person willing to think that Conservative and Very Conservative (also a few Libertarians) are beginning to realise that the person they are trying to protect really has ****ed up in a major fashion. The only act they have left is to attack, hoping to divert others from hearing the truth - just my opinion.
 
I do agree with one Pence comment made yesterday. Enough is enough! Time for the Repugs to be tossed out on their ear.
 
ocean515 said:
And which actual children did President Trump direct his comments towards?
Click to expand...

Who cares? Compared with the insults and threats Trump has directed against innumerable people a little gentle mockery directed at his offspring pales into insignificance. Poor little Barron; let's hope he learns from his obnoxious father's mistakes and grows into a decent person-unlike the rest of his grotesque family.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom