• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Durham to Barr: I got nuthin'

Moot said:
I think Barr is one step out the door. He doesn't have faith in his own department and the IC and DoJ doesn't have faith in him. How long can that last when he has turned nearly the entire government, except for Trump, against him?
Click to expand...

He should have learned what his future is if he fails the donald by talking to Sessions, but hey some people have to learn the hard way.
 
Barr isn't the US Attorney General. He's Trump's personal protector.
 
Checkerboard Strangler said:
Bill Barr’s handpicked prosecutor says he’s found nothing to support Trump’s FBI conspiracy theories



Looks like Bill Barr has just lost another trump card.
This really is beginning to look more and more like a "President Al Capone" ordering his attorney to investigate Elliott Ness.
Click to expand...

Oh, noes! So many of our trump-supporting members have been awaiting Durham's report with bated breath :(

In their wet dreams anyone daring to accuse trump of wrongdoing, despite the preponderance of evidence, must be led away in chains.

So sad, too bad.
 
poweRob said:
"****ting themselves" alright... :lamo



That's some "foundation".



Better luck next conspiracy theory.



That's a good question.



Well, you can stop waiting now Hypo.

------------

And now for going all in on conspiracy nutjobery...



:lamo
Click to expand...

LOL - looks like someone's been waiting to say, "I told ya so"! :)
 
Moot said:
Durham is the source for the people familiar with the matter, too. Apparently, they were there when IG Horowtiz met with Durham to discuss the IG investigation. In a day or two Barr will likely try to save face by disagreeing with Durham, too.
Click to expand...

I get it, but unless I missed something the article doesn't quote Durham. It says people familiar to the matter say that's what Durham said.


I'm not casting doubt on it the veracity of those "people familiar", just noting that it's someone saying Durham said it. But I was criticizing the guy you were responding to, trouble13. I figured he was setting up one of those defenses where one refuses to accept any facts from an "anonymous source"... see post 9
 
trouble13 said:
Do they cite thier source?
People{
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

"people familiar with the investigation . . ." :roll:

Funny thing is that I saw an item a couple of days ago that said Durham had information to fill in the holes Horowitz was encountering. I think I'll just wait until the actual reports come out.
 
Moot said:
They cited Durham as the source.
Click to expand...

Oh that neverTrumper? Fake News! I'm sure Barr can find someone that will understand winks and nudges.
 
Checkerboard Strangler said:
Bill Barr’s handpicked prosecutor says he’s found nothing to support Trump’s FBI conspiracy theories



Looks like Bill Barr has just lost another trump card.
This really is beginning to look more and more like a "President Al Capone" ordering his attorney to investigate Elliott Ness.
Click to expand...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...e084dc-16a9-11ea-9110-3b34ce1d92b1_story.html
"The prosecutor handpicked by Attorney General William P. Barr to scrutinize how U.S. agencies investigated President Trump’s 2016 campaign said he could not offer evidence to the Justice Department’s inspector general to support the suspicions of some conservatives that the case was a setup by American intelligence, people familiar with the matter said."

:mrgreen: Yeah, I believe it.
 
trixare4kids said:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...e084dc-16a9-11ea-9110-3b34ce1d92b1_story.html
"The prosecutor handpicked by Attorney General William P. Barr to scrutinize how U.S. agencies investigated President Trump’s 2016 campaign said he could not offer evidence to the Justice Department’s inspector general to support the suspicions of some conservatives that the case was a setup by American intelligence, people familiar with the matter said."

:mrgreen: Yeah, I believe it.
Click to expand...

When Durham fails to demonstrate that the Mifsud and Papadoupolos meeting was a US intelligence operation, will you accept that the Russia probe was legitimate and legal?
 
Mr Person said:
I get it, but unless I missed something the article doesn't quote Durham. It says people familiar to the matter say that's what Durham said.


I'm not casting doubt on it the veracity of those "people familiar", just noting that it's someone saying Durham said it. But I was criticizing the guy you were responding to, trouble13. I figured he was setting up one of those defenses where one refuses to accept any facts from an "anonymous source"... see post 9
Click to expand...

Yes, I saw that. He's not alone, there's quite a few here that use the "I know nothink" defense. Powerob made a list. But I get what you're saying..it's just that WaPo does verify their sources. Anyway, good luck trying to tell the know nothings that. You have a lot more patience than I do.
 
Outlook said:
When does the Durham report come out?
I think I’ll wait for the report. I’m not confident the Washington Post has the straight story.
Click to expand...

FFS that WAS the Durham report. Are you capable of reading?
Guess not.
 
MrPeanut said:
Oh that neverTrumper? Fake News! I'm sure Barr can find someone that will understand winks and nudges.
Click to expand...

Durham and Horowitz will likely be labeled RINOs by the Trumpers. Soon there won't be a decent honest republican left in the GOP.
 
Checkerboard Strangler said:
FFS that WAS the Durham report. Are you capable of reading?
Guess not.
Click to expand...

At least my level of comprehension is greater than a third grader.
I asked when the Durham report is expected to be out.
The report probably hasn’t been written but just like a typical supporter of the jack ass party making assumptions before knowing the facts. That’s right unnamed sources, haven’t heard that before.
 
Moot said:
Durham and Horowitz will likely be labeled RINOs by the Trumpers. Soon there won't be a decent honest republican left in the GOP.
Click to expand...

What will the democrats and their bosses at CNN say if the report finds wrong doing by the democrats and the prior administration? Can’t wait for the lineup of CNN analysts.
 
Outlook said:
What will the democrats and their bosses at CNN say if the report finds wrong doing by the democrats and the prior administration? Can’t wait for the lineup of CNN analysts.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't be holding my breath if I were you. :roll:
 
It's amazing how much lying that Rush and Sean do (that Republican voters believe).

I wish they were more savvy (and less gullible) like their kids.
 
The boys at Judicial Watch will be in high anxiety.
 
lurchadams said:
LOL - looks like someone's been waiting to say, "I told ya so"! :)
Click to expand...

I was putting that bull**** in my hip pocket as they spewed it. As much as they still gloat troll the 2016 election... They got a lot more coming.
 
poweRob said:
"****ting themselves" alright... :lamo



That's some "foundation".



Better luck next conspiracy theory.



That's a good question.



Well, you can stop waiting now Hypo.

------------

And now for going all in on conspiracy nutjobery...



:lamo :lamo :lamo :lamo
Click to expand...

sorry I'll wait for Durham and Barr to announce their findings.
 
Outlook said:
When does the Durham report come out?
I think I’ll wait for the report. I’m not confident the Washington Post has the straight story.
Click to expand...

I have heard it could be 6 months yet.
 
Hypothetical said:
sorry I'll wait for Durham and Barr to announce their findings.
Click to expand...

Im sure you'll wait beyond even that to make sure the talking points are correct.
 
poweRob said:
Im sure you'll wait beyond even that to make sure the talking points are correct.
Click to expand...

no no, I will find it odd if they do not find anything, but I will not fight it past that.

I think you all need to understand better what we are up against here, and I mean all common american citizens.

there is no doubt there is corruption on both sides in our political system, and a LOT of crap comes from it that directly hurts us. the fact that we cannot pinpoint who is running it or who the deep state IS, should scare you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom