Page 16 of 16 FirstFirst ... 6141516
Results 151 to 156 of 156

Thread: Democrats screw up the Judicial hearings

  1. #151
    Educator
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Northern Utah
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:02 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    680

    Re: Democrats screw up the Judicial hearings

    Quote Originally Posted by Athanasius68 View Post
    The president is invoking it.
    Yeah.

  2. #152
    Sage

    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:37 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    10,894

    Re: Democrats screw up the Judicial hearings

    Quote Originally Posted by Somerville View Post
    Rosenberg is wrong.
    Trump has the right of executive privilege. If Congress wishes to dispute it, they can go to court to dispute it.
    Turley is pointing out that Congress isn't doing so which means people who might have relevant information for the inquiry are not being heard out.
    Instead, Congress is muttering about issuing obstruction claims in response.
    Turley is arguing setting such precedents is disastrous for future presidents.

  3. #153

    Re: Democrats screw up the Judicial hearings

    Quote Originally Posted by Obscurity View Post
    Yes, it is true. Do you want the video evidence?
    Im pretty sure i understand what your talking about. Even if i dont it really does not matter. You made clear what the standard is going forward. We treat people we disagree with as enemies and its a win at all costs mentality. Anything one side does to crush the other side is acceptable

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  4. #154
    Auslander
    Obscurity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    PA
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 04:24 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    9,490

    Re: Democrats screw up the Judicial hearings

    Quote Originally Posted by trouble13 View Post
    Im pretty sure i understand what your talking about. Even if i dont it really does not matter. You made clear what the standard is going forward. We treat people we disagree with as enemies and its a win at all costs mentality. Anything one side does to crush the other side is acceptable

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
    Oh, no. That's not what I said. That's what Newt Gingrich said. That's what the right wing pundits have said for decades. They have been on a war footing since Clinton.

    I am a symptom of that malignancy.
    #BDS

    No forgiveness here remains.

  5. #155
    Sage

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 06:56 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    45,708

    Re: Democrats screw up the Judicial hearings

    Quote Originally Posted by Rising Sun View Post
    Volker already testified. If he was called again, is there any doubt the Alt-Right would be whining "Not again!!!"? Zelensky is a foreign leader. Again, why not our people who were there like Bolton, Pompeo and Rudy? It's not that hard to understand that Trump is hiding the truth.
    yep volker morrison etc .. were very clear that there was no quid pro quo.
    it doestn' matter if zelensky is a foreign leader he is a witness to the phone call since he was on it.
    he has claimed no quid pro quo.

    so i ask again i am not sure what part of that testimony you didn't understand. what about we have no evidence of quid pro quo
    do you not understand?

    what is confusing about that phrase?

    not that you will answer the question.
    facts don't care about your feelings.

  6. #156
    Ghost
    Rising Sun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:47 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    4,246

    Re: Democrats screw up the Judicial hearings

    Quote Originally Posted by ludin View Post
    yep volker morrison etc .. were very clear that there was no quid pro quo.
    it doestn' matter if zelensky is a foreign leader he is a witness to the phone call since he was on it.
    he has claimed no quid pro quo.

    so i ask again i am not sure what part of that testimony you didn't understand. what about we have no evidence of quid pro quo
    do you not understand?

    what is confusing about that phrase?

    not that you will answer the question.
    Disagreed on your assessments and thanks for dodging the fact Trump has forbid key officials to testify. Obviously if there was nothing to hide, Trump would have ordered Pompeo, Bolton and Rudy to be the first ones to testify about what happened.
    “An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life.”
    — From Robert Heinlein

Page 16 of 16 FirstFirst ... 6141516

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •