• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

And so it begins...

So, tell me, how many impeachment hearings has pencil-neck Schiff held and how many times where WH lawyers invited?

This is Schiff's second impeachment hearing, the first he oversaw, the person was impeached and removed. Feel better? Secondly, the white house lawyers could have attended, trump declined the offer. Any other bs you need answered?
 
You're in the Senate?

A long time ago I used to respect your posting but for some time now all you post is nonsense gobbelty goop. Now you are probably going to reply back to me that gobbelty is not actually actually a word or that I misspelled it. Your obsession with anything anti-Trump has taken away all of your objectivity. I know you are smarter than you appear in your posting. By the way, I like your Christmas tree avatar. Oops, I mean your "holiday" avatar. I want to be inclusive and not offend anyone by calling it a Christmas avatar.
 
A long time ago I used to respect your posting but for some time now all you post is nonsense gobbelty goop. Now you are probably going to reply back to me that gobbelty is not actually actually a word or that I misspelled it. Your obsession with anything anti-Trump has taken away all of your objectivity. I know you are smarter than you appear in your posting. By the way, I like your Christmas tree avatar. Oops, I mean your "holiday" avatar. I want to be inclusive and not offend anyone by calling it a Christmas avatar.

Then who is the "we"? You always claim not to be a Republican.

That's a Christmas tree in my avatar. But if it makes you happy calling it a "holiday" tree, I don't think anyone would care.

I'm not obsessed with Trump anymore than you're obsessed with him. We are both posting on a board called "Debate Politics". The President is a politician. Did you forget what we post about here? It isn't called "Debate American Idol". And this thread is about the impeachment of Trump. Posting in this thread means someone is "obsessed with Trump" to you? Then maybe you are simply projecting your obsession on me. I'm not obsessed with him. I'm posting on topic.

I don't think this is the right board for you.
 
Then who is the "we"? You always claim not to be a Republican.

That's a Christmas tree in my avatar. But if it makes you happy calling it a "holiday" tree, I don't think anyone would care.

I'm not obsessed with Trump anymore than you're obsessed with him. We are both posting on a board called "Debate Politics". The President is a politician. Did you forget what we post about here? It isn't called "Debate American Idol". And this thread is about the impeachment of Trump. Posting in this thread means someone is "obsessed with Trump" to you? Then maybe you are simply projecting your obsession on me. I'm not obsessed with him. I'm posting on topic.

I don't think this is the right board for you.

The post of mine you replied to had absolutely nothing to do with political debate. And I don't know what "we" refers to. There wasn't one word in my post that was "we" and yet you're asking me who was "we". That's what I mean by your posting being incoherent gobbledy gook. So, I don't think this is the right board for you. I don't hide who I am on here. My username is Moderate Right and I list my lean as slightly conservative. None of that means I am a left wing TDS'r. I have and do vote for a mix of Republicans, Democrats, and Independents but it doesn't mean that I don't lean right.
 
The post of mine you replied to had absolutely nothing to do with political debate. And I don't know what "we" refers to. There wasn't one word in my post that was "we" and yet you're asking me who was "we". That's what I mean by your posting being incoherent gobbledy gook. So, I don't think this is the right board for you. I don't hide who I am on here. My username is Moderate Right and I list my lean as slightly conservative. None of that means I am a left wing TDS'r. I have and do vote for a mix of Republicans, Democrats, and Independents but it doesn't mean that I don't lean right.

You said "our turn" and you don't know who you were referring to?

So you agree that you're a full Republican. It does explain why you are a citizen of Trump Fan Nation and would rather support a pedophile than a Democrat.

I'm on the right board. I'm not the one wondering why someone is posting about the President on a board called "Debate Politics". That is you.
 
You said "our turn" and you don't know who you were referring to?

So you agree that you're a full Republican. It does explain why you are a citizen of Trump Fan Nation and would rather support a pedophile than a Democrat.

I'm on the right board. I'm not the one wondering why someone is posting about the President on a board called "Debate Politics". That is you.

More gobbledy gook. If you don't want to have serious discussions then just say so.
 
More gobbledy gook. If you don't want to have serious discussions then just say so.

Is "gobbledy gook" a new phrased you learned on Hannity last night? You seem to like it. You keep posting it.

I'm having a serious discussion. I'm also not wasting anyone's time questioning why people are posting about politicians on a board called "Debate Politics".
 
Then the Right will feel good when they let Trump off in spite of overwhelming evidence.
When you get some evidence, let me know. After three years we are still waiting for the first piece that would stand up in court.
 
When you get some evidence, let me know. After three years we are still waiting for the first piece that would stand up in court.

I don't have evidence. I watched the hearings and saw the evidence everyone else presented.

I didn't know they started the impeachment hearings 3 years ago. I thought it was only 72 days ago. How time flies.
 
I don't have evidence. I watched the hearings and saw the evidence everyone else presented. I didn't know they started the impeachment hearings 3 years ago. I thought it was only 72 days ago. How time flies.
I must correct myself. We do have some hard evidence--the transcript.

Trump presented it before the secret hearings started. What they did in the hearings was present speculation and wishful thinking. We are waiting for the first evidence against him.
 
I must correct myself. We do have some hard evidence--the transcript.

Trump presented it before the secret hearings started. What they did in the hearings was present speculation and wishful thinking. We are waiting for the first evidence against him.

I didn't see the "transcript". Can you post a link to it? I saw the memo released by the WH which even contains the caveat that it isn't a word for word transcript. And that one of course did contain him asking Zelensky to investigate his chief political rival, as we know.
 
I didn't see the "transcript". Can you post a link to it? I saw the memo released by the WH which even contains the caveat that it isn't a word for word transcript. And that one of course did contain him asking Zelensky to investigate his chief political rival, as we know.
That's it. It is the memorandum for record prepared for the event. Since translation was involved, a word for word transcript is not possible. However, it is still the primary source.

You may "know" but the document does not actually say that, nor do secondary sources confirm that interpretation.
 
That's it. It is the memorandum for record prepared for the event. Since translation was involved, a word for word transcript is not possible. It is still the primary source.

You may "know" but the document does not actually say that, nor do secondary sources confirm it.

A word for word transcript is possible. They merely need to dig up that recording from the secret server they loaded it on and let 15 people listen to it and transcribe it for it to be a real transcript.

And yes, Trump mentioned Biden and the investigation. What US President asks another President to launch an investigation into a US citizen? One who is using the power of his office improperly.
 
A word for word transcript is possible. They merely need to dig up that recording from the secret server they loaded it on and let 15 people listen to it and transcribe it for it to be a real transcript.

And yes, Trump mentioned Biden and the investigation. What US President asks another President to launch an investigation into a US citizen? One who is using the power of his office improperly.
If a voice recording exists. It may not, due to diplomatic protocols. The MFR is the primary source and any Judge would recognize it as such.

Biden is mentioned in terms of the corruption issues of the previous Ukrainian administration. Indeed, the bulk of the conversation is about Ukrainian corruption and concerns that it posed.
 
If a voice recording exists. It may not, due to diplomatic protocols. The MFR is the primary source and any Judge would recognize it as such.

Biden is mentioned in terms of the corruption issues of the previous Ukrainian administration. Indeed, the bulk of the conversation is about Ukrainian corruption and concerns that it posed.

It exists. It was moved to a secure server.
 
Any questions from barking loon Lesko, or just her lips moving on mute?!

Barking loon? Yes, that description drew a smile! When I hear her rant, other stronger words, words not appropriate for this thread, come to mind!

I wonder how on earth she won her seat! Then, I realize Duncan Hunter and Chris Collins, in spite of pending charges, won reelection... and when it comes to the current impeachment hearings, how resoundingly all the GOP House members continue to put their party above integrity.
 
Back
Top Bottom