• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Impeachment Hearing - Thursday Nov 21 - Live Reaction

Learn what "coup" means.
I can't find it in the Constitution, I can find the provisions for impeachment, the current process.

Apparently, the coup will not be televised.
 
I would think you should know it first, since you are stating it is a coup.
If the Democrats are staging a coup, they would take power, which is not what is happening here.

Sort of like the Trump supported Coup in Bolivia, right?

Sickening. All so they could oust democracy and replace with prosperity gospel tyranny.
 
If I watched your media I would feel the same way.

Your boys are down on their knees hoping none of y'all actually watch the hearings.

Everything they are doing is just providing sound bites to their target audience.

I'm going to watch fox today and see if any relevant parts of the testimony actually make it on or just the republican edit.

Oh that is a hoot!

Fox News Host: "Today's Impeachment Testimony"

Schiff: "Hearing open"
Nunes: "Hoax"

Majority Panel: "the"
Witness: "no"
Rep Jordan: screed screed screed, case closed!!!!

Schiff: "Hearing closed"

Fox News: "See folks, Trump is exonerated again."

A double whammy by the way. Trump won't be exonerated and its not AGAIN anyway.
 
I don't understand his fixation beyond trying to squeeze every single last drop of outrage out of a dying minority constituency.

It makes absolutely no sense. None of the republicans, save Hurd, seem to be taking any of this seriously.

It's part of deflection tactics. That's why he's stuck on it. Every time I hear Nunes talk, I just think "Grow the **** up, you're supposed to be a representative in our Republic, act like it". But I mean, I think this is how things go when you have the Reality-TV President.
 
If a masked man walks into a bank with a sawed off shotgun and points it at a teller, some might have the impression he is there to rob the bank.

According the Republicans, it's only a robbery if he yells "I am a criminal and I am here to rob this bank."

Your not the first to use this lame analogy. The bank robber anology. Many newbies like yourself are pushing it.

Who is telling you folks to push it? Is this a boiler room directive?

Do you get a list of replies you are told to use?

Just wondering, because any number of analogies could be attempted, but the bank robber one is universal.
 
Based on Hill's accent I can already guess there will be accusations from the right that she is a foreign agent.

She's a spy, baby!

austin-powers-3.jpg
 
well you all can PRESUME anything you want...doesn't make it true though... or good evidence for an impeachment.

I can presume anything I want, thanks for your permission for something you have no power to give permission over.

However, we have heard multiple testimonies now that support this. And the only thing the WH has done in defense is to forbid others from testifying. Seems like there's something to hide. We've gotten plenty of testimony from people in the know that this was what was going on. Maybe if Trump or Guiliani are willing to take the stand and testify...
 
It's part of deflection tactics. That's why he's stuck on it. Every time I hear Nunes talk, I just think "Grow the **** up, you're supposed to be a representative in our Republic, act like it". But I mean, I think this is how things go when you have the Reality-TV President.

Yep. And this part of Hill's testimony is the most important about the Russians sewing division.
 
Your not the first to use this lame analogy. The bank robber anology. Many newbies like yourself are pushing it.

Who is telling you folks to push it? Is this a boiler room directive?

Do you get a list of replies you are told to use?

Just wondering, because any number of analogies could be attempted, but the bank robber one is universal.

Yes, my handlers told me to post it.

Or, maybe it just an obvious crime?

Thank you for the non answer though. It speaks volumes. Now you can get back to randomly posting the word coup every few minutes.
 
Dr Hill is certainly a powerful/knowledgeable witness!
 
I would think you should know it first, since you are stating it is a coup.
If the Democrats are staging a coup, they would take power, which is not what is happening here.

I do know it.

I always look up the meaning of words before I use them.

Coup is not one I typically use, so I looked it up the definition to ensure that a reference to it would be appropriate.

It is, and that is why I use it.

You should learn what it means.
 
Yes, my handlers told me to post it.

Or, maybe it just an obvious crime?

Thank you for the non answer though. It speaks volumes. Now you can get back to randomly posting the word coup every few minutes.

Thanks for confirming the obvious.
 
I don't think Nunes or Jordan want any piece of Hill if they are smart. Which they are not.
 
At the end of today's hearing I want to see Schiff take a clown nose out of his pocket and hand it to Nunes.
 
Your not the first to use this lame analogy. The bank robber anology. Many newbies like yourself are pushing it.

Who is telling you folks to push it? Is this a boiler room directive?

Do you get a list of replies you are told to use?

Just wondering, because any number of analogies could be attempted, but the bank robber one is universal.

your post did everything but prove his example as invalid.
 
At the end of today's hearing I want to see Schiff take a clown nose out of his pocket and hand it to Nunes.

sorry , he'll have to take it off his face , first.

and then we'll see he has an unlimited supply stuck there.
 

Those losing the fight, usually find it boring. Or at least they say they do. If they were "winning" they would be loving it.
Much like I am.
Candace, along with Tomi will fall into obscurity after Trump is gone, and no one will miss either of them when they are relegated to a strange nostalgia. I don't really care if they cry as they leave.
 
I do know it.

I always look up the meaning of words before I use them.

Coup is not one I typically use, so I looked it up the definition to ensure that a reference to it would be appropriate.

It is, and that is why I use it.

You should learn what it means.

It's not actually appropriate. It's just the GOP-Partisan narrative. Y'all say the same crap over and over trying to present your propaganda as truth. The impeachment proceedings are Constitutional, and Trump's actions have wrought them. I know you're scripted responses don't take into account reality....or the Constitution, but all your scripted wishful thinking cannot erase reality.

Maybe the President shouldn't be using personal lawyers to get around the State Department to get his demands enforced on foreign governments at threat of withheld funds.
 
I do know it.

I always look up the meaning of words before I use them.

Coup is not one I typically use, so I looked it up the definition to ensure that a reference to it would be appropriate.

It is, and that is why I use it.

You should learn what it means.

You can continue to try to insult my intelligence, but as I told you yesterday, I find you to be a groovy cat, who typically amuses me.
Nothing has changed. Except you think this is a coup, something others on the right are calling this.
And then.
And then (boy you are gonna laugh), you then call out other for being on script!
A ****ing hoot bro. A ****ing hoot.
 
your post did everything but prove his example as invalid.

Didn't try to prove it was invalid.

Just questioned why it's being universally used by so many on the far left.

Curious who has instructed them to use it, when so many other analogies would also fit.

Coordination of propaganda is a common tactic in elections and when special interests are trying to manipulate public opinion.

Notice how many far left posters have joined this site in the last 60 days?
 
Didn't try to prove it was invalid.

Just questioned why it's being universally used by so many on the far left.

Curious who has instructed them to use it, when so many other analogies would also fit.

Coordination of propaganda is a common tactic in elections and when special interests are trying to manipulate public opinion.

because it's, you know, accurate.
 
Back
Top Bottom