- Joined
- Mar 3, 2018
- Messages
- 16,876
- Reaction score
- 7,397
- Location
- San Diego
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Wham!!!!
Wham!!!!
To be fair, it's not Schiff doing the "obliterating." The testimony - evidence, facts - is what obliterates their dishonest defense. Schiff just did a good job of selecting the important quotes.
I don't like the bug-eyed thing either. Fortunately, opening your eyes a little too wide does not have any effect on the testimony of other people you are reading when you open your eyes too much.
And if that's all Trumpists' got.... :lol:
:lamo:2wave::2rofll:
Wussy dems got bitch-slapped by barney fife.
:shock:
The Actual Testimony
The Actual Testimony
I've heard repubs counter arguments, they are specious and moronic. To intelligent people, it is obvious.
But, of course, to 40% of the population, they lack the requisite intellectual capacity to see it and there is not much that can be done about it.
LOL every time a leftist faces serious facts thy don't like , they resort to condescension.
now why is that?
Kinda like whenever someone on the left offers a plan to help people, working people, dems are accused of being communists and/or implying they are totalitarian socialists ( as opposed to democratic socialists, which is something different entirely ) by the right without adding a substantive counter argument.
Sondland And The Quid Pro Quo That Wasn't - Victory Girls Blog
Check out the exchange between Turner and Sondland.
Paraphrasing
" No one told told you Trump was tying aid to an investigation"
" Yes"
" Then what made you think that ?"
" I presumed it"
Presumed it ---> LAFFRIOT!!!!!
Crooked Donald is proven to be guilty as hell and the R's still are like:
Sondland And The Quid Pro Quo That Wasn't - Victory Girls Blog
Check out the exchange between Turner and Sondland.
Paraphrasing
" No one told told you Trump was tying aid to an investigation"
" Yes"
" Then what made you think that ?"
" I presumed it"
Presumed it ---> LAFFRIOT!!!!!
SIAP. How can a non-witness (Schiff) obliterate the testimony of witnesses who didn't implicate Trump?:lamo
SIAP. How can a non-witness (Schiff) obliterate the testimony of witnesses who didn't implicate Trump?:lamo
Not a single witness failed to implicate Donald J. Trump in his attempt to bribe Ukrainian President Zelensky.
Not one.
:2wave:
You just proved the premise of the meme, thank you.
Schiff is recapping other's testimony, not testifying himself. Is this a real question? Or, are you really that...........(nevermind)?
Not a single witness failed to implicate Donald J. Trump in his attempt to bribe Ukrainian President Zelensky.
Not one.
:2wave: