• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Schiff OBLITERATES Republicans arguments



Crooked Donald is proven to be guilty as hell and the R's still are like:

giphy.gif
 
Schiff was great today. His final recap was so right on the money that he even got applause from the crowd.
 
SchiffShow living up to name

Screen Shot 2019-11-20 at 1.12.37 PM.jpg
 
To be fair, it's not Schiff doing the "obliterating." The testimony - evidence, facts - is what obliterates their dishonest defense. Schiff just did a good job of selecting the important quotes.










I don't like the bug-eyed thing either. Fortunately, opening your eyes a little too wide does not have any effect on the testimony of other people you are reading when you open your eyes too much.


And if that's all Trumpists' got.... :lol:
 
To be fair, it's not Schiff doing the "obliterating." The testimony - evidence, facts - is what obliterates their dishonest defense. Schiff just did a good job of selecting the important quotes.










I don't like the bug-eyed thing either. Fortunately, opening your eyes a little too wide does not have any effect on the testimony of other people you are reading when you open your eyes too much.



And if that's all Trumpists' got.... :lol:

I'm no doctor but it looks like he may have hyperthyroidism.
 
This was the John Dean type of testimony that has blown the inquiry wide open. Perry will be recieving a subpoena anyday now. And we all know Perry is not the sharpest knife in the drawer.
 
Sondland And The Quid Pro Quo That Wasn't - Victory Girls Blog

Check out the exchange between Turner and Sondland.
Paraphrasing

" No one told told you Trump was tying aid to an investigation"
" Yes"
" Then what made you think that ?"
" I presumed it"

Presumed it ---> LAFFRIOT!!!!!
 








The Actual Testimony


I've heard repubs counter arguments, they are specious and moronic. To intelligent people, it is obvious.

But, of course, to 40% of the population, they lack the requisite intellectual capacity to see it and there is not much that can be done about it.
 
I've heard repubs counter arguments, they are specious and moronic. To intelligent people, it is obvious.

But, of course, to 40% of the population, they lack the requisite intellectual capacity to see it and there is not much that can be done about it.

LOL every time a leftist faces serious facts thy don't like , they resort to condescension.

now why is that?
 
LOL every time a leftist faces serious facts thy don't like , they resort to condescension.

now why is that?

Kinda like whenever someone on the left offers a plan to help people, working people, dems are accused of being communists and/or implying they are totalitarian socialists ( as opposed to democratic socialists, which is something different entirely ) by the right without adding a substantive counter argument.
 
Kinda like whenever someone on the left offers a plan to help people, working people, dems are accused of being communists and/or implying they are totalitarian socialists ( as opposed to democratic socialists, which is something different entirely ) by the right without adding a substantive counter argument.

ok but that is an argument against policy.. much different than 'you're dumb'
 
Sondland And The Quid Pro Quo That Wasn't - Victory Girls Blog

Check out the exchange between Turner and Sondland.
Paraphrasing

" No one told told you Trump was tying aid to an investigation"
" Yes"
" Then what made you think that ?"
" I presumed it"

Presumed it ---> LAFFRIOT!!!!!

Excellent point
 
Crooked Donald is proven to be guilty as hell and the R's still are like:

giphy.gif

SIAP. How can a non-witness (Schiff) obliterate the testimony of witnesses who didn't implicate Trump?:lamo
 
SIAP. How can a non-witness (Schiff) obliterate the testimony of witnesses who didn't implicate Trump?:lamo

Not a single witness failed to implicate Donald J. Trump in his attempt to bribe Ukrainian President Zelensky.

Not one.

:2wave:
 
SIAP. How can a non-witness (Schiff) obliterate the testimony of witnesses who didn't implicate Trump?:lamo

You just proved the premise of the meme, thank you.


Schiff is recapping other's testimony, not testifying himself. Is this a real question? Or, are you really that...........(nevermind)?
 
You just proved the premise of the meme, thank you.


Schiff is recapping other's testimony, not testifying himself. Is this a real question? Or, are you really that...........(nevermind)?

If Schiff is recapping others' testimony, he needs to pay closer attention to said testimony.
 
Not a single witness failed to implicate Donald J. Trump in his attempt to bribe Ukrainian President Zelensky.

Not one.

:2wave:

Your proof being?
EDIT: Realize, saying it a bunch of times doesn't make it so.
 
Back
Top Bottom