• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Impeachment Hearings Are Going Unbelievably Horribly for Republicans

digitusmedius

digitusmedius

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
13,914
Reaction score
4,086
Location
Oregon
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Nunes is reduced to reciting the same litany of whining, lying, character and deflection every time he opens his filthy cakehole. Jordan just keeps revealing what a shameless desperate tool he is. And they still haven't come up with anything better than their Dear ****bag's crimes weren't successful therefore "no harm, no foul" which, of course, has no basis in law whatsoever.

For my part, this is far more fun than I expected.
 
digitusmedius said:
Nunes is reduced to reciting the same litany of whining, lying, character and deflection every time he opens his filthy cakehole. Jordan just keeps revealing what a shameless desperate tool he is. And they still haven't come up with anything better than their Dear ****bag's crimes weren't successful therefore "no harm, no foul" which, of course, has no basis in law whatsoever.

For my part, this is far more fun than I expected.
Click to expand...

The Trump stooges are eating up everything Nunes and Jordan say. It's impossible to over estimate some people's appetite for bull****.:mrgreen:
 
bearpoker said:
The Trump stooges are eating up everything Nunes and Jordan say. It's impossible to over estimate some people's appetite for bull****.:mrgreen:
Click to expand...

I guess we have to trust the rest of the country to see through all that BS. That's what remains to be seen.
 
Nunes is now veering off into deep space about how much ****bag hates helping our allies to protect US.
 
digitusmedius said:
Nunes is reduced to reciting the same litany of whining, lying, character and deflection every time he opens his filthy cakehole. Jordan just keeps revealing what a shameless desperate tool he is. And they still haven't come up with anything better than their Dear ****bag's crimes weren't successful therefore "no harm, no foul" which, of course, has no basis in law whatsoever.

For my part, this is far more fun than I expected.
Click to expand...

then you are not listening to any of the actual testimony.

sondland admitted no quid pro quo numerous times already.

i love schiff's face when sondland said the president said no quid pro quo.
lmao.
 
At this point everybody's just repeating the same story over and over.

Looks like it's, at worst, a minor campaign violation.
Pay the 500 dollar fine and move on.
Nobody's watching these hearings
 
They don't care. They think Trump is going to keep Mexicans out of the country.
 
Democrats = Completely delusional

2016 broke them.

:shrug:
 
ludin said:
then you are not listening to any of the actual testimony.

sondland admitted no quid pro quo numerous times already.

i love schiff's face when sondland said the president said no quid pro quo.
lmao.
Click to expand...

Saying "no quid pro quo" when you're in the middle of demanding a quo for a quid doesn't mean it's ok. It just shows that Trump knew what he was doing well enough to deny it in real time.

This is some nice aid we got ova heea. Sure would be a shame if somethin were to happen to it. Now now, let's all be nice and polite. We're all friends here, right? Right?
 
ludin said:
then you are not listening to any of the actual testimony.

sondland admitted no quid pro quo numerous times already.

i love schiff's face when sondland said the president said no quid pro quo.
lmao.
Click to expand...

I know this will come as a shock, but just because Trump said "no quid pro quo" doesn't mean there was no quid pro quo.
 
bearpoker said:
I know this will come as a shock, but just because Trump said "no quid pro quo" doesn't mean there was no quid pro quo.
Click to expand...

Prison is full of "innocent" people who never did any of things they were convicted of. :yes:
 
ludin said:
then you are not listening to any of the actual testimony.

sondland admitted no quid pro quo numerous times already.

i love schiff's face when sondland said the president said no quid pro quo.
lmao.
Click to expand...

Sorry but facts don't care about your feelings.

'The answer is yes': Sondland affirms 'quid pro quo' in Ukraine dealings - POLITICO

President Donald Trump’s top Europe envoy Gordon Sondland told House impeachment investigators Wednesday that Trump conditioned a valuable White House meeting for Ukraine's new president on his willingness to launch investigations into Trump’s Democratic adversaries, including former Vice President Joe Biden.

“Was there a ‘quid pro quo?’” Sondland — a close Trump ally and longtime GOP donor — said in his opening remarks to the House Intelligence Committee. “The answer is yes.”
 
Oh, I forgot about Nunes continually trying to inject The Hill John Solomon's BIG LIE and thoroughly debunked article about the DNC and Ukrainians "conspiring" against ****bag in the 2016 election. This is classic Goebbelism in action.
 
KLATTU said:
At this point everybody's just repeating the same story over and over.

Looks like it's, at worst, a minor campaign violation.
Pay the 500 dollar fine and move on.
Nobody's watching these hearings
Click to expand...

We have a clear precedent in Nixon.

What did he do?

He was just hedging his bets to give the world the best American President ever.

Yous guys screwed up if the Senate does not remove him from office.
 
ludin said:
then you are not listening to any of the actual testimony.

sondland admitted no quid pro quo numerous times already.

i love schiff's face when sondland said the president said no quid pro quo.
lmao.
Click to expand...

You obviously must be watching something other than the the testimony Sondland gave. Let me guess.
 
ludin said:
then you are not listening to any of the actual testimony.

sondland admitted no quid pro quo numerous times already.

i love schiff's face when sondland said the president said no quid pro quo.
lmao.
Click to expand...

Winston said:
Sorry but facts don't care about your feelings.

'The answer is yes': Sondland affirms 'quid pro quo' in Ukraine dealings - POLITICO

President Donald Trump’s top Europe envoy Gordon Sondland told House impeachment investigators Wednesday that Trump conditioned a valuable White House meeting for Ukraine's new president on his willingness to launch investigations into Trump’s Democratic adversaries, including former Vice President Joe Biden.

“Was there a ‘quid pro quo?’” Sondland — a close Trump ally and longtime GOP donor — said in his opening remarks to the House Intelligence Committee. “The answer is yes.”
Click to expand...

He's lying.
 
bearpoker said:
The Trump stooges are eating up everything Nunes and Jordan say. It's impossible to over estimate some people's appetite for bull****.:mrgreen:
Click to expand...

I'd like to see a photoshop with the caption 'The trump stooges' and pictures of Jordan, Nunes and Graham as the three stooges.
 
ludin said:
then you are not listening to any of the actual testimony.

sondland admitted no quid pro quo numerous times already.

i love schiff's face when sondland said the president said no quid pro quo.
lmao.
Click to expand...

LOL! The denial of reality is just effing DELICIOUS.

He literally stated there was a quid pro quo under questioning, under oath.
 
digitusmedius said:
Nunes is reduced to reciting the same litany of whining, lying, character and deflection every time he opens his filthy cakehole. Jordan just keeps revealing what a shameless desperate tool he is. And they still haven't come up with anything better than their Dear ****bag's crimes weren't successful therefore "no harm, no foul" which, of course, has no basis in law whatsoever.

For my part, this is far more fun than I expected.
Click to expand...

Agreed. My favorite moment was when Nunes simply said NOPE when it was his turn. That said it all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom