• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The most pathetic "witness" yet

Logical1

Logical1

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 24, 2018
Messages
7,394
Reaction score
2,307
Location
Nebraska
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
In the last go around with Schiff and his witch hunt, the "witness" turned out to be a real witch. Everyone could she was a bitter whining old hag that was whining about being fired.
She with out a doubt was the most pathetic "witness" the democrats have put on yet!! The republicans on the Comm force her to admit basically she knew NOTHING about the phone call, or for that matter much of anything!!!!

But as brought out she was not a team player for the President, and actually hated him. Besides that she pretty much displayed the attitude of so many B'crats in the State Dept. They always have given the impression that THEY know more than any president.

Lastly I dont know if it was brought out at the "inquiry" since I havent been watching the farce, but Obama fired ALL the ambassadors when he became president.
 
Logical1 said:
In the last go around with Schiff and his witch hunt, the "witness" turned out to be a real witch. Everyone could she was a bitter whining old hag that was whining about being fired.
She with out a doubt was the most pathetic "witness" the democrats have put on yet!! The republicans on the Comm force her to admit basically she knew NOTHING about the phone call, or for that matter much of anything!!!!

But as brought out she was not a team player for the President, and actually hated him. Besides that she pretty much displayed the attitude of so many B'crats in the State Dept. They always have given the impression that THEY know more than any president.

Lastly I dont know if it was brought out at the "inquiry" since I havent been watching the farce, but Obama fired ALL the ambassadors when he became president.
Click to expand...

The poster's statement is full of prejudice and subjectivity and clearly is in the domain of one who is beholden to Trump.
 
Glowpun said:
The poster's statement is full of prejudice and subjectivity and clearly is in the domain of one who is beholden to Trump.
Click to expand...
Well I will fully admit I am not beholded to the traitor Schiff that wants to change the result of the last election.
 
Logical1 said:
In the last go around with Schiff and his witch hunt, the "witness" turned out to be a real witch.
Click to expand...

Oh god, no wonder Americans are the laughing stocks of the world. :lamo


Your poor fellow citizens, having this as the face of their country.
 
Glowpun said:
The poster's statement is full of prejudice and subjectivity and clearly is in the domain of one who is beholden to Trump.
Click to expand...

I would say it is completely at odds with what we saw.

If I remember correctly, the OP said they weren't going to watch the hearings, so this may be hearsay. Which apparently is very appropriate when he does it.
 
JustHanging said:
I would say it is completely at odds with what we saw.

If I remember correctly, the OP said they weren't going to watch the hearings, so this may be hearsay. Which apparently is very appropriate when he does it.
Click to expand...
And I dare say virtually all the "witnesses" were not in the Oval Office with the President, so their testimony is here say too. But one stupid democrat congressman said that in some cases here say is better than the truth. Yeah sure.
 
Logical1 said:
And I dare say virtually all the "witnesses" were not in the Oval Office with the President, so their testimony is here say too. But one stupid democrat congressman said that in some cases here say is better than the truth. Yeah sure.
Click to expand...

Well GOP counsel explained they aren't there to learn about true stuff, so you may be in luck.

CASTOR: I have no idea what any of this is about
YOVANOVICH: I can keep explaining it to you
CASTOR: With all due respect, ambassador, learning about true stuff that actually happened is not why we’re here
Click to expand...
 
Logical1 said:
And I dare say virtually all the "witnesses" were not in the Oval Office with the President, so their testimony is here say too.
Click to expand...

You know, if you actually listened to the testimony, instead of just being told what to think, you might have a more accurate picture of what's going on. On one phone call, in a restaurant, Trump and Sondland were talking so loudly someone seated at the table could hear what they were saying. It was first hand.

In a public restaurant. Christ, no wonder Trump is the laughing stock of the world eh?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom