• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump's Latest Ludicrous Con, Can the Impeachment Defense Force Save Their Hero?

Old 'N Chill

Old 'N Chill

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 24, 2019
Messages
26,235
Reaction score
44,673
Location
USA
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Independent
I can't believe he's using these tactics to manipulate the weak mindless stooges who worship him as their king. Don't these people have lives, are they so desperate to be part of a group, even if it's a cult? What did they do before the Conman in Chief dominated their lives and their dreams? :roll:

Trump's latest ludicrous con: Can the Impeachment Defense force save their hero?

Trump's "Impeachment Defense" team is a joke. But his true goal — unmaking American democracy — definitely isn't


One of Trump’s most lucrative cons is issuing membership cards in exchange for campaign donations from his cult-like followers.

The divine right of kings was torn down in the United States by the framers, the Revolutionary War, and the Constitution. More than 250 years later, Trump and his allies want to reinstate divine right -- for him and other Republican presidents to follow.


Donald Trump’s “Official Impeachment Defense Membership Cards” are a loyalty oath, sworn by those who stand with Donald Trump against the rule of law, democracy, and the U.S. Constitution. By implication, Trump’s membership cards signify membership in a quasi-secret organization that deems itself superior to outsiders.
Click to expand...

Trump's latest ludicrous con: Can the Impeachment Defense force save their hero? | Salon.com
 
Old 'N Chill said:
I can't believe he's using these tactics to manipulate the weak mindless stooges who worship him as their king. Don't these people have lives, are they so desperate to be part of a group, even if it's a cult? What did they do before the Conman in Chief dominated their lives and their dreams? :roll:



Trump's latest ludicrous con: Can the Impeachment Defense force save their hero? | Salon.com
Click to expand...

Still waiting for a post debating this. Maybe in the morning, if I look.
 
Grand Mal said:
Still waiting for a post debating this. Maybe in the morning, if I look.
Click to expand...

That would require something debatable being supplied from such a source as Salon... All the article does is throttle Trump and his supporters for no other reason then Orange man bad.

It still touts Russian Collusion as some form of impeachable offence, even though nothing was brought forward as being illegal, or even notable as what the left tried to prove, and even now the impeachement effort over this Ukraine "scandal" if one can actually call it that. Even though there is no indication of actual wrong doing, and this last hearing only proved that the democrats position is getting weaker as this goes.

What debatable point do you believe that this article makes?
 
Old 'N Chill said:
I can't believe he's using these tactics to manipulate the weak mindless stooges who worship him as their king. Don't these people have lives, are they so desperate to be part of a group, even if it's a cult? What did they do before the Conman in Chief dominated their lives and their dreams? :roll:



Trump's latest ludicrous con: Can the Impeachment Defense force save their hero? | Salon.com
Click to expand...

If all you have is a political hit piece, from a site that is obviously lying it's ass off.

Then you still don't have much. Because at this point they're stull just running off the anger of losing the 2016 election, and that doesn't even cover the issues that are being directly lied about. But you're not going to look into that are you?

You're just going to post another trash article, from the same trash site.

Salon, you can't possibly be serious?
 
I oppose them as an unnecessary waste of carbon-gobbling trees since he isn't going to be removed by the Senate anyway.
 
Oborosen said:
That would require something debatable being supplied from such a source as Salon... All the article does is throttle Trump and his supporters for no other reason then Orange man bad.

It still touts Russian Collusion as some form of impeachable offence, even though nothing was brought forward as being illegal, or even notable as what the left tried to prove, and even now the impeachement effort over this Ukraine "scandal" if one can actually call it that. Even though there is no indication of actual wrong doing, and this last hearing only proved that the democrats position is getting weaker as this goes.

What debatable point do you believe that this article makes?
Click to expand...

More like Orange man is INEPT AF and so is his entire administration.

White racist nationalists are making immigration policy.
Anti education religious zealots are leading our dept of edu.
Anti environment capitalists are heading the epa.

It's a mockery and you guys are the players in this charade and have no idea you're being used.
 
Can the Impeachment Defense Force Save Their Hero?
Click to expand...

What defense would that be? A. (Pencil Neck) Schitt has declared the opposition is not allowed to call witnesses and at one point instructed one of his witnesses to not answer a question posed by a GOPer committee member. DJT hands are tied unlike Nixon and Slick who had full rights to defend themselves.

We won't get the full story until it gets to the Senate and the trial begins. Then America will see how corrupt leftists truly are.
 
It was a mistake to frame the Cold War as Communism vs Capitalism. Americans struggle to understand what Authoritarianism is and it could be our downfall.
 
Rachael Bade
‏Verified account @rachaelmbade

NUGGET: The Dem decision 2 retire “quid pro quo” & embrace “bribery” followed a DCCC study showing the word resonates more in battlegrounds

It’s also clearly stated in the Constitution as grounds 4 removing POTUS. Could we see it in impeachment articles?
LAFFRIOT!
 
I did enjoy the Republican defense council on Wednesday setting up how things that were done may have been unusual, but they weren't really bad. He was working his way up to bribery with the same question. I know it's unusual for a U.S. President to use bribery on a foreign government to get political smears against his chief rival in an upcoming election, but it's Donald Trump, and he's never been in jail, how bad can it be??????
 
KLATTU said:
Rachael Bade
‏Verified account @rachaelmbade

NUGGET: The Dem decision 2 retire “quid pro quo” & embrace “bribery” followed a DCCC study showing the word resonates more in battlegrounds

It’s also clearly stated in the Constitution as grounds 4 removing POTUS. Could we see it in impeachment articles?
LAFFRIOT!
Click to expand...

When the "bribery" charge fails, leftists will move on to something else. Possibly "treason."
 
Obscurity said:
More like Orange man is INEPT AF and so is his entire administration.

White racist nationalists are making immigration policy.
Anti education religious zealots are leading our dept of edu.
Anti environment capitalists are heading the epa.

It's a mockery and you guys are the players in this charade and have no idea you're being used.
Click to expand...

I keep seeing this kind of information being spewed out by posters like you, but I don't ever see any evidence for it. Funny that bit of happenstance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom