• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who is the Whistleblower, my opinion!

The whistleblower could be Hillary Clinton and it wouldn't matter.
 
trixare4kids said:
The WB has no legal right to have his identity withheld from the public. His only right under the wb protection act is job protection.
So now that you know that, tell us again, why Schiff won't allow him to testify?
Click to expand...

Job Protection. You just posted it.
 
independentusa said:
After giving this a lot of thought I believe the WB is not a Dem or having worked for Biden as all of the GOP is guessing or at least hoping. I think if it was the WB would be on every talk show and already finished a book for the usual book tour. No, I think that the WB is someone who is GOPer and maybe even a Trumpster, but one with a conscience who could not let what he heard go without reporting it. If anyone remembers Watergate and deep Throat, the person who said he was Deep Throat was not a Dem, but a Nixon Republican. Another GOper who knew something and had to report it back then in the only way he could, through the media. Today we have whistleblower laws which safeguard the names of those who report suspected wrong doing and the WB used it as he should have. If he is a GOPER is is even moreimportant to keep his name a secret so as to allow the WB to go on with his life without the threats of firing or even death. So in my opinion, the WB is a GOPer if not a Trumpster. What do you think?
Click to expand...

Anyone hear from Rudy lately? Hmmm, maybe he's the WB. Afterall, isn't the RW just pulling names from the backside?
 
Gina said:
My thoughts, exactly. Doesn't matter. Even one iota.
Click to expand...
It matters a lot to the opposition's propaganda. Their objective won't be to answer for and hold accountable the president's inappropriate behavior. It won't even be to deny or affirm the quid pro quo. Their objective will be yet another broad attack on the left for witch hunts at large and hence a mass exoneration of trump on all counts. If they paint the situation as yet another witch hunt by the tirelessly anti trump left, people will believe it. It's amazing too, that they wont believe he is just not appropriate for the role of president the way he operates. It's an information campaign. Control the information and narrative and people will continue to follow.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 
dairyair said:
Huh? My point is the reason you gave why the WB should remain anonymous.

How can you miss your very own point?
Click to expand...

Uh, she's a Trump supporter. It's all emotion and tangent making. They're not trying to make sense. Never were.
 
Yakshi said:
Uh, she's a Trump supporter. It's all emotion and tangent making. They're not trying to make sense. Never were.
Click to expand...

That posters seemed to be above the pure emotive reactions of a trumper.
 
dairyair said:
Huh? My point is the reason you gave why the WB should remain anonymous.

How can you miss your very own point?
Click to expand...

No, that was not my point. The WB's job is protected, not his identity by law.
 
independentusa said:
After giving this a lot of thought I believe the WB is not a Dem or having worked for Biden as all of the GOP is guessing or at least hoping. I think if it was the WB would be on every talk show and already finished a book for the usual book tour. No, I think that the WB is someone who is GOPer and maybe even a Trumpster, but one with a conscience who could not let what he heard go without reporting it. If anyone remembers Watergate and deep Throat, the person who said he was Deep Throat was not a Dem, but a Nixon Republican. Another GOper who knew something and had to report it back then in the only way he could, through the media. Today we have whistleblower laws which safeguard the names of those who report suspected wrong doing and the WB used it as he should have. If he is a GOPER is is even more important to keep his name a secret so as to allow the WB to go on with his life without the threats of firing or even death. So in my opinion, the WB is a GOPer if not a Trumpster. What do you think?
Click to expand...

Whatever he/she is, democrat or republican, they will be damned and demeaned, threatened and harassed for a long time to come by the Cult of Trump. It will most definitely be a "crooked, lazy, loser, with small hands." These cultists have degraded decorated veterans, Gold Star survivors, prisoners of war, dedicated lifetime civil servants, and the list goes on and on and on and on and on and on............... Anyone who even dares question their Lord and Savior Comrade Trumpov, (praise be unto Him,) is the scourge of mankind to hear them tell the story. They are short on character and long on despicability.
 
trixare4kids said:
No, that was not my point. The WB's job is protected, not his identity by law.
Click to expand...

His/her job is not protected if outed.

They could be fired for wearing the wrong color clothes.
 
dairyair said:
His/her job is not protected if outed.

They could be fired for wearing the wrong color clothes.
Click to expand...

Are you feigning comprehension of a simple point? The wb's job is legally protected, and not his identity.

... oh geese, never mind.
 
trixare4kids said:
Are you feigning comprehension of a simple point? The wb's job is legally protected, and not his identity.

... oh geese, never mind.
Click to expand...

So you're saying a WB will never be fired and will have the job until he/she decides to retire?

Very very doubtful. They will be harassed to the point of wanting to quit or fired for having the wrong hair color. There's no protection.
They can never be fired with the excuse they were a WB.


oh geez, never mind. LOL.
 
Whistle blower is protected when they lie?

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom