• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump’s offense impeachable as it comes

calamity

Privileged
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
160,900
Reaction score
57,840
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist
Asking Ukraine to investigate the Bidens is exactly the kind of misconduct the framers had in mind in introducing a check on misuse of power.
Ya think?

Trump’s action regarding Ukraine, which included demanding that Zelensky publicly announce a criminal investigation into the Bidens in exchange for an Oval Office meeting and the release of military aid to Ukraine, according to testimony in the impeachment inquiry by Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent and Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland, was about as impeachable as an offense can get. Therefore, waiting for an election — the very thing compromised by the offense — is not an option.

As a constitutional law professor, I am used to considering hypotheticals, but I do not need one here. Soliciting foreign intervention to undermine the integrity of the American electoral system is exactly the sort of misconduct the framers had in mind when they established the impeachment process in the Constitution.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...able-it-comes-so-no-it-cant-wait-an-election/

That, IMO, is about the gist of it. If this is not impeachable, nothing is.
 
I don't believe we would have this problem if an Independent special counsel had been appointed instead of a DoJ special counsel.
 
Do you really think Trump can be removed from office by pathological lying by the Democratic Party? Your OP is a deliberate, known outright lie.

The bigger question is did you start still another new thread #20+ on the same lie because you hate the other Democrats on the forum who already have started threads on that lie? Or is it that this topic really is about you, not Trump? :roll:
 
I don't believe we would have this problem if an Independent special counsel had been appointed instead of a DoJ special counsel.

Yeah, that worked out great for you with Mueller, didn't it? :lamo
 
Yeah, that worked out great for you with Mueller, didn't it? :lamo

That remains to be seen, there are dozens and dozens of impeachable actions in the Mueller report that I hope are included in the articles of impeachment. I want them to have so many charges that the nation is made aware of all the corruption that has gone on...
 
Ya think?



That, IMO, is about the gist of it. If this is not impeachable, nothing is.

But Hillary and the DNC paying a former British spy for dirt on Trump, dirt that he got from his former Russian counterparts , is OK. Such hypocrisy is always part of the democrats self rightousness.
 
But Hillary and the DNC paying a former British spy for dirt on Trump, dirt that he got from his former Russian counterparts , is OK. Such hypocrisy is always part of the democrats self rightousness.

"a former British spy" is not a "foreign government". But I see how you Trumpkins get confused easily. Foreign powers have political interests in results of our elections. Individual foreign citizen hired by a firm to dig up dirt - not so much and not nearly as important. (Plus of course it was conservatives that got the dirt from private US firm, Fusion GPS, which in turn got it from a former spy, well before Clinton got involved.)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom