• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

GOP releases list of witnesses for impeachment hearings

Only those who literally worship twump as a god would think that list is even remotely credible and/or relevant.

Still got that phallic-induced speech impediment I see.
 
That list is an extremely effective argument for why Republicans shouldn’t have subpoena power. They demanded that power, and have just announced that they can’t be trusted with it.

Ah yes...because the Dems have done such a bang-up job with what they've been doing.
 
No one forget that white Southern men have caused this mess.
 
So the GOP wants to turn this into a witch hunt on the Bidens in order to deflect from the criminal actions of Trump and company. The circus is back in town boys and Jim Jordan is the ringmaster/head clown.

So what you're saying is that the only person that's allowed to be investigated is Trump. I gotcha. A solid strategy that is sure to fool many ignorant and gullible people.
 
There's no way Sciffty is going to approve this list, but we can expect these same people to be called to the Senate, if there's a trial.

GOP releases list of witnesses for impeachment hearings

Notice the fear they have of anyone one on their team getting even a little bit of looking into? Trump can be subjected to an inquisition starting from before he was elected but don't dare even look at the glaringly obvious corruption with Joe, Hunter, and Ukraine.
 
If you don't think so, then you haven't been paying attention.

I have been. They made their decision back in 2016, as soon as Trump was elected. They are just trying to figure out how much smoke they can blow to distract everyone from it. Looks like they got you though.
 
I have been. They made their decision back in 2016, as soon as Trump was elected. They are just trying to figure out how much smoke they can blow to distract everyone from it. Looks like they got you though.

Trump did this to himself, Fishking.... the Democrats never surrounded him with a bunch of crooks, they never forced him to obstruct justice, abuse the power of the office, or engage in delusionally paranoid investigations partisan witch-hunts.

But hey, if you want to ignore the evidence and stick your head in the dirt, that's your choice.
 
Trump did this to himself, Fishking.... the Democrats never surrounded him with a bunch of crooks, they never forced him to obstruct justice, abuse the power of the office, or engage in delusionally paranoid investigations partisan witch-hunts.

But hey, if you want to ignore the evidence and stick your head in the dirt, that's your choice.

I see a lot of accusations but they always come up short. Hmmm....I say we just repeat them over and over again and people will believe them regardless of their lack of validity.
 
I see a lot of accusations but they always come up short. Hmmm....I say we just repeat them over and over again and people will believe them regardless of their lack of validity.

There's no need to... all you need to do is what the President advises - read the transcript.
 
Ah yes...because the Dems have done such a bang-up job with what they've been doing.

Well, actually...they've done an incredible job.
 
The Democrats can't impeach Trump and give Biden a free pass. So, you bet it is.

They can't impeach Biden. There is no ground or the House to stand on with regard to Biden. Is there no end to the utter ridiculous horse dung you are capable of posting?
 
So what you're saying is that the only person that's allowed to be investigated is Trump. I gotcha. A solid strategy that is sure to fool many ignorant and gullible people.

This is an impeachment investigation and that means Trump.

Trying to make this about Biden has no basis other than distraction and diversion.
 
We need to know if Biden needs to be impeached, if he wins the general election.

Its not my understanding the Hunter Biden intends running for anything.
 
The facts show otherwise that he did indeed commit a crime or crimes.

If that is truly the case, then he will be impeached. Lets see how this goes...
 
"Ha, Ha, that is very funny"

That is very funny because the longer this goes, the deeper the hole gets for Trump and his gang.

Most recent screw up....Mulvaney wants to join the Kuperman court action asking for a ruling on appearing before the House just as DonDon is claiming he is ordering Mulvaney to appear. Smooth guys, real smooth. The usual Trumpian disorganization rules as usual.

The only dif between the Trump gang and John Gotti's gang is that the dead bodies would already be floating in the Hudson if this goon squad was part of Gotti's gang and John himself would be packin' and checking it often to make sure it was loaded.
 
The GOP is like the NY Mafia who is trying to call witnesses "because Johnny in Baltimore may have done something too" during their NY trial for extortion.

Southern men are okay eith this.
 
There's no way Sciffty is going to approve this list, but we can expect these same people to be called to the Senate, if there's a trial.

GOP releases list of witnesses for impeachment hearings

It's little surprise that Schiffty would deny all of these. Just for the record, here are the people reported to have been included in the list.

  • Hunter Biden
  • Whistle blower
  • Nellie Ohr
  • Devon Archer
  • Alexandria Chalupa
  • Tim Morrison
  • Kurt Volker
  • David Hale
#3 & #5 are interesting, as it speaks to the inception of the Russian Collusion hoax, the Democrats eliciting dirt on Trump from the Ukrainians(#5) and other foreign sources (#3) - foreign interference in US elections anyone?

Yeah, Schiffty won't allow anything or anyone that might exonerate Trump or put him in a good light. I always thought that a trial, such as impeachment is, would include both sides' of the issue. Seems that this is too much to ask for from Democrats, something they are unwilling to risk or allow in these proceedings.

All previous impeachments had bi-partisan support. Interestingly enough there is bi-partisan support for NOT opening an impeachment inquire, yet the Democrats are driven to damage Trump in any way possible for the coming 2020 election, as their weak field of presidential candidates can't seem to manage to do so.
 
It's little surprise that Schiffty would deny all of these. Just for the record, here are the people reported to have been included in the list.

  • Hunter Biden
  • Whistle blower
  • Nellie Ohr
  • Devon Archer
  • Alexandria Chalupa
  • Tim Morrison
  • Kurt Volker
  • David Hale
#3 & #5 are interesting, as it speaks to the inception of the Russian Collusion hoax, the Democrats eliciting dirt on Trump from the Ukrainians(#5) and other foreign sources (#3) - foreign interference in US elections anyone?

Yeah, Schiffty won't allow anything or anyone that might exonerate Trump or put him in a good light. I always thought that a trial, such as impeachment is, would include both sides' of the issue. Seems that this is too much to ask for from Democrats, something they are unwilling to risk or allow in these proceedings.

All previous impeachments had bi-partisan support. Interestingly enough there is bi-partisan support for NOT opening an impeachment inquire, yet the Democrats are driven to damage Trump in any way possible for the coming 2020 election, as their weak field of presidential candidates can't seem to manage to do so.

When republicans hold a majority in the House then they can issue subpoenas again.
 
Back
Top Bottom