• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Which of president trumps policies...

ecofarm said:
Your vote is not the issue. Your slobbering adoration is the issue. Don't equate normal people with your worship. Don't try to hide behind them.
Click to expand...

So, you are calling 63 million people disgusting and un-American and think they will vote your way in 2020?
 
bullseyelqcs said:
To be fair, most of that 63 million dont adore the man....they felt he was a better choice than Hillary. That said, the adoration comes from a smaller subsection of that number. The larger part of of that number is what he should be concerned with. If hes turned off enough of them, his narrow wins in key states go away and him along with them.
Click to expand...

Accept for the fact that Trump is doing well in the polls in swing states and the majority of them are against impeachment.
 
Moderate Right said:
So, you are calling 63 million people disgusting and un-American and think they will vote your way in 2020?
Click to expand...

So you're gonna remain in denial about the slobbering sycophancy. I suppose that's best. Just pretend you're the same as every Trump voter. I couldn't have imagined someone using 'Trump voter' as a cover, but the internet is a strange place.
 
Moderate Right said:
Accept for the fact that Trump is doing well in the polls in swing states and the majority of them are against impeachment.
Click to expand...

Who do you think you are kidding besides yourself:

Screenshot_20191107-131648_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20191107-131321_Chrome.jpg

Not sure what that looks like to you, but to me it looks like Trump getting it handed to him by candidates that wont even make it to the stage for the last Democratic debate and that most people DO want him impeached and possibly removed from office.

You got something that shows otherwise, Id be happy to peruse it.
 
Excast said:
It's sad in some ways, but at least people are out there and honest about the ugliness in their hearts. When the toxicity is that transparent, instead of pretending they are motivated by God or a desire for small government or some such nonsense, it just lays things out in clearer terms. If someone believes Trump is great and loves the things he is done, that isn't anybody I want to waste my time on.
Click to expand...

I agree, I'm tired of scrolling thru page after page of posts from Mashmouth and friends and I couldn't care less about posts from others who waste their time debating them. I wish there was a forum for both moderate to conservative Democrats and Repubs who prefer not to be lead by a lying, racist white nationalist who's ruining our reputation around the world...
 
Moderate Right said:
So, you are calling 63 million people disgusting and un-American and think they will vote your way in 2020?
Click to expand...

Dude, aren't you the guy who said you would be fine with a pedophile in office instead of a Democrat? I'm not really sure you are the one to come forward looking for civility and wondering why people find Trump supporters disgusting.
 
Oborosen said:
His policies have helped people like my oldest niece, stay protected from being raped by illegal immigrants.
Click to expand...

So sorry about your youngest niece.
 
Rich2018 said:
Interesting since when Obama left office illegal immigration was at a low...its only gone UP since then.
Click to expand...

With how much your people are offering free crap, incentives, and protection. I'm not surprised.

Then again Obama did have to fluff his numbers to make himself look good on paper. So there are plenty of caveats to be made here.
 
mrjurrs said:
The point is that she is far more likely to be raped by an American (most likely someone she knows) than an immigrant.
Click to expand...

Yes, but rapes performed by illegal immigrants, among other crimes. Are something that still actually happens in the US, no matter how much people want to pretend that they don't.

Worst being is that some of them receive protection when they do commit a crime. Something that I'd really like to change at some point.
 
Stealers Wheel said:
Oh that's right! Rape by illegal immigrants is waaaay down under Trump! And that's the worst kind of rape. Much worse than rape by legal citizens and residents. Thank you Mr. President!
Click to expand...

You're the only one postulating that at this point. Guess that makes you the racist.
 
D_NATURED said:
Sick ****ing bigots have come out of the woodwork like roaches in the dark. Trump gave them the confidence to show themselves. When people get to read the things that conservative half wits write, it makes his re-election less likely.

You should be ashamed of pretty much everything that your struggling, pathetic mind conjures.
Click to expand...

Oh look, nothing but personal attacks and bile... go figure.
 
bongsaway said:
Have personally helped you and how?
Click to expand...

Small business tax breaks have helped me quite a bit, as well as my son's company start up. (basically taking over my clients)

I am officially retiring this year and converting my company to a 501c to help the low income people in my area with home repairs.

Time for me to pay it forward because the world has been very good to this 10th grade drop out.
 
Oborosen said:
You're the only one postulating that at this point. Guess that makes you the racist.
Click to expand...

You're the one expressing concern about immigrant rapists. You're so concerned that you just made up that nonsense, as if we wouldn't see it and mock you for it.
 
RetiredUSN said:
Small business tax breaks have helped me quite a bit, as well as my son's company start up. (basically taking over my clients)

I am officially retiring this year and converting my company to a 501c to help the low income people in my area with home repairs.

Time for me to pay it forward because the world has been very good to this 10th grade drop out.
Click to expand...

Admirable, can you share this with other republicans please?
 
RetiredUSN said:
Republicans are already more charitable than democrats.

U.S. Generosity
Click to expand...

And just when you seemed you were becoming reasonable.

You're correct, but it's a little more nuanced than that. This is from an opinion piece entitled, "Bleeding Heart Tightwads", that completely agrees with your claim, but it also makes clear that both conservatives and liberals have their preferred recipients and method of distribution. It seems most conservative charity goes to their churches, while liberals prefer their charity going directly to the needy, or through our secular government, cutting out the religious middle men;

...It’s true that religion is the essential reason conservatives give more, and religious liberals are as generous as religious conservatives. Among the stingiest of the stingy are secular conservatives.

According to Google’s figures, if donations to all religious organizations are excluded, liberals give slightly more to charity than conservatives do. But Mr. Brooks says that if measuring by the percentage of income given, conservatives are more generous than liberals even to secular causes.

In any case, if conservative donations often end up building extravagant churches, liberal donations frequently sustain art museums, symphonies, schools and universities that cater to the well-off. (It’s great to support the arts and education, but they’re not the same as charity for the needy. And some research suggests that donations to education actually increase inequality because they go mostly to elite institutions attended by the wealthy.)...

I applaud you, "paying it forward", but individual's contributions don't raise near enough money to cover the need. We just disagree that we should use taxes to help fellow Americans...
 
Stealers Wheel said:
You're the one expressing concern about immigrant rapists. You're so concerned that you just made up that nonsense, as if we wouldn't see it and mock you for it.
Click to expand...

The OP asked, so blame him. I'm just here to answer.
 
SoCal said:
And just when you seemed you were becoming reasonable.

You're correct, but it's a little more nuanced than that. This is from an opinion piece entitled, "Bleeding Heart Tightwads", that completely agrees with your claim, but it also makes clear that both conservatives and liberals have their preferred recipients and method of distribution. It seems most conservative charity goes to their churches, while liberals prefer their charity going directly to the needy, or through our secular government, cutting out the religious middle men;

...It’s true that religion is the essential reason conservatives give more, and religious liberals are as generous as religious conservatives. Among the stingiest of the stingy are secular conservatives.

According to Google’s figures, if donations to all religious organizations are excluded, liberals give slightly more to charity than conservatives do. But Mr. Brooks says that if measuring by the percentage of income given, conservatives are more generous than liberals even to secular causes.

In any case, if conservative donations often end up building extravagant churches, liberal donations frequently sustain art museums, symphonies, schools and universities that cater to the well-off. (It’s great to support the arts and education, but they’re not the same as charity for the needy. And some research suggests that donations to education actually increase inequality because they go mostly to elite institutions attended by the wealthy.)...

I applaud you, "paying it forward", but individual's contributions don't raise near enough money to cover the need. We just disagree that we should use taxes to help fellow Americans...
Click to expand...

Government is the least effective, or efficient way to do anything.
 
RetiredUSN said:
Government is the least effective, or efficient way to do anything.
Click to expand...

Yeah, my grandfather remembers back in 1929 how the private sector did such an awesome job protecting his life savings. Since then, no depositor who put their money in an FDIC insured account has lost a dime - ever. You know that FDIC is a government program, right? Banks have failed, but no depositor lost money.

Back in the 1950's no company or even consortium of companies were willing or able to expend the capital or manpower to achieve earth orbit. Nevertheless, it needed to be done. It cost trillions and our government did it. Now that the heavy lifting is done, a few private sector companies are capitalizing on what NASA learned. Today, everyone on the planet can enjoy worldwide telecommunications, GPS, and Internet access, all courtesy of the U.S. taxpayers.

Virtually every drug on the market, from pain relievers to chemotherapy, can find government funding in their genesis. Why? Because for every drug that makes it to the market, hundreds fail to make the cut. The private sector has no interest in funding the losers, so it falls to the government to bear those loses. You're welcome.

There is a mountain of evidence that Medicare is far more efficient than private sector insurance. Google it.
 
Stealers Wheel said:
Yeah, my grandfather remembers back in 1929 how the private sector did such an awesome job protecting his life savings. Since then, no depositor who put their money in an FDIC insured account has lost a dime - ever. You know that FDIC is a government program, right? Banks have failed, but no depositor lost money.

Back in the 1950's no company or even consortium of companies were willing or able to expend the capital or manpower to achieve earth orbit. Nevertheless, it needed to be done. It cost trillions and our government did it. Now that the heavy lifting is done, a few private sector companies are capitalizing on what NASA learned. Today, everyone on the planet can enjoy worldwide telecommunications, GPS, and Internet access, all courtesy of the U.S. taxpayers.

Virtually every drug on the market, from pain relievers to chemotherapy, can find government funding in their genesis. Why? Because for every drug that makes it to the market, hundreds fail to make the cut. The private sector has no interest in funding the losers, so it falls to the government to bear those loses. You're welcome.

There is a mountain of evidence that Medicare is far more efficient than private sector insurance. Google it.
Click to expand...

Find a way to pay for it and get back to us.

Liberals are already attacking Trump over the deficit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom