Well how about the Washington swamp?? Do you recognize that fact.Originally Posted by Grand Mal
Well how about the Washington swamp?? Do you recognize that fact.
So what is the checks and balances against a lying whistle blower? It would seem if you state you are a whistle blower, you can accuse anyone of anything.
So as a whistle blower, I know that Pelosi and Bernie had a threesome with a chicken. Dont you dare question or out me.
You tried this earlier and it was already explained. The complaint goes to the ICIG, who then determines if it is legitimate or not by independently corroborating it. If it is verifiable, then it is determined by the ICIG whether the complaint is urgent or not. The Trump-appointed ICIG not only found the complaint credible through independent verification, but also determined it was of an urgent nature due to its impact on National Security.
Make up as many false reports as you desire, but the system is designed to prevent them from going anywhere. Sorry champ.
claim3.jpg
Last edited by Condor060; 11-04-19 at 06:48 PM.
What is this? It is not legible. Do you have an actual link?
Yes, Trump has created a very deep swamp which includes most of the head including Barr and Pompeo
I am trying to get you a better copy
5 USC 2302 (b) 8 & 9 which were added to the USC as part of the Whistleblower Protection Act says nothing about the source of the information. It simply says “that the employee or applicant reasonably believes”
So no it seems first hand knowledge is not required.
Don't be a grammar nazi - Marcus Aurelius, Meditations, Book 1 #7
Only the current WB urgent concern complaint form is on the GOV website but I provided you with the website that shows the original complaint form and the changes to the new one.
Intel Community Secretly Nixed Whistleblower Demand Of First-Hand Info
I read the statute just now. You are correct.
Don't be a grammar nazi - Marcus Aurelius, Meditations, Book 1 #7
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote