• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NY Times Violates Journalist Ethics to Protect Hillary

Grim17

Battle Ready
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
34,478
Reaction score
17,282
Location
Southwestern U.S.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Without including a correction of any kind, the NY Times stealth edits their story published last Friday about Hillary Clinton accusing Tulsi Gabbard of being groomed by Russia.

As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words.


nytimes_stealthEdit.jpg
 
can't keep track of their lies
 
They obviously can't be mirror images lol.

Dumb, dumber, dumbest.
 
I just submitted a note to the NY Times telling them that they shouldn't make stealth changes like this instead of corrections.
 
Why didn't Hillary correct this immediately?
Anyone who listened to the podcast heard what she said. And what her spox said.
 
Why didn't Hillary correct this immediately?
Anyone who listened to the podcast heard what she said. And what her spox said.

Probably because the majority of us want Hillary to just go away.
 
Why didn't Hillary correct this immediately?
Anyone who listened to the podcast heard what she said. And what her spox said.

Hillary has her incorrect opinion. She isn't planning to correct it.

The corrections are by those who misrepresented what she said - Hillary said Republicans are grooming a Democrat for a third party run, but some wrongly said she said Russians were doing the grooming. But she also said and still says that Gabbard and Stein are Russian assets - a word with some vagueness, but basically a smear.
 
You know it’s funny that nyt wants to be taken seriously but they are not going to publish anything news worthy!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
You know it’s funny that nyt wants to be taken seriously but they are not going to publish anything news worthy!

Oh, the irony. Irony of the day award. Replace "nyt" with "TheRepublican".
 
Why doesn't Shrillary just get in the race? We all know she wants to. Maybe Martians will make her lose next time.
 
Why doesn't Shrillary just get in the race? We all know she wants to. Maybe Martians will make her lose next time.

Trump should be thanking Hillary and Comey daily.
 
I just submitted a note to the NY Times telling them that they shouldn't make stealth changes like this instead of corrections.

Well. That'll change their procedures.:roll:
 
Why doesn't Shrillary just get in the race? We all know she wants to. Maybe Martians will make her lose next time.

Hillary said she would get in the race if she thought she could win. Apparently she doesn't think she can win. Man, if she wound up being the nominee and lost to the Donald another time she would have no choice but to jump off a bridge and disappear forever. Or, she could ask Russia for asylum and be flat mates with Eric Snowden.
 
Without including a correction of any kind, the NY Times stealth edits their story published last Friday about Hillary Clinton accusing Tulsi Gabbard of being groomed by Russia.

As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words.

View attachment 67266781

The NYT unethical?????

This must be a first...
 
I just submitted a note to the NY Times telling them that they shouldn't make stealth changes like this instead of corrections.

:thumbs:
 
Why didn't Hillary correct this immediately?
Anyone who listened to the podcast heard what she said. And what her spox said.

Hillary's criminally insane.

And she was speaking for her criminally insane party when she unleashed on Tulsi.

Democrats intensely hate two things:

1) The truth

2) The only candidate they have who can beat Trump
 
Hillary said she would get in the race if she thought she could win. Apparently she doesn't think she can win. Man, if she wound up being the nominee and lost to the Donald another time she would have no choice but to jump off a bridge and disappear forever. Or, she could ask Russia for asylum and be flat mates with Eric Snowden.

I'm not sure that anything can make her go away. She's like a stubborn rash.
 
I'm not sure that anything can make her go away. She's like a stubborn rash.

It's very telling that not only do the left seem to believe that Trump will still be around for the 2020 election but that they are so worried about beating him that they are actually quietly considering bringing Hillary back.
 
It's very telling that not only do the left seem to believe that Trump will still be around for the 2020 election but that they are so worried about beating him that they are actually quietly considering bringing Hillary back.

Yes, they know two things:

1. Impeachment will ultimately fail.

2. They can't win next year, with the current crop. (They can't win with Hillary, either, but that's another story)
 
Yes, they know two things:

1. Impeachment will ultimately fail.

2. They can't win next year, with the current crop. (They can't win with Hillary, either, but that's another story)

The Dems need to get their act together. The GOP is dead. Trump needs more than his base.
 
Without including a correction of any kind, the NY Times stealth edits their story published last Friday about Hillary Clinton accusing Tulsi Gabbard of being groomed by Russia.

As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words.


View attachment 67266781

damn propagandist rag...

you all know why they did this right?

Hillary is going to join the race.

if there was video of her saying Russians, which i believe there is, keep it handy Reps
 
Back
Top Bottom