G7 Fiasco, Trump Lied Again

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by calamity

Yes, because there is no other place in the entire US which could possibly serve to host the G7 other than Trump's Florida Golf Resort :roll:

---

Mulvaney said they looked at tons of places before deciding on Doral. How come they haven't released the list of all these other places? And why not just go to property #2 as a default?

Probably because he lied about that too. They only considered Doral, because it's what his highness wanted.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eriech

Will be interesting to compare and contrast the venue that is ultimately chosen over what could have been at Doral.

Wonder if Democrats in the media will think so too.....

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

---

History shows the Trump Organization cares more about profit than even the Donald’s safety.


Secret Service command post leaves Trump Tower over lease dispute - Business Insider

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by humbolt

That rant has absolutely nothing whatever to do with the subject here.

I honestly don't give a rat's ass about the G7. It can be held at a local Salvation Army auditorium for all I care.

It's just nuts to assume there's some corrupt ulterior motive on Trump's part before the facts are known, not the least of which is that it would be illegal for Trump to profit from it.

As I said, it took more mental effort for you to find the letters on your keyboard than you put into your post, I'm being kind in putting it that way.

---

It's not insane to assume a corrupt intent. He has displayed corrupt intent his entire life.

Only the blind would try and debate this with me.

Turn your ****ing filter off.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lurchadams

I agree that we can obtain verifiable quotes from comparable properties. That's not the issue.

So.. I'll ask one last time: Do you think trump will actually quote the actual cost and then show the world the actual invoices from the event? Based on how "transparent and truthful" trump has been in the past? To borrow your phrase: "Oh for Pete's sake!".

---

I don't know whether he will or not and, frankly, I don't care. If it's done for at or below the rates we know about then it saves the taxpayers money and THAT is my primary concern.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by akyron

We will see where G7 ends up and can make an educated guess. Unless you think public room costs are classified.

---

As I keep saying: had trump personally hosted the event, the actual costs would not be disclosed.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lutherf

I don't know whether he will or not and, frankly, I don't care. If it's done for at or below the rates we know about then it saves the taxpayers money and THAT is my primary concern.

---

And after the event at trump's property is done, how will you verify what the cost to the taxpayer actually was?

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lutherf

I don't know whether he will or not and, frankly, I don't care. If it's done for at or below the rates we know about then it saves the taxpayers money and THAT is my primary concern.

---

Let the record show, that you don't give a **** about law.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pound4abrown

Let the record show, that you don't give a **** about law.

---

I absolutely care about the law and I absolutely HATE when it's abused for the purpose of ****ing over someone you disagree with politically.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tres borrachos

Can you please tell us what the "at cost" is?

What is "cost" at Doral today exactly?

---

I truly don't know what the cost of operating such a place might be. I'm sure those who manage such places have a handle on it.

I am, however, fairly aware of how base costs are fluffed up, so I assume those who manage such places and events are very well aware of such things.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lutherf

I absolutely care about the law and I absolutely HATE when it's abused for the purpose of ****ing over someone you disagree with politically.

---

And yet, here you are telling those that disagree with you that the only thing you care about is saving money, but you can't tell us how much, because Trump never gave any figures.
So please spare me the indignation about your selective love of law. It comes across as awfully hollow.