• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump’s Quid Pro Quo Is Unconstitutional

Bizarre that you don't think that a president of the united states who uses extortion to help himself win the next election is such a bad thing. That's how far down into the gutter Trump has brought you.

You don't seem to mind that Obama used foreign sources to illegally investigate the Trump campaign. But, then you wouldn't. Would you? You're just mad because it didn't work...lol
 
There's only one problem...

Trump isn't urging anyone to find evidence against his opponent. He's trying to find evidence about actions by the Obama administration. Obama isn't his opponent anymore.

It would still be bribery
 
Seriously? I'm not a constitutional scholar by any stretch of the imagination so at some point I have to believe someone who knows more than me on the subject.

It appears it's in common agreement Trump asking for 'considerations' from other countries about one of his political opponents is frowned upon. Abuse of power I think I keep hearing it called.

Do you really believe saying things like show me, prove it will have any bearing on the outcome of the impeachment inquiry?

I guess what you are saying once again is all the folks who think it's wrong can just go take a long walk off a short plank. Prove it, show me, waa waa waa.

But, no one can point to the actual text of The Constitution that proves he broke the law.

Just because some anti-Trumper said it, don't mean **** to me. I'm not a sheep. They're going to have to prove it.
 
You don't seem to mind that Obama used foreign sources to illegally investigate the Trump campaign. But, then you wouldn't. Would you? You're just mad because it didn't work...lol

If trump has evidence let him indict obama
 
There was no quid pro quo so this thread is moot. Or, if you prefer - a nothingburger.

They've admitted to it on the air, at least three or four times now, that there was QPQ, although that's not necessary for your god, twump, to have committed very serious crimes.
 
But, no one can point to the actual text of The Constitution that proves he broke the law.

Just because some anti-Trumper said it, don't mean **** to me. I'm not a sheep. They're going to have to prove it.
Nobody can even point to the actual quid pro quo offer. It's all "we KNOW what Trump meant . . ." , or "of course it's bribery this is Trump we're talking about".
 
They've admitted to it on the air, at least three or four times now, that there was QPQ, although that's not necessary for your god, twump, to have committed very serious crimes.
No, they haven't. You guys are delusional.
 
Nobody can even point to the actual quid pro quo offer. It's all "we KNOW what Trump meant . . ." , or "of course it's bribery this is Trump we're talking about".

Javelin missles for investigation into Biden




Bribery
 
Javelin missles for investigation into Biden




Bribery
LOL, you guys are creative, I'll give you that. Desperate, but creative. Channeling Joe again eh? Ideological "truth" over facts, eh?
 
No, they haven't. You guys are delusional.

Yes, they have. Your god, twump, twice and Mulvaney at least once. But, again, there need not have been any QPQ in the first place for your god, twump, to have committed very serious crimes.

This all seems quite confusing for you, and that's sadfun.
 
I'm sure they'll find it somewhere in there...After all to leftist wingnuts, the Constitution should be a "living document".

The same people who wrote the Constitution also agree the Constituion should be modified and rewritten to adjust new or unforeseen grievances. That's why the laws written into the Constitution are called "amendments."
 
Yes, they have. Your god, twump, twice and Mulvaney at least once. But, again, there need not have been any QPQ in the first place for your god, twump, to have committed very serious crimes.

This all seems quite confusing for you, and that's sadfun.
Sorry, nope.
 
Wake me up when the House, specifically that other lunatic... Pelosi, has the courage to put up a vote for Articles of Impeachment based on the OP or the source article’s statements.

Find any article you want, find 100 or more of them, meaningless until House Democrats do something other than avoid a vote on the floor of the House.

This part is called 'an inquiry'.
What you're whining about is called 'hearings' and that won't come until after the inquiry.

Glad we could have this little talk.
 
LOL, you guys are creative, I'll give you that. Desperate, but creative. Channeling Joe again eh? Ideological "truth" over facts, eh?

Javelin missles for investigation into Biden




Bribery
 
Sorry, nope.

LOL! You can clench your tiny fists white in impotent rage and shake them at the sky in frustration, but it won't change what rational, sober adults collectively recognize as this thin called 'reality'.

You should check it out some day. twump and Mulvaney did exactly what I said they did, and it's all caught on video.

Sadfun!
 
Yes, they have. Your god, twump, twice and Mulvaney at least once. But, again, there need not have been any QPQ in the first place for your god, twump, to have committed very serious crimes.

This all seems quite confusing for you, and that's sadfun.

LOL!!

Do you hear yourself talk?

"We have evidence of a crime...but even if it's not a crime, Trump has committed crimes."
 
Back
Top Bottom