• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Clinton suggests Russia grooming Gabbard to run as third-party 2020 candidate

Lutherf

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
49,466
Reaction score
55,138
Location
Tucson, AZ
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Clinton suggests Russia grooming Gabbard to run as third-party 2020 candidate | TheHill


Hillary Clinton appeared to suggest that Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) is the “favorite of the Russians” to win the 2020 presidential election and is being groomed by Moscow to run as a third-party candidate against the eventual Democratic nominee.

In an interview on the podcast “Campaign HQ,” the former secretary of State warned that the Russian government was poised to once again meddle in the U.S. presidential election through online disinformation efforts and by encouraging a third-party challenger to stir chaos in the contest.

When I was growing up we had to be on the lookout for commies all over the place. Pete Seeger was a commie, Orson Welles was a commie, Zero Mostel wasn't just a commie but he even played a Russian on stage.

Just a few years ago it was Trump and his supporters that were commies...or at least "Russian assets".

Now it's Democrats who don't toe the party line that are commies...or "Russian assets".

What's funny about this whole thing, however, is that the Democrats that DO toe the party line sound more and more every day JUST like those commies we were supposed to be looking out for 50 years ago.

 
To me they sound more like the McCarthy-ites. The colors even work since MAGA hats are red.
 
Russian interference was and is real. The longer people pretend it's a myth, the longer we get ****ed by Putin.
 
The 2020 version of the 2016 "get Bernie" scheme.

And people actually think the Dem rank and file will be choosing their nominee.

LOL!!
 
To me they sound more like the McCarthy-ites. The colors even work since MAGA hats are red.
@ Haymarket You do realize "they" are Democrats here, right?

It's a good comparison. Today's Democrats sound like 1950's McCarthy Republicans. I'm glad I thought of it.
 
Last edited:
Bat **** crazy is as bat **** crazy does... (this is sad, pathetic really, that this is the conversation we end up having because of some new Hillary comment.)
 
The 2020 version of the 2016 "get Bernie" scheme.

And people actually think the Dem rank and file will be choosing their nominee.

LOL!!


the DNC top brass and only the DNC TB will decide who their candidate is.

they can't trust the mor.. errr, rank and file, at the bottom.
 
What's funny about this whole thing, however, is that the Democrats that DO toe the party line sound more and more every day JUST like those commies we were supposed to be looking out for 50 years ago.

Using a right-wing rag is one level of hypocrisy, but claiming the Dems are commies really puts it on another level of hypocrisy.

Aren't you the guy with that stupid "communist goals in the congressional record" routine?
 
Russian interference was and is real. The longer people pretend it's a myth, the longer we get ****ed by Putin.

One need not say the Russians didn't try anything at all in order to say the obsession with naming people as "Russian assets" is bat**** lunacy.
 
The Hill is not a right-wing rag, but if you think so here is a report from the AP

Hillary Clinton implies Gabbard is favored by Russia

Gabbard is favored by Russia because that's the means to sow the greatest discord. The evidence is undeniable and the reasoning obvious even to a moron.

That is not calling her an asset. The right wing rag made that up. And people that know nothing about this believe the rag.
 
When I was growing up we had to be on the lookout for commies all over the place. Pete Seeger was a commie, Orson Welles was a commie, Zero Mostel wasn't just a commie but he even played a Russian on stage.

Remind me, wasn't it mostly conservatives who were obsessed with communists and homosexuals?

FDR was pushing a second New Deal with guaranteed jobs for everyone. Conservatives were able to stall the progressive movement with the red scare and labeling progressive ideas "socialist."

But it is a fact that the Russians are promoting Tulsi. I don't believe she's cooperating with them.
 
One need not say the Russians didn't try anything at all in order to say the obsession with naming people as "Russian assets" is bat**** lunacy.

She did no such thing. Stop believing political rags.
 
She did no such thing. Stop believing political rags.

Besides the fact that indeed, she did call people Russian assets (her own words), I wasn't talking about her specifically.
 
Gabbard is favored by Russia because that's the means to sow the greatest discord. The evidence is undeniable and the reasoning obvious even to a moron.

That is not calling her an asset. The right wing rag made that up. And people that know nothing about this believe the rag.

But I was watching CNN and I was shocked when one of their analysts called her a "Puppet of the Russian government." I felt that was going way too far.

I think it was dumb for her to visit Assad. Assad is a monster who used chemical weapons and worked with Russia to cover it up by blowing up a hospital full of victims. We're talking about extreme evil.
 
Remind me, wasn't it mostly conservatives who were obsessed with communists and homosexuals?

FDR was pushing a second New Deal with guaranteed jobs for everyone. Conservatives were able to stall the progressive movement with the red scare and labeling progressive ideas "socialist."

But it is a fact that the Russians are promoting Tulsi. I don't believe she's cooperating with them.

Well, since we have a dozen of so commies running for the Democrat nomination I figure we weren't concerned enough!
 
Besides the fact that indeed, she did call people Russian assets (her own words), I wasn't talking about her specifically.

Asset has more than one definition. It doesn't only mean "intelligence agent".

This is coming from the people that told us citizen means agent, so perhaps I should not be surprised.
 
Asset has more than one definition. It doesn't only mean "intelligence agent".

This is coming from the people that told us citizen means agent, so perhaps I should not be surprised.

And yet, one still need not claim there's no Russian attempt at interference to call an obsession with naming all kinds of people Russian assets the bat**** lunacy it is.

You really should save the gaslighting for people it works on.
 
And yet, one still need not claim there's no Russian attempt at interference to call an obsession with naming all kinds of people Russian assets the bat**** lunacy it is.

You really should save the gaslighting for people it works on.

You should stop believing wing rags and their politically convenient interpretations. Or join the crowd that claims Trump called nazis "fine people".
 
You should stop believing wing rags and their politically convenient interpretations. Or join the crowd that claims Trump called nazis "fine people".

As I said, you should save the gaslighting for people it works on. You've done some very poor work today. Take the weekend to recoup.
 
As I said, you should save the gaslighting for people it works on. You've done some very poor work today. Take the weekend to recoup.

Believing Hillary called Gabbard and Stein Russian agents is disconnected from reality.
 
Believing Hillary called Gabbard and Stein Russian agents is disconnected from reality.

And so is pretending I said she did, but that's how gaslighting works.

Look, you're cute, but I ain't interested no more. Later.
 
Clinton suggests Russia grooming Gabbard to run as third-party 2020 candidate | TheHill




When I was growing up we had to be on the lookout for commies all over the place. Pete Seeger was a commie, Orson Welles was a commie, Zero Mostel wasn't just a commie but he even played a Russian on stage.

Just a few years ago it was Trump and his supporters that were commies...or at least "Russian assets".

Now it's Democrats who don't toe the party line that are commies...or "Russian assets".

What's funny about this whole thing, however, is that the Democrats that DO toe the party line sound more and more every day JUST like those commies we were supposed to be looking out for 50 years ago.



Clinton's unlikely claim notwithstanding, our entire law enforcement and intelligence community concluded that Russians interfered in our elections in 2016 and they're interfering right now. Mueller said that in his report and he said it in the hearing.

At a certain point, you have to ask yourself what you get out of denying or minimizing it.
 
And so is pretending I said she did, but that's how gaslighting works.

Look, you're cute, but I ain't interested no more. Later.

So you didn't claim Hillary was suggesting they work for the Russians?

Because she wasn't.

And believing that is stupid.
 
One need not say the Russians didn't try anything at all in order to say the obsession with naming people as "Russian assets" is bat**** lunacy.
Which of these facts is false?

1) Tulsi Gabbard has, repeatedly, downplayed Russian aggression and has received campaign donations from Russian sympathizers

2) A now exposed Russian troll wrote a positive op-ed about Gabbard for her pro-Assad positions.

3) Russia promoted Tulsi soon after she announced her candidacy.

4) Russian bots likely manipulated Google searches for Tulsi during Dem debates


Which of those are not true?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom