• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lindsey Graham seems to be trying to intimidate whistleblowers!

haymarket said:
So you cannot identify any LIE - only a difference of opinion or judgment. Typical conservative BS.

The Mueller report has such evidence as things like the public invitation to Russia clearly demonstrates as did the meeting at Trump Tower between top campaign officials and Russians and the over 100 other incidents of contact between Russian and the Trump campaign. Mueller simply drew the wrong conclusions and made serious mistakes and gave Trump the benefit of the doubt.

Schiff always has been right and he makes an excellent case for his judgement.
Click to expand...


Is that why the Washington Post bestowed him 4 Pinocchios ?!? :lamo
 
joko104 said:
The fanatical attempt of the Democratic Party to erase the Bill Of Rights and work a massive fraud is off the cliff.

OF COURSE a witness can not testify in writing.
No, an accuser can not have his lawyer doing the testimony and cross examination answers for the witness.
No, an accuser can not pretend he is a mute and can only communicate in writing.
Everyone - certainly the accused - has a right to see the body language and facial expressions - which also are a manner of communicating.
No, a witnesses has days to answer questions - delaying each step of the cross examination by weeks, months, years.
Click to expand...

All Trump has to do is to release the evidence to clear himself like the FULL transcript of his call(s) to Ukraine. The longer he waits the more guilty he looks. This obsession with the WB also makes Trump look more guilty by the day. Innocent people welcome WB's.
 
independentusa said:
Lindsey Graham Says He'll Out Whistleblower If Trump Is Impeached
There is no reason that the whistleblowers need to be questioned in public. It is understood that they will testify and be cross examined by the GOP, but why in public. The only reason to out the whistleblowers is to try and intimidate them further as Trump has done so by calling them traitors and hinting they ought to be killed. Of course Graham is himself so intimidated by Trump for some unknown reason that he would do anything that Trump tells him to including bringing about the deaths of the Whistleblowers as they have had many death threats. The real question is to me, are there not laws against intimidating witnesses?
Click to expand...
**** Lindsey Graham. He sold his soul when he super glued his lips to Trump’s keister.

If he outs a whistleblower, I sincerely hope he is charged.
 
joko104 said:
The fanatical attempt of the Democratic Party to erase the Bill Of Rights and work a massive fraud is off the cliff.

OF COURSE a witness can not testify in writing.
No, an accuser can not have his lawyer doing the testimony and cross examination answers for the witness.
No, an accuser can not pretend he is a mute and can only communicate in writing.
Everyone - certainly the accused - has a right to see the body language and facial expressions - which also are a manner of communicating.
No, a witnesses has days to answer questions - delaying each step of the cross examination by weeks, months, years.
Click to expand...
You’re confusing Congressional hearings with a court of law. Different entities with different rules. Do yourself a favor and learn the differences to avoid posting ignorance.
 
Barnacle said:
Is that why the Washington Post bestowed him 4 Pinocchios ?!? :lamo
Click to expand...

Wow, 4?

I went to Washington Post and I counted 232 Pinocchios all before Trump became President, and then their website stopped displaying tags properly after I had scrolled down so far, so I decided to stop counting.
 
haymarket said:
You would hope we are more enlightened that that. But maybe Lindsey knows his state voters better than we do.
Click to expand...

Very true. Guess I would like to think it wouldn't matter. There are several real reasons not to re-elect him.
 
haymarket said:
You have to wonder if all those rumors about his private life have some substance to them and if Trump is using that as leverage with him?
Click to expand...

Ooo, what rumors? Do tell. :)
 
Barnacle said:
Yeah ... the name of the child caught in a lie is ... pencil-neck Schiff. :lamo
Click to expand...

Spastically you’re response is that of a toddler?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
joko104 said:
The fanatical attempt of the Democratic Party to erase the Bill Of Rights and work a massive fraud is off the cliff.

OF COURSE a witness can not testify in writing.
No, an accuser can not have his lawyer doing the testimony and cross examination answers for the witness.
No, an accuser can not pretend he is a mute and can only communicate in writing.
Everyone - certainly the accused - has a right to see the body language and facial expressions - which also are a manner of communicating.
No, a witnesses has days to answer questions - delaying each step of the cross examination by weeks, months, years.
Click to expand...

Why are you talking about testifying in writing. I said they should not be questioned in public. I never said anything about writing. Read the OP please before you write a message.
 
Barnacle said:
Our Miss Lindsay is a total nutcase ... we know (grin). But to your other points:

A CIA agent fearing for his life ... give me a break, pleeeease. :lol:

Schiff had said the leaking WB would be available for questioning, but behind closed doors only. Okay ... until ...

A few days ago the WB lawyers asked whether it is possible to have him testify in writing. Say what? And today ...

On Face-the-Nation Schiff announced that the WB is no longer needed because the president's call is the best evidence.

The invisible WB has disappeared into the night ...

The end.

:lamo
Click to expand...

The WB will be called to testify in the Senate if Moscow Mitch actually holds a true trial. The fact that outing a WB is against the law holds no worries for the GOP as they do not believe that laws apply to them.
 
Barnacle said:
That he has irrefutable evidence that Trump colluded with Russia ... (I think we've been waiting now for 2 years for his evidence.) ...

and that the leaking WB is gonna testify behind closed doors in person.
Click to expand...

Everyone with a brain knows it was the Russians and Putin who interfered with our 2016 election. Only the dumbest trumpster would believe otherwise. The idea that Ukraine could afford even to do all of the things that the Russians did should let everyone know it was the Russians, unless you are stupid or such a Trump cultist that you do as Trump says. He told his followers not to believe your eyes or ears, just Trump.
 
CaughtInThe said:
Why wouldn't these thugs intimidate the whistleblower?

They're acting like the mob in every other way.
Click to expand...

Biggie Smalls said it perfectly:

At my arraignment, note to the plaintiff
Your daughters tied up in a Brooklyn basement
Face it, not guilty, thats how I stay filthy
Richer than Richie until you n***** come and get me.
 
Moot said:
Ooo, what rumors? Do tell. :)
Click to expand...

The speculation is about his personal lifestyle - of which I have nothing to present, verify or deny.
 
There are real whistle blowers, and then there are crooked democrat liars that claim to be whistle blowers. Yes it is that simple.
 
independentusa said:
Lindsey Graham Says He'll Out Whistleblower If Trump Is Impeached
There is no reason that the whistleblowers need to be questioned in public. It is understood that they will testify and be cross examined by the GOP, but why in public. The only reason to out the whistleblowers is to try and intimidate them further as Trump has done so by calling them traitors and hinting they ought to be killed. Of course Graham is himself so intimidated by Trump for some unknown reason that he would do anything that Trump tells him to including bringing about the deaths of the Whistleblowers as they have had many death threats. The real question is to me, are there not laws against intimidating witnesses?
Click to expand...

Jesus Christ. How much more ignorant can Graham get?
 
independentusa said:
Lindsey Graham Says He'll Out Whistleblower If Trump Is Impeached
There is no reason that the whistleblowers need to be questioned in public. It is understood that they will testify and be cross examined by the GOP, but why in public. The only reason to out the whistleblowers is to try and intimidate them further as Trump has done so by calling them traitors and hinting they ought to be killed. Of course Graham is himself so intimidated by Trump for some unknown reason that he would do anything that Trump tells him to including bringing about the deaths of the Whistleblowers as they have had many death threats. The real question is to me, are there not laws against intimidating witnesses?
Click to expand...

The whistleblower voided his protection by getting direction on what to say and do when he went to his commander, Adam Schiff, prior to filing the complaint.
 
It could be hard for the whistleblower to testify if there is no whistleblower at all and gossip-monger Dossier #2 was written by an Obama hangover TDS group.
 
independentusa said:
Everyone with a brain knows it was the Russians and Putin who interfered with our 2016 election. Only the dumbest trumpster would believe otherwise. The idea that Ukraine could afford even to do all of the things that the Russians did should let everyone know it was the Russians, unless you are stupid or such a Trump cultist that you do as Trump says. He told his followers not to believe your eyes or ears, just Trump.
Click to expand...

Do you think "the Russians and Putin" can force you to vote for Donald Trump again in 2020?
 
I don't understand why only one side is allowed to say "whatever it takes".
 
tres borrachos said:
Jesus Christ. How much more ignorant can Graham get?
Click to expand...

source.gif
 
ocean515 said:
The whistleblower voided his protection by getting direction on what to say and do when he went to his commander, Adam Schiff, prior to filing the complaint.
Click to expand...

Oh sure, that’s how it works, no wonder we have a corrupt and evil president.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
joko104 said:
Do you think "the Russians and Putin" can force you to vote for Donald Trump again in 2020?
Click to expand...

No, that’s why you are going to lose, they can try but we know what they are doing now. Just like we know what you are doing. I bet that game was fun when you played it with just the bubble buddies.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom