• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tulsi over Warren over Biden.

E

Exquisitor

Educator
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Messages
13,003
Reaction score
2,634
Location
UP of Michigan
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Exquisitor said:
Tulsi over Warren over Biden:

I didn't dare topple Biden, but now that Warren's in the lead, Tulsi has a chance.

Tulsi is the only other Candidate who can win against Trump astrologically than Biden and Sanders.

Tulsi 5, Trump 5, Warren 1, the boys 7.

The statistical model is sound, but unlike most astrologers, I believe it can be upset.

https://www.debatepolitics.com/us-el...elections.html

astrological qualifications of the Candidates
Click to expand...
Shouldnt this be in the CT forum?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
trouble13 said:
Shouldnt this be in the CT forum?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I thought about putting it in US Elections where threads stick around longer, but fewer people read, but put it here in hopes it would catch on.
 
Wut....
 
Exquisitor said:
I thought about putting it in US Elections where threads stick around longer, but fewer people read, but put it here in hopes it would catch on.
Click to expand...
A little bit off topic but because Halloween is coming up and its kind of in the same vane as your astrology theroy. The csndidates who mask has sold the most in an election year has historically won the election for something like the past 50 years.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Mycroft said:
Or in "The Lighter Side".

LOL!!
Click to expand...

On the lighter side of my ass!

It wouldn't be as funny there.

Come on, I was almost a standup comedian in Las Vegas.

Reports from the temporal realms is that Tulsi does a good job.

They all do good jobs.

But Harris is the most stern, because of her Saturn return.
 
trouble13 said:
A little bit off topic but because Halloween is coming up and its kind of in the same vane as your astrology theroy. The csndidates who mask has sold the most in an election year has historically won the election for something like the past 50 years.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

For the last hundred-twenty years the winner either had the highest score or the New Moon advantage.
 
When it comes to irrational faiths, astrology is the half-brother that got dropped on his head too many times growing up.
 
Mr Person said:
When it comes to irrational faiths, astrology is the half-brother that got dropped on his head too many times growing up.
Click to expand...

That's how we got Phrenology!
 
Mr Person said:
His posts are a bit "far out"....

Swimming In A Black Hole.
Click to expand...

Now what did I say there?

Just wait till the book comes out; "A Dark Tale; The False Prophet, He and the Beast."

I just come up with several paragraphs about black holes to add to the manuscript and the particles in my grey matter had fun pouring them back and forth.
 
Mr Person said:
When it comes to irrational faiths, astrology is the half-brother that got dropped on his head too many times growing up.
Click to expand...

Just like any faith, properly understood it makes sense, and is useful as part of an understanding.
 
Exquisitor said:
Tulsi over Warren over Biden:

I didn't dare topple Biden, but now that Warren's in the lead, Tulsi has a chance.

Tulsi is the only other Candidate who can win against Trump astrologically than Biden and Sanders.

Tulsi 5, Trump 5, Warren 1, the boys 7.

The statistical model is sound, but unlike most astrologers, I believe it can be upset.

https://www.debatepolitics.com/us-el...elections.html

astrological qualifications of the Candidates
Click to expand...

Gosh, that sure is stupid.
 
beefheart said:
Gosh, that sure is stupid.
Click to expand...

Stupid is to put up a likely loser to one who has a quarter of a chance (Trump has the New Moon before the election advantage).

Stupid to put up something of Krishna; yes.
 
Exquisitor said:
Now what did I say there?

Just wait till the book comes out; "A Dark Tale; The False Prophet, He and the Beast."

I just come up with several paragraphs about black holes to add to the manuscript and the particles in my grey matter had fun pouring them back and forth.
Click to expand...

See, that's the problem. Your 'several paragraphs' had absolutely nothing to do with the actual physics surrounding black holes. You were just making **** up. So too, here, you say some looney-tunes stuff about astrology.....a laughable bunk cult practice with no basis in empirical reality.

Far out, man. Far out.





Exquisitor said:
Just like any faith, properly understood it makes sense, and is useful as part of an understanding.
Click to expand...

Why don't you go do some divination on roadkill and share the wondrous results with us?

:roll:
 
Mr Person said:
See, that's the problem. Your 'several paragraphs' had absolutely nothing to do with the actual physics surrounding black holes. You were just making **** up. So too, here, you say some looney-tunes stuff about astrology.....a laughable bunk cult practice with no basis in empirical reality.

Far out, man. Far out.







Why don't you go do some divination on roadkill and share the wondrous results with us?

:roll:
Click to expand...

How when I came back from my travels, that is exactly what I did!

I put roadkill up on the bluff!

...You've prophesied!
 
Last edited:
Mr Person said:
See, that's the problem. Your 'several paragraphs' had absolutely nothing to do with the actual physics surrounding black holes. You were just making **** up. So too, here, you say some looney-tunes stuff about astrology.....a laughable bunk cult practice with no basis in empirical reality.

Far out, man. Far out.
Click to expand...

Probably not just making it up.

You haven't read the new paragraphs.

I'm schizophrenic, smoke hemp, take vitamins, practice yoga and marched beyond the stars.

Anything in creation if focus my mind on I can see, from singularities to the causal heavens beyond creation and the causal planet.

Its kind of a pain in the ass, but hey, its something most people don't get to do.

My recent excursion curved in an orbit near the singularity and I sponged up as much of the vision as I could.

There was the surface of the singularity which grew relative to myself as the spaceship of my soul came out of tiny warp.

Immediately I shrunk to limit in exercise for tiny contests.

People compacted into the surface of the singularity reached for the barrier to expansion, the surface tension, the line between full and overflowing.

Other features were identified and curves, constants and variables unknown abound.
 
Last edited:
Whom did the stars predict in 2016?
 
Trump said:
Whom did the stars predict in 2016?
Click to expand...

I do not know who had the new moon before the election advantage in 2016.

Trump is a 5 while Clinton is a -1.

I was manipulating the chart as I know how, and as can be done so that I am aware of how the widely swinging poles just before the election reflected an astrological re-set that caught me by surprise.

So I have become a firm believer, but only because I caught the DP link in the OP earlier this year.
 
Last edited:
Exquisitor said:
Tulsi over Warren over Biden:

I didn't dare topple Biden, but now that Warren's in the lead, Tulsi has a chance.

Tulsi is the only other Candidate who can win against Trump astrologically than Biden and Sanders.

Tulsi 5, Trump 5, Warren 1, the boys 7.

The statistical model is sound, but unlike most astrologers, I believe it can be upset.

https://www.debatepolitics.com/us-el...elections.html

astrological qualifications of the Candidates
Click to expand...

I'm not touching this post 'till I read my horoscope!
 
Chomsky said:
I'm not touching this post 'till I read my horoscope!
Click to expand...

Your ****ing horoscope in the newspaper is not astrology.

Reading your horoscope is like believing the world is six thousand years old or that the Earth is flat and we are the only life int he universe or that our big bang is the first or last.

Astrology means Christ is in every atom and as groups of these gather as planets they develop personalities that are not erroneously understood my mankind over the centuries.

Man looks up and sees glorious Jupiter and has a reaction to its energy and so also the signs are understood.

All this energy rotating around the sun has to have an influence on the matter of Earth, it is scientific; gravity.

Astrology is no more than the law of gravity.

What sets the election model above this interpretive science is that it is statistical.

It doesn't matter what any of it means, only that statistically, traits are proven to win and loose.

The personality of that seat, or the deity of the Earth etc say, I want that trait again and this trait I do not and statistically we find its preference over time and/or that certain traits are good for convincing the electorate.
 
Exquisitor said:
Your ****ing horoscope in the newspaper is not astrology.

Reading your horoscope is like believing the world is six thousand years old or that the Earth is flat and we are the only life int he universe or that our big bang is the first or last.

Astrology means Christ is in every atom and as groups of these gather as planets they develop personalities that are not erroneously understood my mankind over the centuries.

Man looks up and sees glorious Jupiter and has a reaction to its energy and so also the signs are understood.

All this energy rotating around the sun has to have an influence on the matter of Earth, it is scientific; gravity.

Astrology is no more than the law of gravity.

What sets the election model above this interpretive science is that it is statistical.

It doesn't matter what any of it means, only that statistically, traits are proven to win and loose.

The personality of that seat, or the deity of the Earth etc say, I want that trait again and this trait I do not and statistically we find its preference over time and/or that certain traits are good for convincing the electorate.
Click to expand...
I wish I would have read it. Maybe I would have seen this coming ...
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom