• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tulsi Puts DNC On Blast; Considers Boycotting Tuesday Debate

3leftsdoo

3leftsdoo

DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 21, 2019
Messages
18,105
Reaction score
5,175
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Tulsi Gabbard says she's had enough of Democrat corruption in 2020:



Citing DNC use of random polls and other arbitrary methods of steering support toward the most corrupt, conservative, corporate-approved candidates, she says she's considering a boycott of Tuesday's sham debate, or what she calls "reality show television."

As one of only two candidates on the Democrat side who could actually beat Trump - the other being Michelle Obama - the Democrat apparatus is dead set on silencing the only truly exceptional candidate currently running on either side of the aisle.

I hope she appears to kneecap both Warren and Biden as she did Harris, but she sounds like she's had enough of her own party's dirty dealing.

If the Democrats and their corporate cronies in the MSM are serious about winning in 2020 and opposing what they claim is the unwholesome corruption of Donald Trump, why aren't they supporting the only current candidate who can beat him?

Here's hoping she appears on Tuesday and calls a sham a sham.

:hm
 
Go ahead Tulsi, boycott! That'll show 'em!

:roll:
 
3leftsdoo said:
Tulsi Gabbard says she's had enough of Democrat corruption in 2020:



Citing DNC use of random polls and other arbitrary methods of steering support toward the most corrupt, conservative, corporate-approved candidates, she says she's considering a boycott of Tuesday's sham debate, or what she calls "reality show television."

As one of only two candidates on the Democrat side who could actually beat Trump - the other being Michelle Obama - the Democrat apparatus is dead set on silencing the only truly exceptional candidate currently running on either side of the aisle.

I hope she appears to kneecap both Warren and Biden as she did Harris, but she sounds like she's had enough of her own party's dirty dealing.

If the Democrats and their corporate cronies in the MSM are serious about winning in 2020 and opposing what they claim is the unwholesome corruption of Donald Trump, why aren't they supporting the only current candidate who can beat him?

Here's hoping she appears on Tuesday and calls a sham a sham.

:hm
Click to expand...


She is correct that corporations and the DNC is often a hindrance more than help. I wouldn't go so far as to say corrupt, its more that their influence tends towards known and more moderate candidates. I am not sure if that is good or bad objectively as my personal taste tends to be for the more ideological liberal candidates, so I feel that discomfort subjectively.

I think she is interpreting institutional bias as corruption, which, in my mind, means she is misinterpreting the situation wildly. However, if that is the case, the much more liberal younger DIY type voters will reject that in the future.
 
That she is even invited to the debate with her paltry poll numbers contradicts her contention.
 
tacomancer said:
She is correct that corporations and the DNC is often a hindrance more than help. I wouldn't go so far as to say corrupt, its more that their influence tends towards known and more moderate candidates. I am not sure if that is good or bad objectively as my personal taste tends to be for the more ideological liberal candidates, so I feel that discomfort subjectively.

I think she is interpreting institutional bias as corruption, which, in my mind, means she is misinterpreting the situation wildly. However, if that is the case, the much more liberal younger DIY type voters will reject that in the future.
Click to expand...

He's going to be next year's Jill Stein.
 
j brown's body said:
He's going to be next year's Jill Stein.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I can see that. I respect the hell out of Jill Stein, but she would also have never gotten elected in our current culture.
 
Tulsi Gabbard definitely didn't attend the CNN town hall night because she didn't want to be beat like a drum on her past views on LGBTQ.
 
3leftsdoo said:
As one of only two candidates on the Democrat side who could actually beat Trump - the other being Michelle Obama
Click to expand...
:lamo

According to virtually every single poll, any of the current Democrat candidates
And this stick 20FB289B-4060-45AB-894B-993FE554030C.jpg would beat Trump!

* 1% Gabbard won’t be missed.
 
3leftsdoo said:
Tulsi Gabbard says she's had enough of Democrat corruption in 2020:



Citing DNC use of random polls and other arbitrary methods of steering support toward the most corrupt, conservative, corporate-approved candidates, she says she's considering a boycott of Tuesday's sham debate, or what she calls "reality show television."

As one of only two candidates on the Democrat side who could actually beat Trump - the other being Michelle Obama - the Democrat apparatus is dead set on silencing the only truly exceptional candidate currently running on either side of the aisle.

I hope she appears to kneecap both Warren and Biden as she did Harris, but she sounds like she's had enough of her own party's dirty dealing.

If the Democrats and their corporate cronies in the MSM are serious about winning in 2020 and opposing what they claim is the unwholesome corruption of Donald Trump, why aren't they supporting the only current candidate who can beat him?

Here's hoping she appears on Tuesday and calls a sham a sham.

:hm
Click to expand...
She's not anywhere close to being a top runner

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 
Too bad she's not more popular, or she could split the party like Sanders in 2016.

As much as they despise Trump, between in-fighting like this, a lackluster pack of candidates, and the impeachment hysteria, it seems like they are working very hard to throw away their advantages for 2020.
 
tacomancer said:
Yeah, I can see that. I respect the hell out of Jill Stein, but she would also have never gotten elected in our current culture.
Click to expand...

Why respect Jill Stein? She's practically Russian stooge.
 
Lovebug said:
Getting her name in the news for free?
Click to expand...

Yeah, she's getting all of no coverage on TV for this, just some links on some websites.
 
3leftsdoo said:
Tulsi Gabbard says she's had enough of Democrat corruption in 2020:



Citing DNC use of random polls and other arbitrary methods of steering support toward the most corrupt, conservative, corporate-approved candidates, she says she's considering a boycott of Tuesday's sham debate, or what she calls "reality show television."

As one of only two candidates on the Democrat side who could actually beat Trump - the other being Michelle Obama - the Democrat apparatus is dead set on silencing the only truly exceptional candidate currently running on either side of the aisle.

I hope she appears to kneecap both Warren and Biden as she did Harris, but she sounds like she's had enough of her own party's dirty dealing.

If the Democrats and their corporate cronies in the MSM are serious about winning in 2020 and opposing what they claim is the unwholesome corruption of Donald Trump, why aren't they supporting the only current candidate who can beat him?

Here's hoping she appears on Tuesday and calls a sham a sham.

:hm
Click to expand...


Yeah well, I think Tulsi is working for the wrong team. She's dismissed.
 
3leftsdoo said:
Tulsi Gabbard says she's had enough of Democrat corruption in 2020:



Citing DNC use of random polls and other arbitrary methods of steering support toward the most corrupt, conservative, corporate-approved candidates, she says she's considering a boycott of Tuesday's sham debate, or what she calls "reality show television."

As one of only two candidates on the Democrat side who could actually beat Trump - the other being Michelle Obama - the Democrat apparatus is dead set on silencing the only truly exceptional candidate currently running on either side of the aisle.

I hope she appears to kneecap both Warren and Biden as she did Harris, but she sounds like she's had enough of her own party's dirty dealing.

If the Democrats and their corporate cronies in the MSM are serious about winning in 2020 and opposing what they claim is the unwholesome corruption of Donald Trump, why aren't they supporting the only current candidate who can beat him?

Here's hoping she appears on Tuesday and calls a sham a sham.

:hm
Click to expand...


Looks like things are so bad the GOP paid for plant has to make up some crap, no one was listening to her.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
3leftsdoo said:
Tulsi Gabbard says she's had enough of Democrat corruption in 2020
Click to expand...

And she officially has lost any hope she ever had of getting my vote. We don't have time for this crap people. The Trump administration is the single most corrupt, brazenly criminal administration in the history of the United States and she's over here crying about the fact that she's not more popular giving the other side talking points.

News Flash Tulsi. Your just not that popular. Democrats want winners not whiners.
 
3leftsdoo said:
Tulsi Gabbard says she's had enough of Democrat corruption in 2020:



Citing DNC use of random polls and other arbitrary methods of steering support toward the most corrupt, conservative, corporate-approved candidates, she says she's considering a boycott of Tuesday's sham debate, or what she calls "reality show television."

As one of only two candidates on the Democrat side who could actually beat Trump - the other being Michelle Obama - the Democrat apparatus is dead set on silencing the only truly exceptional candidate currently running on either side of the aisle.

I hope she appears to kneecap both Warren and Biden as she did Harris, but she sounds like she's had enough of her own party's dirty dealing.

If the Democrats and their corporate cronies in the MSM are serious about winning in 2020 and opposing what they claim is the unwholesome corruption of Donald Trump, why aren't they supporting the only current candidate who can beat him?

Here's hoping she appears on Tuesday and calls a sham a sham.

:hm
Click to expand...


Recall that she resigned from DNC in the last election cycle. She called out the DNC for cheating.

I like her style. The debates are just a Dog & Pony Show meant to impress the gullible.
 
Good I wish she would just go away.
I predict a change...she'll be an independent right after her next house seat election.
 
3leftsdoo said:
Tulsi Gabbard says she's had enough of Democrat corruption in 2020:



Citing DNC use of random polls and other arbitrary methods of steering support toward the most corrupt, conservative, corporate-approved candidates, she says she's considering a boycott of Tuesday's sham debate, or what she calls "reality show television."

As one of only two candidates on the Democrat side who could actually beat Trump - the other being Michelle Obama - the Democrat apparatus is dead set on silencing the only truly exceptional candidate currently running on either side of the aisle.

I hope she appears to kneecap both Warren and Biden as she did Harris, but she sounds like she's had enough of her own party's dirty dealing.

If the Democrats and their corporate cronies in the MSM are serious about winning in 2020 and opposing what they claim is the unwholesome corruption of Donald Trump, why aren't they supporting the only current candidate who can beat him?

Here's hoping she appears on Tuesday and calls a sham a sham.

:hm
Click to expand...


Tulsi needs to post.
 
Thoreau72 said:
Recall that she resigned from DNC in the last election cycle. She called out the DNC for cheating.

I like her style. The debates are just a Dog & Pony Show meant to impress the gullible.
Click to expand...

All the more reason Tulsi needs to show up. There's a lot of wild **** going on right now with the front runners, so you never know...
 
3leftsdoo said:
Tulsi Gabbard says she's had enough of Democrat corruption in 2020:



Citing DNC use of random polls and other arbitrary methods of steering support toward the most corrupt, conservative, corporate-approved candidates, she says she's considering a boycott of Tuesday's sham debate, or what she calls "reality show television."

As one of only two candidates on the Democrat side who could actually beat Trump - the other being Michelle Obama - the Democrat apparatus is dead set on silencing the only truly exceptional candidate currently running on either side of the aisle.

I hope she appears to kneecap both Warren and Biden as she did Harris, but she sounds like she's had enough of her own party's dirty dealing.

If the Democrats and their corporate cronies in the MSM are serious about winning in 2020 and opposing what they claim is the unwholesome corruption of Donald Trump, why aren't they supporting the only current candidate who can beat him?

Here's hoping she appears on Tuesday and calls a sham a sham.

:hm
Click to expand...


She reminds of that GOP operative who made up crap about Al Franken.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
3leftsdoo said:
Tulsi Gabbard says she's had enough of Democrat corruption in 2020
Click to expand...

OR she's tired of polling so low, and wants to play the pity card.

Citing DNC use of random polls and other arbitrary methods of steering support toward the most corrupt, conservative, corporate-approved candidates,
Click to expand...

As discussed before and highlighted, this is 100% false. The DNC released a list of polling sources they would use. All of them came from major media outlets, and threw in Quinnipiac, Monmouth, Des Moines Register, and University of New Hampshire. These polling sources were agreed upon in February of 2019. For the September debate, the DNC dropped the Las Vegas Review and Reuters as polling sources, and this was announced in May of 2019.

she says she's considering a boycott of Tuesday's sham debate, or what she calls "reality show television."
Click to expand...

If she does, then she's making a huge mistake.

If the Democrats and their corporate cronies in the MSM are serious about winning in 2020 and opposing what they claim is the unwholesome corruption of Donald Trump, why aren't they supporting the only current candidate who can beat him?
Click to expand...

The DNC has every right to determine who goes onto the stage. It's their debates, their choice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom