• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Whistle Blower Worked Directly With Joe Biden, The Scam Is Falling Apart

JasperL said:
The problem is a career CIA person working in the WH under Obama means....nothing about whether he's a "democrat" activist. He definitely worked in the WH under Trump, so he's really a Trump activist, right? If working "under" a President means that, then it means exactly that and when Trump took over and this guy accepted a job in the WH he therefore became a Trump activist. That's your premise, accept it or not.

And there is no evidence he met with Schiff. There is evidence he asked a staffer for HPSCI for advice on how to file a WB complaint intended for the HPSCI. How is that improper? There's no evidence any staffer helped him draft the complaint, or saw it before it was released.

At this point this is all irrelevant. The WB complaint WAS FILED. We know what is in it, we know the transcript, and who this person is simply doesn't matter because we are not relying on his statements for anything. What will matter for any impeachment inquiry is which of his statements are backed up by the evidence.

Put another way, let's say a drug dealer comes to the police with a report that his neighbor killed his wife and buried her in the back yard. If the police come out, the wife is gone, there's a human sized hole in the backyard, what difference does the identity or history of the snitch make? That hole contains a body or it does not, and how the police find out about it simply is irrelevant after the investigation into the murder starts. What you're doing is screaming "THE SNITCH IS A KNOWN DRUG DEALER!!!!@!" and it just doesn't matter.
Click to expand...

It shows that the cultists are more than willing to continue to repeat conspiracy theories and lies over and over. Reality is not a big thing with them these days.
 
CaughtInThe said:
What you really sound like is Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.

Two men who lie constantly and omit facts to push an agenda.

I guess you should be proud of doing that impersonation.
Click to expand...

I know right, Asking for the House to vote on real evidence to get a conciseness if what is being said has any validity, making such evidence public, and asking they got through the adapted procedure of an Impeachment Inquiry vote is so wrong to think voters are entitled to anything other then what Pelosi tells them.

Now the WB's lawyers don't want the WB to testify and will only allow him to testify in writing so he doesn't have any questions asked of him is so forth coming.

What was I thinking.
 
VanceMack said:
I dont know whats worse...that the rat party knows they can reliably count on the idiot leftists to fall for this **** or that the idiot leftists continuously fall for this ****.
Click to expand...

The two are in a 'hold my beer' competition, spiraling ever further downward, feeding on each other, instigating each other to go even lower, and those challenges seem to be always accepted and exceeded.
 
Condor060 said:
How does this look for Pig Face Pelosi now? :lamo
Click to expand...

I don't know. You and DonDon are looking up from under her butt. So you tell us. Hang on to your fantasies about the WB. We are way past the WB now. You boys just can't keep up with how quickly this is falling apart for Donald Vladimir Trumpkin. You boys are still yanking meat in your little circle jerks about the WB and that is about 6 news cycles ago at best....more like 12.
 
Last edited:
jnug said:
I don't know. You and DonDon are looking up from under her butt. So you tell us. Hang on to your fantasies about the WB. We are way past the WB now. You boys just can't keep up with how quickly this is falling apart for Donald Vladimir Trumpkin. You boys are still yanking meat in your little circle jerks about the WB and that is about 6 news cycles ago at best....more like 12.
Click to expand...

Same ole same ole blah blah blah
 
JasperL said:
The problem is a career CIA person working in the WH under Obama means....nothing about whether he's a "democrat" activist. He definitely worked in the WH under Trump, so he's really a Trump activist, right? If working "under" a President means that, then it means exactly that and when Trump took over and this guy accepted a job in the WH he therefore became a Trump activist. That's your premise, accept it or not.
Click to expand...

Clapper, Brennan, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, and dozens of other biased Hillary-loving, Trump-hating government officials have proven they were willing to break laws and lie in their combined efforts to overthrow the results of the 2016 election. This whistleblower shows similar signs and has even been described by current government officials as a former employee of one of Trump's opponents in the 2020 election, with a distinctive democrat bias. You provide no proof to the contrary.

And there is no evidence he met with Schiff.
Click to expand...

Correction: You have not seen the evidence. That does not mean it is not there. Furthermore, several republican congressmen stated in a press briefing that evidence shows the whistleblower met with Schitff before he even filed his bogus complaint. You offer no evidence to the contrary.

There is evidence he asked a staffer for HPSCI for advice on how to file a WB complaint intended for the HPSCI. How is that improper? There's no evidence any staffer helped him draft the complaint, or saw it before it was released.
Click to expand...

You have not even been looking into this issue personally. You don't know who the whistleblower talked to or what help or motivation he may have received from others. You demonstrate that you wish to support a narrative you like but cannot prove.

At this point this is all irrelevant. The WB complaint WAS FILED. We know what is in it, we know the transcript, and who this person is simply doesn't matter because we are not relying on his statements for anything. What will matter for any impeachment inquiry is which of his statements are backed up by the evidence.
Click to expand...

We have two stories. The whistleblower's and his supporters' opinionated takes on 3rd hand information and Trump's and his lawyer's account. We don't know who this gripe-faced whistleblower is or why he may think we should adopt his views, but we do have the transcript which shows us the whistleblower got several facts wrong and therefore is not to be given credence.

Put another way, let's say a drug dealer comes to the police with a report that his neighbor killed his wife and buried her in the back yard. If the police come out, the wife is gone, there's a human sized hole in the backyard, what difference does the identity or history of the snitch make? That hole contains a body or it does not, and how the police find out about it simply is irrelevant after the investigation into the murder starts. What you're doing is screaming "THE SNITCH IS A KNOWN DRUG DEALER!!!!@!" and it just doesn't matter.
Click to expand...

If some dummass lying political activist comes along and claims he heard that Trump pressured the President of Ukraine to dig up dirt on Biden, we don't just rush out and hang the President of the US on the basis of his one strange anonymous claim that came from outside the inner circle of those who actually heard and understood the actual phone call in question. Democrats may do something that stupid but only because they commonly do stupid things in desperate efforts to deceive voters into rejecting Trump for one of their lying dummass leftist socialist candidates.
 
marke said:
Clapper, Brennan, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, and dozens of other biased Hillary-loving, Trump-hating government officials have proven they were willing to break laws and lie in their combined efforts to overthrow the results of the 2016 election. This whistleblower shows similar signs and has even been described by current government officials as a former employee of one of Trump's opponents in the 2020 election, with a distinctive democrat bias. You provide no proof to the contrary.



Correction: You have not seen the evidence. That does not mean it is not there. Furthermore, several republican congressmen stated in a press briefing that evidence shows the whistleblower met with Schitff before he even filed his bogus complaint. You offer no evidence to the contrary.



You have not even been looking into this issue personally. You don't know who the whistleblower talked to or what help or motivation he may have received from others. You demonstrate that you wish to support a narrative you like but cannot prove.



We have two stories. The whistleblower's and his supporters' opinionated takes on 3rd hand information and Trump's and his lawyer's account. We don't know who this gripe-faced whistleblower is or why he may think we should adopt his views, but we do have the transcript which shows us the whistleblower got several facts wrong and therefore is not to be given credence.



If some dummass lying political activist comes along and claims he heard that Trump pressured the President of Ukraine to dig up dirt on Biden, we don't just rush out and hang the President of the US on the basis of his one strange anonymous claim that came from outside the inner circle of those who actually heard and understood the actual phone call in question. Democrats may do something that stupid but only because they commonly do stupid things in desperate efforts to deceive voters into rejecting Trump for one of their lying dummass leftist socialist candidates.
Click to expand...

How delciously delusional.

Literally not one thing you just posted is based in reality.
 
eohrnberger said:
It'd be a different thing if the leftists, Democrats, media lap dogs actually came with a story that wasn't contradicted with factual accounts, but they can't seem to manage to be able to produce that, and all we are left with is a string of hoaxes, one after the other, each more desperate than the the one before it, hopes that it'd damage Trump and undo the 2016 election results they didn't like, and don't accept to this very day, never mind what damage to the nations' institutions; never mind what hoaxes, rumors, gossip and innuendo; never mind the rule of law; never mine the constitution; never mind the large number of voters they'd disenfranchise if they were successful; never mind a lot of things, just as long as they get what they want, i.e. the political power they so crave.

What was the definition of tyranny, duplicity, hypocrisy again?

Seems to aptly apply, if you ask me.
Click to expand...

Democrat, duplicitous; tomato, tomato.
 
Another really cool thing about the Trump era is that it caused the rubes to talk more (and show us all how really stupid they are).
 
eohrnberger said:
The whole latest whistle blower was a scam, a hoax, a setup, a frame up, from the word go.
Same as the Russian Collusion hoax.
Same as the obstruction hoax.
Same as the Cohen hoax.

Every time the Democrats try to pull a hoax to attack Trump for the hate in their hearts they end up degrading the trust in federal institutions and themselves.

The Democrats are a clear and present danger to the nation, its institutions, its rule of law, and to the electorate. Such should not be elected high political office, ever.
Even if it brings an unconventional president such as Trump.
Click to expand...
Since we know that most all of what the democrats have claimed since Trump was elected was not so, why should we believe anything they claim from here on? Collusion was their sure fire crime and it fell apart, then obstruction and nothing. Then they tried campaign finance and nothing, now its whistleblower who the dems don't want to have to actually testify from some reason. Yeah, sure we believe Schifty Schiff and the crooked democrats and the Obama DOJ and FBI whom some have been fired and are under criminal referral by the IG. WE should believe these folks.
 
Integrityrespec said:
Since we know that most all of what the democrats have claimed since Trump was elected was not so, why should we believe anything they claim from here on? Collusion was their sure fire crime and it fell apart, then obstruction and nothing. Then they tried campaign finance and nothing, now its whistleblower who the dems don't want to have to actually testify from some reason. Yeah, sure we believe Schifty Schiff and the crooked democrats and the Obama DOJ and FBI whom some have been fired and are under criminal referral by the IG. WE should believe these folks.
Click to expand...

No reason that I can think of to believe anything the Democrats are throw up against the wall to see if it sticks.

Given their recent track record, I think it fair to start from the assumption that it's a hoax, until and unless proven otherwise.
 
No one expects you to believe anything, they expect you to lose and you will.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Another democrat put up hoax and lie goes all to hell on them.
 
SonOfDaedalus said:
What's wrong with you people? The whistleblowers are irrelevant. We have text messages, testimony, and a transcript. More testimony to come.

The whistleblower could have been Hillary Clinton herself and it wouldn't matter. The evidence is the evidence.
Click to expand...

They don't care about facts, just character assassination.
 
Integrityrespec said:
Since we know that most all of what the democrats have claimed since Trump was elected was not so, why should we believe anything they claim from here on? Collusion was their sure fire crime and it fell apart, then obstruction and nothing. Then they tried campaign finance and nothing, now its whistleblower who the dems don't want to have to actually testify from some reason. Yeah, sure we believe Schifty Schiff and the crooked democrats and the Obama DOJ and FBI whom some have been fired and are under criminal referral by the IG. WE should believe these folks.
Click to expand...
I don’t know about the Dems, but for certain you shouldn’t be believed. Your post is full of bull****.
 
Integrityrespec said:
Since we know that most all of what the democrats have claimed since Trump was elected was not so, why should we believe anything they claim from here on? Collusion was their sure fire crime and it fell apart, then obstruction and nothing. Then they tried campaign finance and nothing, now its whistleblower who the dems don't want to have to actually testify from some reason. Yeah, sure we believe Schifty Schiff and the crooked democrats and the Obama DOJ and FBI whom some have been fired and are under criminal referral by the IG. WE should believe these folks.
Click to expand...

A broken clock is right twice a day!!!

:donkeyfla
 
Integrityrespec said:
Since we know that most all of what the democrats have claimed since Trump was elected was not so, why should we believe anything they claim from here on? Collusion was their sure fire crime and it fell apart, then obstruction and nothing. Then they tried campaign finance and nothing, now its whistleblower who the dems don't want to have to actually testify from some reason. Yeah, sure we believe Schifty Schiff and the crooked democrats and the Obama DOJ and FBI whom some have been fired and are under criminal referral by the IG. WE should believe these folks.
Click to expand...

At this point, after all the depositions so far, there is absolutely no need whatsoever for the whistleblower to testify. Every single career foreign public servant has given depositions that validate and verify the whistleblower's 911 alarm. This isn't about the deposition of one single whistleblower anymore.
 
3leftsdoo said:
Would LOVE to see this traitorous, $elf-$erving spy in prison.

:thumbs:
Click to expand...

So this person (if they even exist) may have actual information of criminal activity during the Barack Hussein Obama administration.

Take care of him better than they did Epstein.

Media, deep state, intel operatives, and democrats are scrambling for their lives.. Watch out!

brennan.JPG
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom