• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Whistle Blower Worked Directly With Joe Biden, The Scam Is Falling Apart

Condor060 said:
Riiiiiight. Oooooooookaaayyy.

We already found out the WB lied about his contact who was supposedly a WH official that he said gave him the information about the call only the official testified he was not on the call.

We already found out that the WB claimed Rudy was pushing Volker to help with the investigation when it was Volker who was asked Rudy

Now we find out this partisan hack was actually working for Biden? What a fraud.
Click to expand...

He was working for the United States. We don't have a monarchy here, and he wasn't part of Biden's staff. He's career CIA. We used to respect those people, but now if they're not solidly Trump cultists, sycophants and other ass kissers, they are the enemy.
 
JasperL said:
For complying with the law about how to file a WB complaint, and about whom the IC IG and DNI say nothing negative?

Is it your belief that opposing Dear Leader is a criminal offense? Are we a monarchy now and Trump is your King? Do you have a picture of him so you can kiss an image of his fat rear end as you post garbage like this?

All reasonable questions I think.
Click to expand...

:roll:
 
JasperL said:
He was working for the United States. We don't have a monarchy here, and he wasn't part of Biden's staff. He's career CIA. We used to respect those people, but now if they're not solidly Trump cultists, sycophants and other ass kissers, they are the enemy.
Click to expand...

The Democrats really, really, REALLY love the Deep State.

:thumbs:
 
Gimmesometruth said:
View attachment 67265966

52 USC 30121: Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or


(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.
Click to expand...

No quid pro quo in this conversation, per the public transcript.

Sondland responds: "Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump's intentions. The President has been crystal clear no quid pro quo's of any kind."
Texts Detail Top Diplomat's Concerns About Possible Trump-Ukraine Quid Pro Quo : NPR
Click to expand...

By direction of the president "no quid pro quo's of any kind".

Tucker Carlson Uncovers Election-year Request From Bill ...
Conservative news, politics, opinion, breaking news analysis, political cartoons and commentary – Townhall › tipsheet › leahbarkoukis › 2019/10/08 › tucker-carl...
3 days ago - Tucker Carlson Uncovers Election-year Request From Bill Clinton to Tony Blair ... to find evidence of former President Bill Clinton asking then-U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair for a political favor…during an election year. “You've ...
​

Favors between heads of state don't seem to be out of the ordinary. Must be the circles they 'run' in.

No investigation was started because of that telephone conversation, it was already re-opened on the Ukrainian's own accord well before that phone call.

Document reveals Ukraine had already reopened probe of ...
Fox News - Breaking News Updates | Latest News Headlines | Photos & News Videos › media › john-solomon-says-new-hunter-biden-r...
2 days ago - "The U.S. government had open-source intelligence and was aware as early as February of 2019 that the Ukrainian government was planning to reopen ... Solomon: Investigation into Hunter Biden's Ukraine company began ...

Meet the Ukrainian Ex-Prosecutor Behind the Impeachment ...
https://www.nytimes.com › world › europe › ukraine-prosecutor-trump
5 days ago - On Tuesday, Ukrainian authorities announced that they had opened a .... torpedoed a secret 2017 investigation by the anti-corruption bureau, ...
​

How can you have a quid pro quo for an investigation that was already reopened on the Ukrainian's own accord before the phone call?

No pressure, at least not that the president of the Ukraine felt.

Ukraine president says there was no 'blackmail' in Trump ...
https://www.latimes.com › story › ukraine-zelensky-trump-impeachment
4 hours ago - Volodymyr Zelensky insists he faced "no blackmail" from President Trump ... The Ukrainian president said Thursday that there was no pressure ...
​

How can you have a quid pro quo without some sort of 'pressure' or arm twisting being applied?

Ukraine didn't know Trump had canceled military aid during ...
https://nypost.com › 2019/10/02 › ukraine-didnt-know-trump-had-cancele...
Oct 2, 2019 - Ukraine didn't know Trump had canceled military aid during July ... pro quo over the funds, then tried to cover up details of the conversation.
​

How can you have a quid pro quo when the party receiving the 'quo' didn't even know it was being held?

What is being accused by the Democrats is simply not held up by these facts, in fact, the narrative they are putting forth it is completely obliterated by these facts.

:shrug:

Given the demonstrated and documented coordination and orchestration between the whistle blower and Piece of Schiff's office, which Piece of Schiff covered up and lied about, puts the meter tilt far into a political setup and frame up; yet another hoax coordination and orchestration by the Democrats to take down a legitimately elected president.

Seems hard to conclude other than yet another hoax by the Democrats, which has, yet again, degraded the electorate's trust federal government institutions such as congress, the DOJ, the FBI, the CIA, and the rule of law.
 
Condor060 said:
You mean the won that owns the Senate and the WH. It was on TV, did you miss it?

You used to own the house, what happened? The senate was not in play and the president wasn’t up for re-election.

But I digress, the stuff coming will render this conversation moot.
You should check the news, lot of stuff going down and it’s all bad.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
 
Bandit said:
Sure, hell, convict him for it if you can, trump is still guilty and nothing will change that.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

'Trump is guilty because, believe me'. :lamo :lamo

That's called presumed guilt, which is a favorite pastime of the leftists, dictators, tyrants, and Democrats (but I needlessly repeat myself), and is not a foundation of the US legal system, which has been, and will continue to be (unless the leftists, dictators, tyrants, and Democrats change it), what you can prove. So far, the leftists and Democrats (but I needlessly repeat myself) haven't proven their case.

Is requiring the leftists, dictators, tyrants, and Democrats (but I needlessly repeat myself) to actually prove their case simply too much to ask?

:shrug:
 
3leftsdoo said:
:roll:
Click to expand...

You said, "Would LOVE to see this traitorous, $elf-$erving spy in prison."

Sure, you roll your eyes, but if you're not posting idiocy like that to kiss Trump's fat ass, why are you doing it? You can't believe it, right? I mean surely not, cause that is really, really dumb. Would imply that filing a complaint as the law requires, including protecting classified information, through the legally mandated channels is still a criminal offense and he's a traitor BECAUSE HE CRITICIZED THE KING TRUMP.

So forgive me if I'm having trouble understanding... Doesn't make sense to me.
 
eohrnberger said:
No quid pro quo in this conversation, per the public transcript.



By direction of the president "no quid pro quo's of any kind".

Tucker Carlson Uncovers Election-year Request From Bill ...
Conservative news, politics, opinion, breaking news analysis, political cartoons and commentary – Townhall › tipsheet › leahbarkoukis › 2019/10/08 › tucker-carl...
3 days ago - Tucker Carlson Uncovers Election-year Request From Bill Clinton to Tony Blair ... to find evidence of former President Bill Clinton asking then-U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair for a political favor…during an election year. “You've ...
​

Favors between heads of state don't seem to be out of the ordinary. Must be the circles they 'run' in.

No investigation was started because of that telephone conversation, it was already re-opened on the Ukrainian's own accord well before that phone call.

Document reveals Ukraine had already reopened probe of ...
Fox News - Breaking News Updates | Latest News Headlines | Photos & News Videos › media › john-solomon-says-new-hunter-biden-r...
2 days ago - "The U.S. government had open-source intelligence and was aware as early as February of 2019 that the Ukrainian government was planning to reopen ... Solomon: Investigation into Hunter Biden's Ukraine company began ...

Meet the Ukrainian Ex-Prosecutor Behind the Impeachment ...
https://www.nytimes.com › world › europe › ukraine-prosecutor-trump
5 days ago - On Tuesday, Ukrainian authorities announced that they had opened a .... torpedoed a secret 2017 investigation by the anti-corruption bureau, ...
​

How can you have a quid pro quo for an investigation that was already reopened on the Ukrainian's own accord before the phone call?

No pressure, at least not that the president of the Ukraine felt.

Ukraine president says there was no 'blackmail' in Trump ...
https://www.latimes.com › story › ukraine-zelensky-trump-impeachment
4 hours ago - Volodymyr Zelensky insists he faced "no blackmail" from President Trump ... The Ukrainian president said Thursday that there was no pressure ...
​

How can you have a quid pro quo without some sort of 'pressure' or arm twisting being applied?

Ukraine didn't know Trump had canceled military aid during ...
https://nypost.com › 2019/10/02 › ukraine-didnt-know-trump-had-cancele...
Oct 2, 2019 - Ukraine didn't know Trump had canceled military aid during July ... pro quo over the funds, then tried to cover up details of the conversation.
​

How can you have a quid pro quo when the party receiving the 'quo' didn't even know it was being held?

What is being accused by the Democrats is simply not held up by these facts, in fact, the narrative they are putting forth it is completely obliterated by these facts.

:shrug:

Given the demonstrated and documented coordination and orchestration between the whistle blower and Piece of Schiff's office, which Piece of Schiff covered up and lied about, puts the meter tilt far into a political setup and frame up; yet another hoax coordination and orchestration by the Democrats to take down a legitimately elected president.

Seems hard to conclude other than yet another hoax by the Democrats, which has, yet again, degraded the electorate's trust federal government institutions such as congress, the DOJ, the FBI, the CIA, and the rule of law.
Click to expand...

Why do you think posting a large number of words with no meaning will make a difference?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
eohrnberger said:
'Trump is guilty because, believe me'. :lamo :lamo

That's called presumed guilt, which is a favorite pastime of the leftists, dictators, tyrants, and Democrats (but I needlessly repeat myself), and is not a foundation of the US legal system, which has been, and will continue to be (unless the leftists, dictators, tyrants, and Democrats change it), what you can prove. So far, the leftists and Democrats (but I needlessly repeat myself) haven't proven their case.

Is requiring the leftists, dictators, tyrants, and Democrats (but I needlessly repeat myself) to actually prove their case simply too much to ask?

:shrug:
Click to expand...

Nah, it’s called ‘in plain site’. Keep trying.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
eohrnberger said:
'Trump is guilty because, believe me'. :lamo :lamo

That's called presumed guilt, which is a favorite pastime of the leftists, dictators, tyrants, and Democrats (but I needlessly repeat myself), and is not a foundation of the US legal system, which has been, and will continue to be (unless the leftists, dictators, tyrants, and Democrats change it), what you can prove. So far, the leftists and Democrats (but I needlessly repeat myself) haven't proven their case.

Is requiring the leftists, dictators, tyrants, and Democrats (but I needlessly repeat myself) to actually prove their case simply too much to ask?

:shrug:
Click to expand...

Trump is LITERALLY Hitler!!!!

Case closed!!!!

:donkeyfla:
 
JasperL said:
You said, "Would LOVE to see this traitorous, $elf-$erving spy in prison."

Sure, you roll your eyes, but if you're not posting idiocy like that to kiss Trump's fat ass, why are you doing it? You can't believe it, right? I mean surely not, cause that is really, really dumb. Would imply that filing a complaint as the law requires, including protecting classified information, through the legally mandated channels is still a criminal offense and he's a traitor BECAUSE HE CRITICIZED THE KING TRUMP.

So forgive me if I'm having trouble understanding... Doesn't make sense to me.
Click to expand...

I believe that you're having trouble understanding. :)
 
Bandit said:
Why do you think posting a large number of words with no meaning will make a difference?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Too many words for you?
Too much logic and facts for you?

:shrug:
 
3leftsdoo said:
Trump is LITERALLY Hitler!!!!

Case closed!!!!

:donkeyfla:
Click to expand...

It's about as much logic and critical thinking as it typically applied by the left, yeah, I'll agree with you there.
 
Cultists 'proof'.

A retired CIA officer told the Washington Examiner... (Anonymous source, thought they dismissed anonymous sources)

...probable that the whistleblower briefed Biden and likely... (doesn't know for sure, guessing)

... former Trump administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity...(Again anonymous source)

...may feel defensive towards him...(again doesn't know, guessing)

“Maybe it is innocent, maybe not.”(Hasn't a clue if anything happen)

What the cultists ignore.

"First, our client has never worked for or advised a political candidate, campaign, or party," said Andrew Bakaj and Mark Zaid. "Second, our client has spent their entire government career in apolitical, civil servant positions in the Executive Branch." (Named sources that actually know who the WB is, denies the innuendos)

Glenn Carle, a former CIA officer who himself blew the whistle on George W. Bush administration efforts to collect intelligence on an American citizen, said the distinction was crucial. “The truth is that the whistleblower would have worked with Biden not in some partisan political sense but as a member of the government,” he said. “It is scurrilous to suppose there was a political motivation.” (Named CIA officer explaining how the CIA really works)

Cultists aren't the shapest crayons in the box. :rofl
 
3leftsdoo said:
All sizzle, no burger.
Click to expand...

It'd be a different thing if the leftists, Democrats, media lap dogs actually came with a story that wasn't contradicted with factual accounts, but they can't seem to manage to be able to produce that, and all we are left with is a string of hoaxes, one after the other, each more desperate than the the one before it, hopes that it'd damage Trump and undo the 2016 election results they didn't like, and don't accept to this very day, never mind what damage to the nations' institutions; never mind what hoaxes, rumors, gossip and innuendo; never mind the rule of law; never mine the constitution; never mind the large number of voters they'd disenfranchise if they were successful; never mind a lot of things, just as long as they get what they want, i.e. the political power they so crave.

What was the definition of tyranny, duplicity, hypocrisy again?

Seems to aptly apply, if you ask me.
 
eohrnberger said:
No quid pro quo in this conversation, per the public transcript.
.
Click to expand...
thats the beauty of solicitation, it doesnt require it, the mere asking for this thing of value violates this law.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
it is funny to see the daily mail sourcing the Washington Examiner, but not as funny as B. York assuming he or the WH knows who the WB is.

But again, it is all character assassination, shooting the messenger...the WH already confirmed the crime.
Click to expand...

There was no crime except for what democrats have committed in creating this fake whistleblower lying complaint.
Adam Schitff can hide the facts which are coming out by trying to keep testimony of witnesses secret, but it will be coming out in the end anyway so the partisan hack will once again be proven to be nothing but a despicable liar in his efforts to take Trump down for the corrupt benefit of the democrat party.
 
Condor060 said:
Riiiiiight. Oooooooookaaayyy.

We already found out the WB lied about his contact who was supposedly a WH official that he said gave him the information about the call only the official testified he was not on the call.

We already found out that the WB claimed Rudy was pushing Volker to help with the investigation when it was Volker who was asked Rudy

Now we find out this partisan hack was actually working for Biden? What a fraud.
Click to expand...

Do keep up the mantra. I mean, like Daily caller and town hall is so reliable. We have seen how often stuff they put out have fallen to pieces.
 
RAMOSS said:
Do keep up the mantra. I mean, like Daily caller and town hall is so reliable. We have seen how often stuff they put out have fallen to pieces.
Click to expand...

Uh huh, I guess the CIA who exposed this are just lying.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
thats the beauty of solicitation, it doesnt require it, the mere asking for this thing of value violates this law.
Click to expand...

Meh. Inquiring about corruption, not even mentioning re-opening investigations, which had already been re-opened on their own accord, makes this a request of value? Really?

Funny, don't recall the same level of outrage when:

1.British intelligence passed Trump associates' talks ... - CNN.com
[url]https://www.cnn.com › 2017/04/13 › politics › trump-russia-british-intellige...[/URL]
Apr 14, 2017 - Washington (CNN) British and other European intelligence agencies intercepted communications between associates of Donald Trump and ...

2.Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire – POLITICO
[url]https://www.politico.com › story › ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446[/URL]
Jan 11, 2017 - Donald Trump wasn't the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country. Ukrainian ...

3.Australian diplomat whose tip prompted FBI's Russia-probe ...
[url]https://thehill.com › 376858-australian-diplomat-whose-tip-prompted-fbis-...[/URL]
Mar 5, 2018 - The Australian diplomat whose tip in 2016 prompted the Russia-Trump investigation previously arranged one of the largest foreign donations to Bill and Hillary Clinton’s charitable efforts, documents show. ... Australia was one of four foreign governments to donate more than $25 ...
​

Which, in my estimation, are all far worse, more severe offenses.

It'd be far more believable if the outrage didn't follow party lines so precisely.

As it is, the leftist extremists and Democrat's (although I needlessly repeat myself) narrative is already thoroughly debunked, collapsed and exploded in their faces, yet again.

Hoax after hoax. It seems this is all the leftist extremists and Democrat's (although I needlessly repeat myself) seem to be able to muster. :shrug:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom