3leftsdoo
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2019
- Messages
- 18,105
- Reaction score
- 5,175
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Lol, trump isn’t John F. Kennedy.
In fairness, even the Clintons aren't as sleazy as the Kennedys...
Lol, trump isn’t John F. Kennedy.
Hell yeah. I'd personally be happy with jailing anyone who dares criticize Trump, but no doubt the whiny liberals would complain. Trump needs to declare elections illegal until the swamp is drained; no point refilling the swamp after just 8 years.
I'm glad Trump asked Ukraine to interfere in the election. Democrats must be prevented from gaining power under any circumstances, even if that means no more elections. It's the safest way.
It says so much about Democrats that they only care about power. Absolute power. They are willing to destroy the country to do it. And that's fine with them, because they want it rebuilt in their own image.
Deep state unnamed leaker or a patriot?
I'll let you decide.
Discuss.
Exclusive: Official Who Heard Call Says Trump Got 'Rolled' By Turkey and 'Has No Spine'
I don't remember the above ever happening to any president, the deliberate leaking meant to undermine the president of the U.S.
What about the precedence all this partisan leaking is setting for the republic, no matter who sits in the WH? Are people this desperate to have their team take over?
I fear some are so invested in their witch hunt type politics, (whomever this unnamed NSC source is), that they are not giving any forethought to the harm they are doing to the republic. The fact that they don't even care is dangerous.
We are living in scary times.
Deep state leaker or a patriot?
Well, IMO it is just another example of a non-elected partisan trying to affect policy by leaking information in violation of oaths and ethics. In this case it appears to be just slanderous opinion
These individuals are supposed to do their jobs. If the job is to advise the President, then offer counsel that differs to insure it is something considered before a President makes a decision. But the final decision should be the President's at which point either buck up and support him/her, or resign.
But this constant effort to undermine the Chief Executive simply because they think they know better has troubled me for years. The examples being set since 2016 are going to poison all future administrations.
Consider the possibility of an Administration YOU support, and then having a number of civil servants who oppose your candidate "leaking" information, asserting slanderous claims, doing everything possible to make that Administration fail from within. Don't think this example is going to stop here.
People who serve the system need to buck-up and do the job they were hired to do. Raise reasonable objection, but then when given your marching orders, do your job. If you can't then go look for another job. Let the President find someone who will work to support their policies.
Feel free to vote the President out at the end of four years.
Imagine a president who had absolute power, someone like trump, to do anything they wish with no repercussions, nobody to blow the whistle, nobody to send up a flare, nobody to raise any red flags. Imagine where we would be right now if trump had that power. He doesn't and look at where we are now.
Sure there is potential danger with leakers but the danger would be even more severe with a leader with unlimited power.
False Equivalency.
President's do not have "absolute power." There is no need to "imagine" something so as to set up a straw man argument like you propose.
No American government servant is required to obey illegal orders. There are all sorts of established checks and balances, as well as legal recourses if such occurs.
Your constant attempts to compare Trump to a dictator are rejected. :coffeepap:
False Equivalency.
President's do not have "absolute power." There is no need to "imagine" something so as to set up a straw man argument like you propose.
No American government servant is required to obey illegal orders. There are all sorts of established checks and balances, as well as legal recourses if such occurs.
The story in the OP does not even fall into any such category. It is merely a slanderous attack, voicing a "negative opinion" about how they "felt" a conversation went.
Your constant attempts to compare Trump to a dictator are rejected. :coffeepap:
And why do you suppose our president wants to confront his whistle-blower face to face?
Deep state unnamed leaker or a patriot?
I'll let you decide.
Discuss.
Exclusive: Official Who Heard Call Says Trump Got 'Rolled' By Turkey and 'Has No Spine'
You must have seen this video:
Neither.
A traitorous spy and self-serving insect.
The Democratic party really need to be outlawed at this point. Put Pelosi and the rest of them in jail, and execute the whistleblowers.
Trump needs to stay in power until the swamp is drained, whether that takes 10 or 20 years.
Can the answer be both?
At what point do Trump defenders feel stupid?
It's not Trump.. it's:
- a deep state "leaker" -
- a partisan whistle-blower
- a second partisan whistle-blower
- Schiff, Nancy, Nadler all out to get him
- Republican Rosenstein out ot get him
- Republican Comey out to get him
- Republican Mueller out to get him
- Cohen his former personal fixer for 10 years, was the bad guy
- FBI is all corrupted when it comes to Trump
- U.S. Intelligence got it all wrong, Trump/Russia know best
- The 80% of all U.S. news media is all wrong, only the faithful 20% (entertainers like Hannity, Rush, etc.) are right
- Our U.S. diplomats are wrong, Trump is right
- Former navy seals..wrong, Trump is rigt.
- **** the gold start families, Trump is right.
- FEC is wrong, Trump is right
- Courts are wrong when against Trump
- Senate is wrong (on Russian sanctions), Trump is right
vs
The problem is Trump.
It's like everyone in the universe has to be deemed wrong, any time they oppose Trump. At what point do his supporters feel stupid.
It's Trump.
He’s a part of an organized effort to finally “get” Trump. The two whistleblowers are a team. One is used to generate talk about the other, so what you have is a feedback loop designed for the media to feed on, yet in reality there is no new information just one boosting the other.
That is why I think the intelligence agencies are involved.
The People will only stand for so much.
Oh heck yeah! Democrats and Republicans have been meddling in elections all over the world since forever. Now the Democrats clutch their pearls because some WB gets the vapors over a phone call with Ukraine.
Oh, those are our only choices? :roll:Deep state unnamed leaker or a patriot?
At what point do Trump defenders feel stupid?
It's not Trump.. it's:
- a deep state "leaker" -
- a partisan whistle-blower
- a second partisan whistle-blower
- Schiff, Nancy, Nadler all out to get him
- Republican Rosenstein out ot get him
- Republican Comey out to get him
- Republican Mueller out to get him
- Cohen his former personal fixer for 10 years, was the bad guy
- FBI is all corrupted when it comes to Trump
- U.S. Intelligence got it all wrong, Trump/Russia know best
- The 80% of all U.S. news media is all wrong, only the faithful 20% (entertainers like Hannity, Rush, etc.) are right
- Our U.S. diplomats are wrong, Trump is right
- Former navy seals..wrong, Trump is rigt.
- **** the gold start families, Trump is right.
- FEC is wrong, Trump is right
- Courts are wrong when against Trump
- Senate is wrong (on Russian sanctions), Trump is right
vs
The problem is Trump.
It's like everyone in the universe has to be deemed wrong, any time they oppose Trump. At what point do his supporters feel stupid.
It's Trump.