• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump's actions prove that the Russia investigation was justified

SonOfDaedalus

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 13, 2017
Messages
13,568
Reaction score
8,485
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
Now that Trump has openly asked China to investigate Biden and there is evidence that he asked Ukraine to do the same, he has justified the Russia investigation.

Critics of the investigation claimed it was a witchhunt. They claimed the allegations were absurd.

The allegation was that Trump colluded with a foreign government to influence the election.

Mueller (Mr. Magoo) couldn't find proof that Trump conspired with Russia to get Hillary Clinton's emails. But that doesn't mean he was innocent. It means they couldn't find proof. He got away with it.

But like most criminals, he couldn't help himself and did the same thing in Ukraine and now China.
 
Of course the Russia investigation was justified. Trump went on live TV and asked the Russians to get involved in our election and find dirt on his opponent. We have video of it but he and his supporters still try to pretend it's an unfounded conspiracy theory. Now he's doing it again and the same crowd is denying it even while he's saying it on live, international TV, again.

He does not value our Constitution or the integrity of our elections and repeatedly violates the law. He absolutely needs to be removed from office, either by impeachment or dragged out kicking and screaming by the voters.
 
Now that Trump has openly asked China to investigate Biden and there is evidence that he asked Ukraine to do the same, he has justified the Russia investigation.

Critics of the investigation claimed it was a witchhunt. They claimed the allegations were absurd.

The allegation was that Trump colluded with a foreign government to influence the election.

Mueller (Mr. Magoo) couldn't find proof that Trump conspired with Russia to get Hillary Clinton's emails. But that doesn't mean he was innocent. It means they couldn't find proof. He got away with it.

But like most criminals, he couldn't help himself and did the same thing in Ukraine and now China.

Another pro-criminal Democratic message furious at even the thought of investigating Democratic officials engaged in bribery and extortion for personal and political profit directly and thru family members.
 
He can't win without foreign help. Not in 2016, not in 2020. He knows it, we know it, everyone knows it.
 
Now that Trump has openly asked China to investigate Biden and there is evidence that he asked Ukraine to do the same, he has justified the Russia investigation.

Critics of the investigation claimed it was a witchhunt. They claimed the allegations were absurd.

The allegation was that Trump colluded with a foreign government to influence the election.

Mueller (Mr. Magoo) couldn't find proof that Trump conspired with Russia to get Hillary Clinton's emails. But that doesn't mean he was innocent. It means they couldn't find proof. He got away with it.

But like most criminals, he couldn't help himself and did the same thing in Ukraine and now China.

Well, well, well,. For some strange reason the allegations of any quid pro quo with Zelensky have vanished. That ship sailed when the transcript of Trump’s call with the Ukrainian leader offered no evidence that the president was offering military aid as a carrot, which was the initial allegation.

Now Democrats insist that no quid pro quo is needed to prove a high crime or misdemeanor occurred during the phone call. Instead, they insist, this is a question of an illegal campaign contribution. You mean to tell me the closest thing the Democrats can pin to the president is a vague campaign finance violation?

Their answer is that Joe Biden is running for president. Their entire argument for impeachment now rests on the idea that Biden’s candidacy makes him immune to any criminal activities or any investigation. Democrats are now trying to impeach the president on this basis, even without pointing to a specific law that would state a crime exist?

I told you this over a week ago and everything I told you has come to pass. I told you the quid pro quo would fall to the side as they will find something else to pin their hopes on. But you wouldn't listen then, and you won't listen now.

Just as I predicted, this is falling apart as fast as it started and when Democrats decide the power of the office of president is the same no matter who is in office, your life will be much easier instead of pinning your hopes on failed Impeachment attempts over and over and over.

PELOSI HYPOCRISY.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom