• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

WATCH: Warren Lied About Losing Public School Teaching Job Because She Was ‘Visibly Pregna

Oh Warren's telling stories alright...

And dehumanizing Trump is Democrat bread & butter, but that's not a problem, right?

:thumbs:

Dems are broken.....heart filled with hate and negativity.
 
Perhaps you don't know what a whattaboutism is. Comparing an entity's disparate reaction to similar events can, depending on circumstances, be a reason to doubt that entity's argument. Call it examination by bias if you must.

Your intent was clear.
"those who defend lying scum" This couldn't be Trump? Or could it? Post it/own it.
 
Then you both have something in common. :)

Naw - when I Fifty Shades of Grey somebody, I don't leave any scars.

:spank:
 
Great - you can leave him alone then. :thumbs:

Waaaa....leave Trump alone.....waaaa.

crocker2007.jpg



I'll leave him alone after he's kicked out of office.
 
Democrat lies = Embellishments

:donkeyfla:

a detail, especially one that is not true, added to a statement or story to make it more interesting or entertaining.

Perhaps you should use your search engine before posting so as to not appear to be ignorant. But that would be inconsistent!
 
"Our next president" seems to have a record of being economical with the truth.
 
Why do you ask? What do you think?

And perhaps a better question is why Warren lies.

She didn’t want to talk about being pushed out of her job due to being pregnant, but later in life she was able to open up about it. But you think that makes her a liar. This is like your little “plagiarism” claim that blew up in your face.
 
She didn’t want to talk about being pushed out of her job due to being pregnant, but later in life she was able to open up about it. But you think that makes her a liar. This is like your little “plagiarism” claim that blew up in your face.

If she is smart, this gives her an opportunity to do a "things women have to deal with in America & this is why I fight for equality" speech like Obama did on race that made him much more popular.
 
Last edited:
Waaaa....leave Trump alone.....waaaa.

crocker2007.jpg


I'll leave him alone after he's kicked out of office.

Liking because I was going to post that. :)

But he'll be out of office soon enough - January 2025. :thumbs:
 
a detail, especially one that is not true, added to a statement or story to make it more interesting or entertaining.

Perhaps you should use your search engine before posting so as to not appear to be ignorant. But that would be inconsistent!

I know what embellishment means.

It's the word Democrats use for Democrat lies.

:)
 
Since we'll be discussing this crap whether we like it or not, I might as well get ahead of it, citing Jennifer Taub:

"Classic victim blaming. Speaking out about something you are silent about before does not make it a lie. That’s like saying a person who was sexually harassed or raped who does not mention it and then brings it up years later is lying."



Elizabeth Warren Lied About Losing Teaching Job Because She Was 'Visibly Pregnant'

Interestingly enough, mediaite is a pretty hard left site, so I'm not sure what the writer's beef is. Either way, what we're seeing here is a very likely replay of 2016, where the media carried on the tradition of the fairness doctrine by reporting on one of Trump's scandals, and then looking "fair" by taking a much lesser thing by Clinton and making it appear to be a newsworthy scandal. This tactic is always devastatingly helpful to trump, because then no matter how awful he is, the public perception is that it's just another choice between two flawed people. That's a gigantic part of why Clinton lost in 2016 and it looks like we'll be seeing the same bull**** all the way up to November 2020.

Edit: ah, the writer, Tommy Christopher, appears to have a giant hate-erection for Elizabeth Warren. Was he in one of her classes, and did she flunk him or something?

Adam Best on Twitter: "Dante is right. All this dude does is use Mediate as a front for his Warren attacks. It’s clear he is trying to bring her down because he prefers someone else, guessing someone more moderate. At least have the guts to be an honest broker in your criticisms, offer transparency.… https://t.co/wj4EBHT1z5"



Lest you are a democrat, she does not have the character to be president. A dumb liar, getting caught, then repeating herself....amazing.
 
She didn’t want to talk about being pushed out of her job due to being pregnant, but later in life she was able to open up about it. But you think that makes her a liar. This is like your little “plagiarism” claim that blew up in your face.

:lamo

OMG!

You guys!

The stuff you make up!

:lamo
 
If she is smart, this gives her an opportunity to do a "things women have to deal with in America & this is why I fight for equality" speech like Obama did on race that made him much more popular.

Obama actually has some decency & made a clever speech to boot.

Warren is a total fraud.
 
Lest you are a democrat, she does not have the character to be president. A dumb liar, getting caught, then repeating herself....amazing.

^ ^ Racist against fabricators! :2mad:
 
Turns out she lied about "losing" her job at all, as the Riverdale Board of Education voted to extend her to a second-year contract, but accepted, "with regret," her resignation a couple of months later.

Riverdale Board of Education Meeting Minutes Involving Elizabeth Warren, 1970-1971 | American Politicians | United States Government

Board meeting April 1971, toward the end of her first year of teaching:

10-91ab4c9c78.jpg


Then, June 1971:

12-37c4318d47.jpg


Her daughter was born in September 1971.

So in April would make her 4 month pregnant she was granted an additional year of teaching 2 days a week as a speech pathologist. Then in June at around 6 months pregnant she resigned. Then in September her baby was born. That coincides with what she said in that interview Harry Kreisler. Then she did nothing for 2 years and then applied for law school. Now she is saying that the principle fired her cause he found out she was visibly pregnant. Seems like she is lying to me.
 
I know what embellishment means.

It's the word Democrats use for Democrat lies.

:)

Or it's a word used by people with a vocabulary larger than that of a 3rd grader.
 
Or it's a word used by people with a vocabulary larger than that of a 3rd grader.

A big vocab w/big words is totes hot. :thumbs:

But I wonder what Dizzy Lizzie's next whopper will be?

Held prisoner at the Desert Inn as Howard Hughes' personal sex slave??? :eek:

Even though that would be a lie, it's okay when Dizzy Liz tells it because after all, bad things DO happen to people, and really, that would be her point!

:donkeyfla:
 
A big vocab w/big words is totes hot. :thumbs:

But I wonder what Dizzy Lizzie's next whopper will be?

Held prisoner at the Desert Inn as Howard Hughes' personal sex slave??? :eek:

Even though that would be a lie, it's okay when Dizzy Liz tells it because after all, bad things DO happen to people, and really, that would be her point!

:donkeyfla:

LOL

Well said.

So with their front runner proving what rational people have known all along, that being she's unelectable, it explains why the powers that control the New Democratic Party have launched this Ukraine scam.
 
She didn’t want to talk about being pushed out of her job due to being pregnant, but later in life she was able to open up about it. But you think that makes her a liar. This is like your little “plagiarism” claim that blew up in your face.

Poor Warren didn't want to talk about being pushed out of her job then but now is heroically able to? Alrighty then. Never mind that what she said then and what she claims now are on tape for you to hear and see for yourself. :roll:
 
Poor Warren didn't want to talk about being pushed out of her job then but now is heroically able to? Alrighty then. Never mind that what she said then and what she claims now are on tape for you to hear and see for yourself. :roll:

Never mind what records are showing- that she wasn't fired, but resigned. Never mind she was granted part-time teaching for a second year. She's a victim, dammit!
 
Back
Top Bottom