• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

So the Dems are going to impeach Trump

I feel like Trump "supporters" who are only here to post propaganda aren't even trying anymore...

When are the House Democrats going to vote on the impeachment inquiry ? We were told this was the worst scandal of Trump's Presidency, that there was a quid pro quo, that Trump threatened to withhold aid unless Ukraine investigated Joe Biden and his son.

Then Trump released the transcript, and it was so " damning " that Adam Schiff had to start the hearing with a totally made up and fake account of the call between Trump and the Ukrainian President

When called out on it, he claimed it was " parody "...:lamo And your'e whining about propaganda from Trump supporters..:roll:
 
When are the House Democrats going to vote on the impeachment inquiry ? We were told this was the worst scandal of Trump's Presidency, that there was a quid pro quo, that Trump threatened to withhold aid unless Ukraine investigated Joe Biden and his son.

Then Trump released the transcript, and it was so " damning " that Adam Schiff had to start the hearing with a totally made up and fake account of the call between Trump and the Ukrainian President

When called out on it, he claimed it was " parody "...:lamo And your'e whining about propaganda from Trump supporters..:roll:

A move to Formal Impeachment Inquiry does not require a vote on the floor. It requires EITHER the authorization of the Speaker (now given) or a vote on the floor. I would like a vote just to get everybody on the record but Pelosi does not need it. The whip count is now 225 and likely higher today. So she has the votes. I think we will see what the committees produce for Articles of Impeachment by Christmas and vote on the floor on the Articles then. The Articles are a result of the work of the House, not a predicate for it.

If the Articles or some Articles get a yes vote Trump will have been formally Impeached and the Articles move on to the Senate for their Removal review.
 
Keep it going, you're setting a new high for calling me a liar today.
I didn’t call you a liar. Forum rules don’t allow me to do that. What I did, and have unfortunately had to do numerous times, is to face you with your lies. That is permitted. And I’ll continue to call out your lies whenever I come across them.
 
WTH?

Sure that's it, impeachable all on it's own....

:screwy

His kids businesses are all exempt from his tariffs. Hes shutting all over the us.
 
Leftists with their TDS is a bizarre disorder. :mrgreen:

Your ****ty president is being impeached for his ****ty behavior.

Winning.
 
When are the House Democrats going to vote on the impeachment inquiry ?
Speaking of "supporters" only here to post propaganda...

We were told this was the worst scandal of Trump's Presidency
Oh, this GROWING SCANDAL just keeps getting bigger and bigger. I can provide some Yahoo articles to corroborate how big this GROWING SCANDAL is getting.

And your'e whining about propaganda from Trump supporters..:roll:
Oh, we've already established your posts are almost always just propaganda. Do I need to repost the proof of your obvious propaganda? I still have it, if you'd like to see it.
 
You did lie. It’s what you do all the time.

The opinion pieces you posted are current, about reopening or starting investigations now.

Your big fat lie was saying that Biden pressured Ukraine to drop an investigation when he was VP. That did not happen. You lied.

Hunter Biden sat on the board of a Ukrainian Gas company that was being investigated for corruption.

Joe Biden bragged ( there's a video and everything ) about leveraging one billion dollars in US aid to force the Ukrainian Govt to fire the prosecutor running that investigation.
He was fired and the investigation was closed and charges against the Companies owner were dismissed.

This narrative that the prosecutor was corrupt and Joe Biden pressured him because he wasn't doing enough to fight corruption ( including investigating Burisma Holdings ) doesn't make a lot of sense.
Firing the prosecutor effectively ended the investigation.
Take the above scenario and replace Hunter with Don Jr and Joe Biden with Donald Trump.
Would it be worth investigating ? Yes. Would the MSM an the Democrats run with it 24/7 ? Yes. Would Trump be impeached ? Yup ! And rightfully so.
 
When are the House Democrats going to vote on the impeachment inquiry ? We were told this was the worst scandal of Trump's Presidency, that there was a quid pro quo, that Trump threatened to withhold aid unless Ukraine investigated Joe Biden and his son.

Then Trump released the transcript, and it was so " damning " that Adam Schiff had to start the hearing with a totally made up and fake account of the call between Trump and the Ukrainian President

When called out on it, he claimed it was " parody "...:lamo And your'e whining about propaganda from Trump supporters..:roll:
And Schiffty wasn't yapping in front of the usual fawning press. He was entering it into the Congressional record, which is reprehensible.
 
Hunter Biden sat on the board of a Ukrainian Gas company that was being investigated for corruption.

Joe Biden bragged ( there's a video and everything ) about leveraging one billion dollars in US aid to force the Ukrainian Govt to fire the prosecutor running that investigation.
He was fired and the investigation was closed and charges against the Companies owner were dismissed.

This narrative that the prosecutor was corrupt and Joe Biden pressured him because he wasn't doing enough to fight corruption ( including investigating Burisma Holdings ) doesn't make a lot of sense.
Firing the prosecutor effectively ended the investigation.
Take the above scenario and replace Hunter with Don Jr and Joe Biden with Donald Trump.
Would it be worth investigating ? Yes. Would the MSM an the Democrats run with it 24/7 ? Yes. Would Trump be impeached ? Yup ! And rightfully so.
You’ve erred on a crucial point; at the time Biden went to Ukraine there was no ongoing investigation. VP Biden had no reason to threaten to withhold the money.

Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company tied to Joe Biden's son, explained - Business Insider

* Hunter Biden’s actions (and ridiculously high pay from Burisma) royally stank of profiting off his old man’s position, but to date there has been no finding of illegal behavior[/I].
 
Do you not keep up with current affairs ?

Sort of- Seems like some TDS whistleblower heard from somebody who heard from somebody that Trump said something really bad only to be embarassed when the call transcript was released.

And the same gang of liberal idiots ( press and Dem pols ) who falsely peddled the Russian collusion delusion ( only to be kneecapped by the Mueller report ) are now peddling the 'quid-pro-quo". delusion. It's all so tiresome.
 
I didn’t call you a liar. Forum rules don’t allow me to do that. What I did, and have unfortunately had to do numerous times, is to face you with your lies. That is permitted. And I’ll continue to call out your lies whenever I come across them.

I understand that. It's a lame policy, but I'm familiar with it.

That is why you claim everything I post is a lie, rather than saying I am a liar. It's exactly the same thing, but keeps you out of the dog house

Why don't you try posting something rational, and then defend it with facts and with links to support them?

So much better than just claiming I lied over an over, and spewing unsupported nonsense.

Probably a concept out of your reach and talent.
 
....for asking the Ukraine dude to look into Russian interference in the 2016 election???I thought they really were deep;ly troubled by that?

With all the impeachment talk from Democrats over the last 3 years, the Democratic House doesn't have a choice but to pass the articles of impeachment. It's just the timing. There's no way to get 67 senators to go along, so Trump will be found not guilty and remain as president.

This will harden each sides view of the other for the 2020 election. How that effects that election remains to be seen. Perhaps not by much as those views, pro and anti Trump has been pretty much set in concrete since the day after the election.

Impeachment and a trial in the senate is on its way. It just depends on when.
 
With all the impeachment talk from Democrats over the last 3 years, the Democratic House doesn't have a choice but to pass the articles of impeachment. It's just the timing. There's no way to get 67 senators to go along, so Trump will be found not guilty and remain as president.

This will harden each sides view of the other for the 2020 election. How that effects that election remains to be seen. Perhaps not by much as those views, pro and anti Trump has been pretty much set in concrete since the day after the election.

Impeachment and a trial in the senate is on its way. It just depends on when.

It is. Then again McConnell may stonewall the trial. That would be glorious because it would utterly ensure the Republicans lose everything.

Then the tyranny of theocratic prohibition will finally come to its inglorious and moldering end.
 
You’ve erred on a crucial point; at the time Biden went to Ukraine there was no ongoing investigation. VP Biden had no reason to threaten to withhold the money.

Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company tied to Joe Biden's son, explained - Business Insider

* Hunter Biden’s actions (and ridiculously high pay from Burisma) royally stank of profiting off his old man’s position, but to date there has been no finding of illegal behavior[/I].
It can be seen as a warning shot across the bow and of course, a threat.
 

LOL

The failing MSM must be grateful there are enough gullible rubes in their target audience to keep the doors open a bit longer......

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2018/07/24/ivanka-trump-shuts-down-her-namesake-clothing-brand/

Ivanka Trump Is Shutting Down Her Fashion Brand - The New York Times

July 24, 2018

Ivanka Trump, President Trump’s elder daughter and a top White House adviser, said on Tuesday that she was shutting down her namesake fashion brand more than a year after stepping away from her company
 
LOL

The failing MSM must be grateful there are enough gullible rubes in their target audience to keep the doors open a bit longer......

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2018/07/24/ivanka-trump-shuts-down-her-namesake-clothing-brand/

Ivanka Trump Is Shutting Down Her Fashion Brand - The New York Times

July 24, 2018

Ivanka Trump, President Trump’s elder daughter and a top White House adviser, said on Tuesday that she was shutting down her namesake fashion brand more than a year after stepping away from her company

Lmao yeah. I don't care what you post. Fake news.
 
Lmao yeah. I don't care what you post. Fake news.

So the NYT and WaPa, your leaders from your information industries, are fake news?

Well, I can't argue with you there.

What sources do you approve of, so I can use them to show your post about Ivanka and Trump's children being excluded from tariffs is full of ****?
 
It is. Then again McConnell may stonewall the trial. That would be glorious because it would utterly ensure the Republicans lose everything.

Then the tyranny of theocratic prohibition will finally come to its inglorious and moldering end.

I highly doubt it. That is unless it is a month or two prior to the election. Perhaps the political savvy Pelosi is waiting for just that. For her and the Democrats to get all the political advantage they can from impeachment.
 
I understand that. It's a lame policy, but I'm familiar with it.

That is why you claim everything I post is a lie, rather than saying I am a liar. It's exactly the same thing, but keeps you out of the dog house

Why don't you try posting something rational, and then defend it with facts and with links to support them?

So much better than just claiming I lied over an over, and spewing unsupported nonsense.

Probably a concept out of your reach and talent.
I (and others here) have repeatedly and irrefutably proven a number of your lies. You denying that you routinely lie is just another lie.
 
I (and others here) have repeatedly and irrefutably proven a number of your lies. You denying that you routinely lie is just another lie.

You've done nothing of the sort.

All you have are personal attacks, which proves you've got nothing.

You make it so easy to ignore you.
 
It can be seen as a warning shot across the bow and of course, a threat.
A “shot across the bow” is a colloquialism for a warning to stop doing something.

What Trump did was attempted extortion, which is defined as a form of theft that occurs when an offender obtains money, property, or services from another person through coercion. To constitute coercion, the necessary act can be the threat of violence, destruction of property, or improper government action.
 
Back
Top Bottom