• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Can we all agree Greta Thunberg is creepy as hell?

Mashmont said:
I do feel bad for making fun of an intellectually impaired child. I don't know why they trotted out somebody with her disability.
Click to expand...

What's wrong with 'trotting her out ', simply because she has a disability ?
 
Logician Man said:
What's wrong with 'trotting her out ', simply because she has a disability ?
Click to expand...

They knew she would people would perceive her as weird and creepy, yet her handlers let it happen. Horrible.
 
Mashmont said:
They knew she would people would perceive her as weird and creepy, yet her handlers let it happen. Horrible.
Click to expand...

Please provide a valid link to support your positive claim ---->/// They knew....///.
 
ultmd said:
:lamo
Or, more likely...maybe he's not an ignorant science denier, like so many of his pea-brained, irrational, science-denying haters. You know, the Obama Derangement Syndrome types.

Btw, do you have any idea about the actual elevation of the estate that Obama recently purchased? Or, are you really just talking out of your @ss again, as I suspect?

Face it, you people are just eaten (rotten...like fetid carcasses) by your hatred for the Obamas. And when I say "rotten", I'm talking about...from your brains to your butts...just completely rotten.
Click to expand...

Here you go. It has nothing to do with Obama purchasing it. It has to do with its location. It's the standard, do as I say, not as I do hypocrisy we always get from the left. Sort of like Biden spending $900,000 on private jets over a three month span while wailing that "We have to act NOW!!!" Total hypocrisy.

Sea Level Rise Dooms Obama’s New Martha’s Vineyard Mansion | Watts Up With That?

The Vineyard Gazette - Martha's Vineyard News | The Hard Facts About Sea Level Rise
 
Last edited:
Mashmont said:
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Invest in Democrats - OpenSecrets News omg. busted.
Click to expand...
:lamo
That's the SAME link....from 2008.

Are you trying to convince that you're a dullard, or what? Like you, that has already been discredited and dismissed, because (as I previously stated), the FACT is that the GOP controlled BOTH houses of Congress for TEN years prior to the Bush market collapse...and during that time Fannie/Freddie contributed mostly to the GOP, NOT to the Democratic Party.

So, you claimed that Fannie/Freddie are "Democrat controlled"...and that was a LIE. Period. End of discussion.

Both numbers are wrong. And the market didn't rise after 0bummer was elected;
Click to expand...
Again, you are either REALLY ignorant, or just lying. Hard to figure out which, with people like.

But the FACT is that there was so much optimism when Obama was elected (Nov 2008), that EVEN IN THE MIDST of the worst worst market collapse since the Great Depression, we saw the "Strongest Election Day Stock Rally in 24 Years". The DOW and NASDAQ actually ROSE 3%, while the S&P rose 4% in response to Obama's crushing election day victory over McCain. But, thereafter, the Bull market resumed until it bottomed out in late Feb/early March of 2009. The DOW's high in Nov 2008 was 10,674. The DOW's high in Dec 2008 was 10,715. When the Bull market resumed, the DOW had plummeted to 7,700 on inauguration day 2009. Over Obama's first 3 years in office, the market DRASTICALLY outperformed compared to Trump's first 3 years. Here, READ a little, and learn:
Dow Jones drops below 8,000 on bank worries - The New York Times
S&P 500 Has Performed Far Worse Under Trump Than Under Obama

Stock Market Performance by President

DOW 20-Year Historical Chart



it fell another 3000 because everyone was so damned depressed about a socialist taking over.
Click to expand...
Another ignorant opinion, popular with you people in the white nationalist/anti-obama crowd. The Bush Recession had nothing to do with Obama, other than ensuring his election in a landslide because the public was fed up with the GOP's policies. It began long before the 2008 election, and continued well into the summer of 2009. Of course, you know that. But honesty is not a virtue that you possess.


The truth is everybody was depressed as hell a Communist took over the economy. Consumer confidence was the pits.
Click to expand...
:lamo
No, only the bigots and racists. Every decent American was enthusiastic, if not ecstatic about Obama's victory. But I have no doubt that people in your family and social circles were "depressed as hell". And that makes me smile, because whatever makes you people upset is generally good for the country (and the world).


Oh, sorry, but you don't get to give Idiot Boy credit for the rapid rise of the market AFTER Trump was elected. The market actually dropped in the 12 months prior to the 2016 election, but within three days after the election, it immediately rose 1000 points, then another 1000 by December. All because of consumer optimism because of Trump.
Click to expand...
Once again, we don't need to rely upon the idiotic analyses of people like you. We have FACTS we can rely upon. You don't want to compare the actual market performances under Obama and Trump, do you?
Stock Market Performance by President
S&P 500 Has Performed Far Worse Under Trump Than Under Obama

I cut out most of your insults, mainly to spare you embarrassment.
Click to expand...
LOL, stop whining. When I say your comments reflect your ignorance, I'm not name-calling. I'm truth-calling.

But I think you now see why Mashmont is undefeated in debate. You just got a quick education. But don't worry. No charge.
Click to expand...
:lamo
I think we ALL understand that Mashmont is "undefeated" in the same way that your Dear Leader has "never lied". And, much like him, the fun part is that you don't see that the joke is on you, around here.
 
veritas1 said:
Here you go. It has nothing to do with Obama purchasing it. It has to do with its location. It's the standard, do as I say, not as I do hypocrisy we always get from the left.
Click to expand...
Really? Tell us, then...what EXACTLY has Obama said about about buying property along the Massachusetts coast? When did he say "do live or buy property on the coast in 2019?". Please, be specific.

No, this has everything to do with the unhealthy obsession you people have with President Obama. Your hypocrisy is boundless.

Sort of like Biden spending $900,000 on private jets over a three month span while wailing that "We have to act NOW!!!" Total hypocrisy.
Click to expand...
Nice Hannity/FauxNews talking point, there. But most people aren't dumb enough to take that seriously.


Sea Level Rise Dooms Obama’s New Martha’s Vineyard Mansion | Watts Up With That?
Click to expand...
Watts Up with That - Media Bias/Fact Check
"Overall, we rate Watts Up with That a strong pseudoscience and conspiracy website based on the promotion of consistent human influenced climate denialism propaganda."

Sorry, big fail for you. Try again.

The Vineyard Gazette - Martha's Vineyard News | The Hard Facts About Sea Level Rise
Click to expand...
See level rise of 5 feet by the end of this century.

And...?

What does that have to do with owning property along the coasts in 2019? More importanly, do you not understand how insurance works? Or, more likely, is it just that you are blinded by hate/bigotry and irrationally obsessed with the Obamas, who demonstrate more grace, dignity and humanity in a day than the Trumps (and their deplorable minions) can muster up in their lifetimes?

I think it's obviously the latter. :lamo
 
RaleBulgarian said:
Calling my rebuttal “goofy” is goofy. It was spot on accurate and succinct. As Trump would say “it was perfect”. ;)


Uhm ... you’re slipping, Fail. At no point in our conversation did we discuss any legislation.
Click to expand...

No.....you are just not comprehending. You brought up my moniker and claimed it made me look partisan. I am explaining to you what my moniker is about. If Ronald Reagan or Trump had pushed and passed the so-called affordable healthcare act, I would bash the legislation just as harsly.
 
ObamacareFail said:
No.....you are just not comprehending. You brought up my moniker and claimed it made me look partisan. I am explaining to you what my moniker is about. If Ronald Reagan or Trump had pushed and passed the so-called affordable healthcare act, I would bash the legislation just as harsly.
Click to expand...
Your moniker is in alignment with the rest of your comments. If it weren’t, your explanation might be a little believable.
 
veritas1 said:
I know it's surrounded by water. According to the chicken littles, you need to be looking for a safer place.
Click to expand...

While a good portion of NZ is indeed at sea-level and our capital city is likely to have problems further on a lot of NZ is above 200ms above sea level. Further to your comment several Pacific Island nations have indeed begun to lose land to rising seas (as NZ has too at the coastal margins.) It would seem that your "chicken littles" are correct.
 
Kiwimac said:
While a good portion of NZ is indeed at sea-level and our capital city is likely to have problems further on a lot of NZ is above 200ms above sea level. Further to your comment several Pacific Island nations have indeed begun to lose land to rising seas (as NZ has too at the coastal margins.) It would seem that your "chicken littles" are correct.
Click to expand...

Coastal areas are always losing land and it has been going on long before the climate change hysteria started, like for centuries.
 
ultmd said:
Really? Tell us, then...what EXACTLY has Obama said about about buying property along the Massachusetts coast? When did he say "do live or buy property on the coast in 2019?". Please, be specific.

No, this has everything to do with the unhealthy obsession you people have with President Obama. Your hypocrisy is boundless.


Nice Hannity/FauxNews talking point, there. But most people aren't dumb enough to take that seriously.



Watts Up with That - Media Bias/Fact Check
"Overall, we rate Watts Up with That a strong pseudoscience and conspiracy website based on the promotion of consistent human influenced climate denialism propaganda."

Sorry, big fail for you. Try again.


See level rise of 5 feet by the end of this century.

And...?

What does that have to do with owning property along the coasts in 2019? More importanly, do you not understand how insurance works? Or, more likely, is it just that you are blinded by hate/bigotry and irrationally obsessed with the Obamas, who demonstrate more grace, dignity and humanity in a day than the Trumps (and their deplorable minions) can muster up in their lifetimes?

I think it's obviously the latter. :lamo
Click to expand...

Uh, the point, which you intentionally miss, is that the left doesn't walk the walk. They are frauds. If they believe in the hysteria they promote, they should act accordingly. They should not be buying waterfront property when they tell others not to. They should not be flying on private jets like Biden and Sanders constantly are, while bleating that we may have to get rid of air travel to save the planet. They are hypocrites and you attack anyone pointing out the obvious.

I also find it humorous that you accuse people who rightly point out the fraudulence of the left as being into "pseudoscience". The sea level of Martha's Vineyard is simply a geologic fact. If what the hysterics claim is true, they shouldn't be buying property on islands and waterfronts. They shouldn't be flying on private jets. They shouldn't be wagging their stinking fingers at others while doing as they please. We will justly point out their hypocrisy and keep them and their lemming followers from getting the power they need to ram their nonsense down our throats.
 
Last edited:
ultmd said:
:lamo
That's the SAME link....from 2008.

Are you trying to convince that you're a dullard, or what? Like you, that has already been discredited and dismissed, because (as I previously stated), the FACT is that the GOP controlled BOTH houses of Congress for TEN years prior to the Bush market collapse...and during that time Fannie/Freddie contributed mostly to the GOP, NOT to the Democratic Party.

So, you claimed that Fannie/Freddie are "Democrat controlled"...and that was a LIE. Period. End of discussion.


Again, you are either REALLY ignorant, or just lying. Hard to figure out which, with people like.

But the FACT is that there was so much optimism when Obama was elected (Nov 2008), that EVEN IN THE MIDST of the worst worst market collapse since the Great Depression, we saw the "Strongest Election Day Stock Rally in 24 Years". The DOW and NASDAQ actually ROSE 3%, while the S&P rose 4% in response to Obama's crushing election day victory over McCain. But, thereafter, the Bull market resumed until it bottomed out in late Feb/early March of 2009. The DOW's high in Nov 2008 was 10,674. The DOW's high in Dec 2008 was 10,715. When the Bull market resumed, the DOW had plummeted to 7,700 on inauguration day 2009. Over Obama's first 3 years in office, the market DRASTICALLY outperformed compared to Trump's first 3 years. Here, READ a little, and learn:
Dow Jones drops below 8,000 on bank worries - The New York Times
S&P 500 Has Performed Far Worse Under Trump Than Under Obama

Stock Market Performance by President

DOW 20-Year Historical Chart




Another ignorant opinion, popular with you people in the white nationalist/anti-obama crowd. The Bush Recession had nothing to do with Obama, other than ensuring his election in a landslide because the public was fed up with the GOP's policies. It began long before the 2008 election, and continued well into the summer of 2009. Of course, you know that. But honesty is not a virtue that you possess.



:lamo
No, only the bigots and racists. Every decent American was enthusiastic, if not ecstatic about Obama's victory. But I have no doubt that people in your family and social circles were "depressed as hell". And that makes me smile, because whatever makes you people upset is generally good for the country (and the world).



Once again, we don't need to rely upon the idiotic analyses of people like you. We have FACTS we can rely upon. You don't want to compare the actual market performances under Obama and Trump, do you?
Stock Market Performance by President
S&P 500 Has Performed Far Worse Under Trump Than Under Obama


LOL, stop whining. When I say your comments reflect your ignorance, I'm not name-calling. I'm truth-calling.


:lamo
I think we ALL understand that Mashmont is "undefeated" in the same way that your Dear Leader has "never lied". And, much like him, the fun part is that you don't see that the joke is on you, around here.
Click to expand...

Again, 0bummer doesn't get credit for the inevitable rebound of a recession he and his party caused. He didn't 'create' a great market. Nothing he did would have caused it. The 0bummer socialist agenda retarded the markets. It wasn't until the great Trump was elected that the 0bummer malaise lifted. Consider this if doubt me. In the four months after Trump was elected, the stock market rose 3000 points. In the four months after 0bummer was elected, it fell 3000 points. Those two statistics speak volumes.
 
veritas1 said:
Uh, the point, which you intentionally miss, is that the left doesn't walk the walk. They are frauds. If they believe in the hysteria they promote, they should act accordingly. They should not be buying waterfront property when they tell others not to. They should not be flying on private jets like Biden and Sanders constantly are, while bleating that we may have to get rid of air travel to save the planet. They are hypocrites and you attack anyone pointing out the obvious.

I also find it humorous that you accuse people who rightly point out the fraudulence of the left as being into "pseudoscience". The sea level of Martha's Vineyard is simply a geologic fact. If what the hysterics claim is true, they shouldn't be buying property on islands and waterfronts. They shouldn't be flying on private jets. They shouldn't be wagging their stinking fingers at others while doing as they please. We will justly point out their hypocrisy and keep them and their lemming followers from getting the power they need to ram their nonsense down our throats.
Click to expand...

Sea Level | Vital Signs – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
 
RaleBulgarian said:
Your moniker is in alignment with the rest of your comments. If it weren’t, your explanation might be a little believable.
Click to expand...

Your opinion is noted and utterly rejected. My moniker is my own personal protest against a piece of **** piece of legislation. Any other interpretation is just you making up what you want it to be.
 
ObamacareFail said:
Your opinion is noted and utterly rejected. My moniker is my own personal protest against a piece of **** piece of legislation. Any other interpretation is just you making up what you want it to be.
Click to expand...
Uh-huh.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom