• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tulsi Gabbard Blasts Google Censorship.

Captain Adverse

Captain Adverse

Classical Liberal Sage
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
20,269
Reaction score
28,072
Location
Mid-West USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
This lady interests me. She caught my attention during reprises of her slamming of Kamala Harris during that first debate.

She is currently suing Google for alleged improprieties affecting searches after that first debate.

Here is a video of two of her "speeches" after the incident:



She states she is intrigued by some of the responses to her lawsuit. That some progressive voices assert she's just trying to grab headlines. Meanwhile, she hears some conservatives saying that they are happy someone is standing up for freedom of speech.

She asks "why the disparity?"

IMO her best line is "We as a country cannot afford to only stand up to fight for our freedoms when we are the target. But when someone else is [the target], we turn our backs and walk away."

That sounds like some of us who have said "I may not agree with what you have to say, but I will fight for your right to say it."

I hope she gets to go the whole nine yards in these debates. I don't know much else that she stands for, but this is something I agree with.
 
Last edited:
The more I learn about her the more I like her. If she is on the ballot for my state in the primary she is going to get my vote.
 
Tulsi Gabbard is for literally every single position that would cause every Republican in the country to spontaneously combust if just one quarter of her policies were made law, and yet every Republican on this site claims he would vote for her if given the chance.

Tulsi Gabbard Views on 2020 Issues: A Voter’s Guide - POLITICO

Gee, what could we possibly be missing here?
 
Cardinal said:
Tulsi Gabbard is for literally every single position that would cause every Republican in the country to spontaneously combust if just one quarter of her policies were made law, and yet every Republican on this site claims he would vote for her if given the chance.

Tulsi Gabbard Views on 2020 Issues: A Voter’s Guide - POLITICO

Gee, what could we possibly be missing here?
Click to expand...

I don't think I would support her in the general, but of the Democrats running she is the best option, so for that reason she will get my support in the primary if she's on the ballot.
 
Chillfolks said:
I don't think I would support her in the general, but of the Democrats running she is the best option, so for that reason she will get my support in the primary if she's on the ballot.
Click to expand...

Ah, okay, so you would vote in the primary for the candidate you believe would lose the general.

Got it.
 
Captain Adverse said:
This lady interests me. She caught my attention during reprises of her slamming of Kamala Harris during that first debate.

She is currently suing Google for alleged improprieties affecting searches after that first debate.

Here is a video of two of her "speeches" after the incident:



She states she is intrigued by some of the responses to her lawsuit. That some progressive voices assert she's just trying to grab headlines. Meanwhile, she hears some conservatives saying that they are happy someone is standing up for freedom of speech.

She asks "why the disparity?"

IMO her best line is "We as a country cannot afford to only stand up to fight for our freedoms when we are the target. But when someone else is [the target], we turn our backs and walk away."

That sounds like some of us who have said "I may not agree with what you have to say, but I will fight for your right to say it."

I hope she gets to go the whole nine yards in these debates. I don't know much else that she stands for, but this is something I agree with.
Click to expand...


Well this one makes sense: "Google reportedly cited “problems with billing information or violations of our advertising policies,” then “suspicious behavior in the payment activity in your account,” before reinstating the account."

It happens to the best of us and I wouldn't be surprised if someone tried to tamper with her account for political reasons.

And how the hell do you sue a company for First Amendment violation?
 
Cardinal said:
Ah, okay, so you would vote in the primary for the candidate you believe would lose the general.

Got it.
Click to expand...

I would exercise my right sure thing because its my right. As for the general it depends on if she backs off on some of her issues. If not I'll vote 3rd party.
 
Cardinal said:
Tulsi Gabbard is for literally every single position that would cause every Republican in the country to spontaneously combust if just one quarter of her policies were made law, and yet every Republican on this site claims he would vote for her if given the chance.

Tulsi Gabbard Views on 2020 Issues: A Voter’s Guide - POLITICO

Gee, what could we possibly be missing here?
Click to expand...

Good thing I am not a Republican.

I agree with her on some things, indifferent on others, and oppose her on some things.

Unfortunately, I am a strong libertarian view of gun-ownership via 2A supporter. So while I agree with more things (and indifferent to some things) than I oppose, that would prevent me from voting for her.

Thanks for the list. While she loses me on gun rights, I could have voted for her otherwise.
 
Last edited:
Captain Adverse said:
This lady interests me. She caught my attention during reprises of her slamming of Kamala Harris during that first debate.

She is currently suing Google for alleged improprieties affecting searches after that first debate.

Here is a video of two of her "speeches" after the incident:



She states she is intrigued by some of the responses to her lawsuit. That some progressive voices assert she's just trying to grab headlines. Meanwhile, she hears some conservatives saying that they are happy someone is standing up for freedom of speech.

She asks "why the disparity?"

IMO her best line is "We as a country cannot afford to only stand up to fight for our freedoms when we are the target. But when someone else is [the target], we turn our backs and walk away."

That sounds like some of us who have said "I may not agree with what you have to say, but I will fight for your right to say it."

I hope she gets to go the whole nine yards in these debates. I don't know much else that she stands for, but this is something I agree with.
Click to expand...


Google is crooked.
 
Captain Adverse said:
This lady interests me. She caught my attention during reprises of her slamming of Kamala Harris during that first debate.

She is currently suing Google for alleged improprieties affecting searches after that first debate.

Here is a video of two of her "speeches" after the incident:



She states she is intrigued by some of the responses to her lawsuit. That some progressive voices assert she's just trying to grab headlines. Meanwhile, she hears some conservatives saying that they are happy someone is standing up for freedom of speech.

She asks "why the disparity?"

IMO her best line is "We as a country cannot afford to only stand up to fight for our freedoms when we are the target. But when someone else is [the target], we turn our backs and walk away."

That sounds like some of us who have said "I may not agree with what you have to say, but I will fight for your right to say it."

I hope she gets to go the whole nine yards in these debates. I don't know much else that she stands for, but this is something I agree with.
Click to expand...


Tulsi = Awesome

I hope she gets to the next debate to take down Warren the way she did Harris.
 
This case is a VERY big deal.

What Google did is thoroughly unconscionable.

In other words, Google!
 
Personally, I like her. The only consistent and sane democrat out there.
 
Chillfolks said:
The more I learn about her the more I like her. If she is on the ballot for my state in the primary she is going to get my vote.
Click to expand...

That Democrats won't support the only candidate they have who has ANY chance of beating Trump tells you everything about who they really are.

Arsonists pure & simple.

:shrug:
 
Motti said:
Personally, I like her. The only consistent and sane democrat out there.
Click to expand...

John Delaney seems pretty consistent and sane to me.
 
Cardinal said:
Tulsi Gabbard is for literally every single position that would cause every Republican in the country to spontaneously combust if just one quarter of her policies were made law, and yet every Republican on this site claims he would vote for her if given the chance.

Tulsi Gabbard Views on 2020 Issues: A Voter’s Guide - POLITICO

Gee, what could we possibly be missing here?
Click to expand...

yeah her stance is spot on, the only thing i disagree with is nuclear power, but thats not a very big deal for me.
 
nota bene said:
John Delaney seems pretty consistent and sane to me.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but he lacks the razzle-dazzle; better to be inspire ANY kind of feeling than none.

Tulsi's not just sane, but the sexist candidate to run since JFK, and that was what - 100 years ago?
 
3leftsdoo said:
Yeah, but he lacks the razzle-dazzle; better to be inspire ANY kind of feeling than none.

Tulsi's not just sane, but the sexist candidate to run since JFK, and that was what - 100 years ago?
Click to expand...

I think you meant "sexiest"? ;)
 
Captain Adverse said:
This lady interests me. She caught my attention during reprises of her slamming of Kamala Harris during that first debate.

She is currently suing Google for alleged improprieties affecting searches after that first debate.

Here is a video of two of her "speeches" after the incident:



She states she is intrigued by some of the responses to her lawsuit. That some progressive voices assert she's just trying to grab headlines. Meanwhile, she hears some conservatives saying that they are happy someone is standing up for freedom of speech.

She asks "why the disparity?"

IMO her best line is "We as a country cannot afford to only stand up to fight for our freedoms when we are the target. But when someone else is [the target], we turn our backs and walk away."

That sounds like some of us who have said "I may not agree with what you have to say, but I will fight for your right to say it."

I hope she gets to go the whole nine yards in these debates. I don't know much else that she stands for, but this is something I agree with.
Click to expand...


Tulsi mostly stands for ending these illegitimate wars of choice our government is engaged in. I'm with her.

As an old white guy, I want badly to vote for a young leader instead of the senile candidates delivered by our duopoly. I will vote for her if she can make the cut.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom