• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Corrupt Trump

Billionaire John Paulson to host NYC fundraiser for Trump | Fox Business

Trump running against Wall St. was a laughing stock in 2016 and it continues to be a laughing stock now. Trump is going to continue doing the fake populist routine, but look at the billionaires who back him and you'll know it's all lies.

Since 2016. How much has Obama's net worth increased? I know its nothing approaching POTUS, but where do ya'll draw the line? Obama's increased their wealth 3000%

-VySky


Barack Obama Net Worth After Presidency Increased Nearly 3000%
 
dupe. Sorry
 
Since 2016. How much has Obama's net worth increased? I know its nothing approaching POTUS, but where do ya'll draw the line? Obama's increased their wealth 3000%

-VySky


Barack Obama Net Worth After Presidency Increased Nearly 3000%

67260592d1564068305-democrats-do-you-feel-mueller-testimony-today-15895164_1214673228623688_8808714500422641427_n-jpg
 

Not at all. I wasn't around when Obama was POTUS. But can you point me to a thread where ya'll were outraged over Obama's ascent within the evil 1%?

-VySky
 
Not at all. I wasn't around when Obama was POTUS. But can you point me to a thread where ya'll were outraged over Obama's ascent to the evil 1%?

-VySky

You're new around here so let me help you out with something.

When the thread topic is about Donald Trump, you are expected to discuss Donald Trump or leave.

When the thread topic is about Hillary Clinton, you are expected to discuss Hillary Clinton or leave.

Failure to do this is called whataboutism, and it is a classic sign that you can't refute the OP. :)
 
You're new around here so let me help you out with something.

When the thread topic is about Donald Trump, you are expected to discuss Donald Trump or leave.

When the thread topic is about Hillary Clinton, you are expected to discuss Hillary Clinton or leave.

Failure to do this is called whataboutism, and it is a classic sign that you can't refute the OP. :)

What you expect and reality are two different things. Nov 2016 is a prime example :lamo

-VySky
 
Since 2016. How much has Obama's net worth increased? I know its nothing approaching POTUS, but where do ya'll draw the line? Obama's increased their wealth 3000%

-VySky


Barack Obama Net Worth After Presidency Increased Nearly 3000%

You seem to have a problem with an ex President of the U.S. actually earning money AFTER he leaves the office of the presidency. Why is that? This is a democracy, he's allowed to make money just like anyone else. Barack Obama never profited personally from his presidency while in office, nothing that even came close to violating the emoluments clause. Once he became a private citizen he had every right to purchase a production company, write a best-seller or earn money doing speaking engagements. While a president is in office, they are prohibited from profiting off the very fact that they are the president.

Donald Trump has not given up control of his for-profit businesses as he pretends at the task of playing president. Members of Trump's transition team or, more likely, government ethics officials were at least able enough to convey how grotesquely improper that was, to the point where Trump was obliged to pantomime handing those companies' management over to his adult children, but he did not financially divest from those companies, as literally every other modern president was expected to do as a matter of basic norms.

The whole thing has been a charade. A fraud. And as we hear, every month, of new instances in which government agencies, the military, the Secret Service, or the thoroughly toadying vice president have been forced to put government money into Trump's businesses and therefore his own pockets, the pretense that Trump is somehow uninvolved with this grift of his own making is at this point barely pretensed.

The New York Times cites current and former White House officials to report that Trump "spends more time talking about his properties in private than he does in public, and even as president, remains intimately involved with club minutiae, like knowing all the names on his Mar-a-Lago membership roll." To spell that out: Trump's private business invites well-heeled supplicants to pay cash to Donald's for-profit club. Trump is intimately involved with learning all the names that have given him those cash infusions.

The so-called president is a crook. He is a grifter, a con man, a petty thief, a narcissistic twit, a liar, and a tax cheat. There's no question about any of these things, but the punditry and lawmakers alike pretend either that they don’t notice or that the swindler's many transgressions are not so different from the pre-existing ethical lines as to require consternation. To recognize otherwise would require raising voices or doing more work, two things that professional politics-knowers loathe from the core of their souls.

We'll know the extent of all this corruption only after he is gone. Then we will be able to quantify just how much corruption the rest of Washington, in the press and in his party, were willing to help cover up. And it will be pathetic to see what sort of petty grifting it took for half of our political leadership to abandon whatever convictions its leading con man required it to abandon.
 
Not at all. I wasn't around when Obama was POTUS. But can you point me to a thread where ya'll were outraged over Obama's ascent within the evil 1%?

-VySky

Why would anyone be outraged that after Obama left office he made money by writing books?

Democrats and liberals don't believe that the 1% are evil. Warren Buffet is at the very top of the 1% and he supports raising taxes on people like him. You don't seem to understand what most Democrats and liberals believe. You're confused.
 
You seem to have a problem with an ex President of the U.S. actually earning money AFTER he leaves the office of the presidency. Why is that? This is a democracy, he's allowed to make money just like anyone else. Barack Obama never profited personally from his presidency while in office, nothing that even came close to violating the emoluments clause. Once he became a private citizen he had every right to purchase a production company, write a best-seller or earn money doing speaking engagements. While a president is in office, they are prohibited from profiting off the very fact that they are the president.

Donald Trump has not given up control of his for-profit businesses as he pretends at the task of playing president. Members of Trump's transition team or, more likely, government ethics officials were at least able enough to convey how grotesquely improper that was, to the point where Trump was obliged to pantomime handing those companies' management over to his adult children, but he did not financially divest from those companies, as literally every other modern president was expected to do as a matter of basic norms.

The whole thing has been a charade. A fraud. And as we hear, every month, of new instances in which government agencies, the military, the Secret Service, or the thoroughly toadying vice president have been forced to put government money into Trump's businesses and therefore his own pockets, the pretense that Trump is somehow uninvolved with this grift of his own making is at this point barely pretensed.

The New York Times cites current and former White House officials to report that Trump "spends more time talking about his properties in private than he does in public, and even as president, remains intimately involved with club minutiae, like knowing all the names on his Mar-a-Lago membership roll." To spell that out: Trump's private business invites well-heeled supplicants to pay cash to Donald's for-profit club. Trump is intimately involved with learning all the names that have given him those cash infusions.

The so-called president is a crook. He is a grifter, a con man, a petty thief, a narcissistic twit, a liar, and a tax cheat. There's no question about any of these things, but the punditry and lawmakers alike pretend either that they don’t notice or that the swindler's many transgressions are not so different from the pre-existing ethical lines as to require consternation. To recognize otherwise would require raising voices or doing more work, two things that professional politics-knowers loathe from the core of their souls.

We'll know the extent of all this corruption only after he is gone. Then we will be able to quantify just how much corruption the rest of Washington, in the press and in his party, were willing to help cover up. And it will be pathetic to see what sort of petty grifting it took for half of our political leadership to abandon whatever convictions its leading con man required it to abandon.

I was only pointing out how ironic it was that Obama's campaign mantra was to rail against the 1%. And it worked

-VySky

BARACK OBAMA: When the top 1% amass a bigger and bigger and a bigger share of wealth and income, the concern among many in our countries is that the game if fixed against them. And it doesn't help when sometimes those who benefit from globalization appear to use their political power to further undermine the position of workers... And it is part of what leads people to turn to populist alternatives that may not actually deliver, but are tempting...

We're going to have to find a way to push back on propaganda and cultivate independent journalism, and listen to those with whom we disagree.

In Canada, Barack Obama Warns Against "The 1%," And Also Against "Populist Alternatives" | Video | RealClearPolitics
 
Since 2016. How much has Obama's net worth increased? I know its nothing approaching POTUS, but where do ya'll draw the line? Obama's increased their wealth 3000%

-VySky


Barack Obama Net Worth After Presidency Increased Nearly 3000%

Obama shouldn't have taken money from CitiGroup and Trump shouldn't have ran as a populist and lied to the electorate, in order to win votes, and then turn around and put Goldman Sachs in his administration. Most people don't like being lied to but, Trump fans seem to love it.
 
#Draintheswamp :lamo
 
Since 2016. How much has Obama's net worth increased? I know its nothing approaching POTUS, but where do ya'll draw the line? Obama's increased their wealth 3000%

-VySky


Barack Obama Net Worth After Presidency Increased Nearly 3000%

Yes, mostly through selling books and movie deals, and speaking fees. Barack Obama's have sold over one million so far-and he wrote them himself, unlike Trump who had to get someone to ghost his pitifully inept efforts at self-promotion because he's functionally illiterate. Schwartz, his writer, doesn't think much of him either:

Donald Trump's Ghostwriter Reckons He's The "Most Purely Evil Human Being" He's Met

All the Obama's earnings are 100% legitimate. I'm not sure I can say the same of Trump, given his record:

Barack and Michelle Obama net worth 2019: How much is the former US President worth along with his wife? | London Evening Standard
 
Last edited:
Tgh, I really don't recall anyone running against Wall Street in 2016 except Bernie.
 
Tgh, I really don't recall anyone running against Wall Street in 2016 except Bernie.

Trump attacked HRC for taking their money and said you don't have to worry about that with me cause I'm self financing. (Total lie)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom