• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tell the truth Republicans. Did you guys really not know that Donald Trump with this corrupt?

Just as any door to door salesman knows, 30% of the population is easily manipulated. Putin figured out the exact 30% trump needed to win and he made it happen with trumps blessings and assistance...

I have heard some pretty lame excuses as to why Hillary lost, this one wins the prize as the most idiotic. Congratulations.

Putin was able to do what no other candidate could figure out because he needed Trump to kill a bunch of Russians in Syria, expel 60 of his Russian Oligarchs from the US, and provide weapons to Ukraine. Do you even realize how stupid that statement is?
 
And what's the most funny is she's still a thousand times more honest than Donald Trump.

You simply voted for a crook. Not unlike someone in Chicago or Oakland.

Hahahahahaha........good one!
 
Just as any door to door salesman knows, 30% of the population is easily manipulated. Putin figured out the exact 30% trump needed to win and he made it happen with trumps blessings and assistance...

I have heard some pretty lame excuses as to why Hillary lost, this one wins the prize as the most idiotic. Congratulations.

Putin was able to do what no other candidate could figure out because he needed Trump to kill a bunch of Russians in Syria, expel 60 of his Russian Oligarchs from the US, and provide weapons to Ukraine. Do you even realize how stupid that statement is?
 
What point of corruption are we talking about? CNN has been crying wolf so long I just want to know exactly to what this thread pertains?

The thread doesn't specify, meaning it applies to the entirety of Trumps behavior, so why are you asking about specific points, and then jumping on the Trump bandwagon by bashing news that isn't working directly with him on Republican messaging?
 
Has Trump been indicted for anything yet? Impeached?
No? How boring.

Klattu coems in with a dodge as well. Ignores the question and asks a question of his own.
Has Trump been indicted (when everyone knows now a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted)?

That's KLATTU's dodge, sure, but then he appears to set out a standard that *cannot be met*.

Too funny.
 
...was this corrupt.

He's been the same way since the 1980s. All you had to do was open your eyes or do a little research to find out how the guy operates. None of this was a secret. Did you just ignore the truth because you wanted 1 or 2 things?

Or is this all about guaranteeing that the 1st president after the 1st minority president was someone who could be savage to your political opponents?

I couldn't be sure about Trump. But I knew Hillary was corrupt to the bone. Along with Pelosi, Reed, and a host of other Democrats who are also corrupt or facing charges. Or in prison. Or out now. Or going back soon. Liberals, you don't hold the moral high ground here, so best not to play the corruption card.
 
I did not know Trump was this corrupt when he was elected.

I thought Trump was obviously entirely unqualified, and was using his money and celebrity to become more popular to enrich himself with more money and power and celebrity.
I figured he'd be a mess, but I assumed anyone that unqualified would use handlers and delegate, like Bush Jr. who let Cheney run the back room policy stuff. A terrible president, but Republicans would love working the strings.
I had no idea he was so thoroughly corrupt both in his past deeds, his deeds while campaigning, or his having been thoroughly corrupted by Putin (by Putin's choice or his, is irrelevant at this point).

It's readily apparent that the vast majority of leftists still don't really understand why Trump won.
I guess it's for the better.

Not wanting to stray from the pack, it looks like you too Grandpappy have opted for a complete, irrelevant, and pointless dodge.
 
...was this corrupt.

He's been the same way since the 1980s. All you had to do was open your eyes or do a little research to find out how the guy operates. None of this was a secret. Did you just ignore the truth because you wanted 1 or 2 things?

Or is this all about guaranteeing that the 1st president after the 1st minority president was someone who could be savage to your political opponents?
Leftist democrats have convinced themselves that Trump is evil. The truth is the leftist democrats are false accusers because they are deceived into thinking everything opposed to their deluded leftist democrat agenda is evil.
 
Hahahahahaha........good one!

It's okay to still be in denial. Republican Media is genius in convincing people of lies.

It's up to each voter or not to be gullible. You just haven't figured that out yet. You still don't understand the kind of crook and liar that Donald Trump is. And that's really sad and on you.
 
Leftist democrats have convinced themselves that Trump is evil. The truth is the leftist democrats are false accusers because they are deceived into thinking everything opposed to their deluded leftist democrat agenda is evil.

Donald Trump has been a lying crook since the 1980s. It's none of our fault that you guys haven't figured that out yet.
 
I couldn't be sure about Trump. But I knew Hillary was corrupt to the bone. Along with Pelosi, Reed, and a host of other Democrats who are also corrupt or facing charges. Or in prison. Or out now. Or going back soon. Liberals, you don't hold the moral high ground here, so best not to play the corruption card.
Trump has what, five of his first picks now up on felony charges during his administration and a dozen ongoing investigations or more, evidence of obstruction of justice, etc.?
How many did Obama have? Zero.
Wait, how many for Hillary? Zero.

Historically, by party, whats' that graph look like>

Party_without_Foreign_2.jpg

Red is Republican, blue is Democrat. That's indictments per year, convictions per year, and prison sentence per year.

How does that square with your claim that it's Democrats who are the most criminal party? It's the exact opposite.

UPDATED: Comparing Presidential Administrations by felony arrests and convictions (as of 9/17/2018)
 
Klattu coems in with a dodge as well. Ignores the question and asks a question of his own.
Has Trump been indicted (when everyone knows now a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted)?

That's KLATTU's dodge, sure, but then he appears to set out a standard that *cannot be met*.

Too funny.

Its all they have. So pathetic, but so expected. The cultists can't understand that they are in a cult.
 
...was this corrupt.

He's been the same way since the 1980s. All you had to do was open your eyes or do a little research to find out how the guy operates. None of this was a secret. Did you just ignore the truth because you wanted 1 or 2 things?

Or is this all about guaranteeing that the 1st president after the 1st minority president was someone who could be savage to your political opponents?

Did you ever do a quick, in depth, analysis of his opponent?
 
...was this corrupt.

He's been the same way since the 1980s. All you had to do was open your eyes or do a little research to find out how the guy operates. None of this was a secret. Did you just ignore the truth because you wanted 1 or 2 things?

Or is this all about guaranteeing that the 1st president after the 1st minority president was someone who could be savage to your political opponents?

The corruption is the point, right along with the cruelty.

They spent Obama's years talking themselves into believing that they are endlessly victimized by liberals and that therefore there is nothing wrong with attacking liberals using the worst means possible. Hence, they voted for Trump, the very worst of the worst. Hence they cheer every time a liberal notes the dangers of undoing environmental regulations, when a liberal criticizes separating children while not making efforts to keep them linked up with parents and even denying them soap/toothbrushes for months, or perhaps when a liberal notes the dishonest and craven behavior surrounding stealing Garland's seat.

Make no mistake: they like the corruption specifically because it offends.
 
Klattu coems in with a dodge as well. Ignores the question and asks a question of his own.
Has Trump been indicted (when everyone knows now a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted)?

That's KLATTU's dodge, sure, but then he appears to set out a standard that *cannot be met*.

Too funny.

It's all they know how to do. They can't debate a point properly because they at least sense they're in the wrong, so they act as if for any question they get to make up a standard that must be met for them to be wrong and insist they are not wrong until they tell you otherwise.

Ludicrous, but then, that's the point.
 
And what's the most funny is she's still a thousand times more honest than Donald Trump.

You simply voted for a crook. Not unlike someone in Chicago or Oakland.

Yeah,
You mean the same candidate who got questions to debates in advance
You mean the same candidate whos husband met with the the head of the DOJ on the secret tarmac meeting during her investigation
You mean the same candidate who had the DNC remove Bernie from the election process
You mean the same candidate who had her illegal subpoenaed servers wiped
You mean the same candidate candidate who deleted over 30,000 subpoenaed emails
You mean the same candidate who lied about Benghazi being over an internet video
You mean the same candidate that Comey stated had classified government documents on her personal server

Yeah, shes a real honest candidate. So honest that a TV reality show host beat her.
 
The thread doesn't specify, meaning it applies to the entirety of Trumps behavior, so why are you asking about specific points, and then jumping on the Trump bandwagon by bashing news that isn't working directly with him on Republican messaging?

Because I really would like to know when the latest Watergate scandal is real. I supported Jim Webb last election. I'm fed up with all these media outlets that are a complete disgrace to journalistic ethics and do the American people absolutely no good by crying, "Foul!" every evening. I'm f**king sick of CNN and FOX News and I wish that CBS, NBC, ABC, and PBS actually could report something that speaks to both sides of the American aisle without slanting left all the time. What's the next election? Orange Man vs. Pretend Red Woman?
 
Trump has what, five of his first picks now up on felony charges during his administration and a dozen ongoing investigations or more, evidence of obstruction of justice, etc.?
How many did Obama have? Zero.
Wait, how many for Hillary? Zero.How does that square with your claim that it's Democrats who are the most criminal party? It's the exact opposite.

They're both corrupt. That's the nature of democracy, or government in general. So why you so upset that Trump might be corrupt. You got no moral supremacy. Get off that high horse.
 
Did you ever do a quick, in depth, analysis of his opponent?

They did ignore the elephant in the room. I was no fan of Trump, but Hillary was much worse.

Trump turned out to be good at the job but I cannot claim I expected it.
 
Condor060 just goes straight for the "What about Hillary!?!?!?!"
Good stuff.

Just exposing the obvious hypocritical stance we all enjoy by the left.
 
They're both corrupt. That's the nature of democracy, or government in general. So why you so upset that Trump might be corrupt. You got no moral supremacy. Get off that high horse.

That you appear to agree that Trump is corrupt, and that you don't care about it, is sufficient for me to understand your position. There is nothing to debate there, it's your own tragic belief on display.
Apathy isn't for everyone.
 
...was this corrupt.

He's been the same way since the 1980s. All you had to do was open your eyes or do a little research to find out how the guy operates. None of this was a secret. Did you just ignore the truth because you wanted 1 or 2 things?

Or is this all about guaranteeing that the 1st president after the 1st minority president was someone who could be savage to your political opponents?

The second one
 
Just exposing the obvious hypocritical stance we all enjoy by the left.

Go ahead, indict Hillary.

Open up a dozen investigations.

You got nothing, but you sure are obsessing on it.
 
Klattu coems in with a dodge as well. Ignores the question and asks a question of his own.
Has Trump been indicted (when everyone knows now a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted)?

That's KLATTU's dodge, sure, but then he appears to set out a standard that *cannot be met*.

Too funny.

yeah yeah yeah , I know . He's going to be indicted as soon as he leaves office. Blah blah blah.
 
Back
Top Bottom