• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Whisteblower Related: Will Liberals Refuse To Vote For Biden Due To His Bribery Of Ukraine Prez?

ashurbanipal said:
Back when I was in the corporate world, I noticed something that I came to call the "liar's advantage." The liar's advantage is this: in business, the person willing to lie will usually have the advantage over a scrupulously honest person. Not always--especially if the liar is not skilled--but usually. Similarly, someone who acts like a sociopath will typically have an advantage over those who do not. And fairly soon, everyone recognizes they either have to behave like sociopaths, or get driven out of business.

As I recall, when Obama first won the Presidency and Democrats took both the House and the Senate, there was a meeting of lawmakers (at least one that has been published and not challenged as slander) in which the goal was to plan out how to frustrate the Democrats' agenda at any cost. Mitch McConnell is on record saying that the single biggest goal he had at the time (I think this was 2009) was to ensure that Obama was a one-term President.

You just cannot do those things and expect the other side won't start living by the same rules. And the cost all 'round will be quite great, I fear.
Click to expand...




I agree 100% with your very erudite commentary.

I think that the Republicans' refusal to even listen to President Obama's last Supreme Court nomination embittered many moderate Democrats.

In all fairness, however, I understand that the Democrats had in earlier years also done the same thing to a Republican Court nominee.

I voted for President Trump and would do so again, but I agree with his critics (those who are rational) that he is personally responsible for some of the rancor because of his abrasive personality.



Have nice weekend!
 
Irwin Corey said:
True and false:

The goal is to send tRump back where he came from; true. That the integrity of our candidate doesn't matter; oh so FALSE.
Click to expand...


Thank you for your comments.

I have read many comments from Democrats who say that they WILL vote for any Democratic candidate in order to remove President Trump from the White House.


Your last sentence seems to imply that some scrupulous Democrats may NOT vote for a Democratic candidate that lacks integrity. I assume that such Democrats may in that case just skip the presidential vote or "waste" their vote on a third-party candidate. That would be, indeed, a very classy decision.



Have a nice weekend!
 
TheParser said:
Thank you for your comments.

I have read many comments from Democrats who say that they WILL vote for any Democratic candidate in order to remove President Trump from the White House.


Your last sentence seems to imply that some scrupulous Democrats may NOT vote for a Democratic candidate that lacks integrity. I assume that such Democrats may in that case just skip the presidential vote or "waste" their vote on a third-party candidate. That would be, indeed, a very classy decision.



Have a nice weekend!
Click to expand...

Not a ****ing chance! When it comes to integrity, morals, compassion and basic humanity tRump couldn't stand on him mommies shoulders and kiss the ass of the worst Democrat.<--period

IF every American that can vote, votes tRump CAN'T win.<--period And you can bet your last dollar I will be out volunteering, canvasing and registering voters … AbsaByGodLutely I will. Americans don't deserve to endure another four years of this narcissistic criminal ass hole. Whomever the Democrats nominate to run against tRump will be an easy choice to pick.
 
Last edited:
3leftsdoo said:
Our first answer, and not an unexpected one...

:hm
Click to expand...



And that you can't provide the evidence to back up your own words, not unexpected either. Or maybe you're still doing research. It's only your word that's at stake here, though the thread subject is more in question.
 
lurchadams said:
Don't hold your breath!
Click to expand...



Yup. It's just for the record so as to establish history that can be brought up at a later time, on the same or another thread subject, to make a relevant and most pertinent point in the debate at hand.
 
TheParser said:
I agree 100% with your very erudite commentary.

I think that the Republicans' refusal to even listen to President Obama's last Supreme Court nomination embittered many moderate Democrats.

In all fairness, however, I understand that the Democrats had in earlier years also done the same thing to a Republican Court nominee.

I voted for President Trump and would do so again, but I agree with his critics (those who are rational) that he is personally responsible for some of the rancor because of his abrasive personality.
Click to expand...

Fair, and I agree, however, not to minimize the responsibility of the left for the rancor.

Have nice weekend!
Click to expand...

You as well!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom