• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Christine Blasey Ford's friend now says she's skeptical of Kavanaugh accusation

Damn inconvenient getting old. I've already forgot what the topic was due to that damn train coming down the tracks.

Mr. can you remind me?
 
As long as every last person involved in pushing the 7+ investigations allegedly into how the Benghazi attack unfolded but were merely used to smear Hillary with sloppy handling of an email server, pushed by persons who do not care at all about worse offenses under Trump, goes on. Then we have a deal.

Otherwise, it's just the usual Trumpist pride in hypocrisy.


PS: I know what the reply is going to be before I see it, and I know any person(s) making it will themselves have done worse.

Benghazi?

Yes, Benghazi, the thing you lot couldn't shut up about for more than 0.05 seconds.



:beatdeadhorse

Exactly.

In what way do you think your rejoinders are *gotcha* moves? Yes, exactly, you beat a horse's fossilized bones for a good four years, then turned around and in a display of the most massive hypocrisy in the history of Earth defended things 1,000 times worse your Orange Lout did.

It really is incredibly stupid and self-defeating. You're only 40% of the voting population. Your only hope is that the Dems run someone as unlikeable as Hillary who ALSO ignores the few key swing states he/she needs.




Ah well, at least there will be plenty of opportunities to compare your dishonest whinging about whomever wins in 2020 against what you said under Trump. You'll probably think your responses then are going to be clever rejoinders as well.

But hey, chin up...
 
No, really, if you are concerned about whether pointing out to someone that the creator of an OP cannot whattabout themselves in their own OP is thread-jacking, report it.






Not that this is thread-jacking:



You having nothing to say about sham investigations.





If that bothers you, stop saying so many things that are stupid, dishonest, and hypocrisy.

You are ranting about nothing...
You're dismissed if you don't like the subject of the thread.
It is not about me.
 
Christine Blasey Ford’s friend now says she’s skeptical of Kavanaugh accusation

Good for Leland Keyser for speaking up and setting the record straight. She's confirmed for me that Ford manufactured this story for a political agenda.

She has also clarified that she does not know Kavanaugh.
I'm betting Ford doesn't know him either. ;)

I really hope that Christine Blasey Ford is investigated along with her crooked attorney who actually admitted that the testimony was to stop the nomination because she feared Kavanaugh would overturn Roe v. Wade.

With all the backtracking, lying and lack of proof, everyone should be skeptical. We can't do that, though, because.....politics. :roll:
 
Yes, Benghazi, the thing you lot couldn't shut up about for more than 0.05 seconds.





Exactly.

In what way do you think your rejoinders are *gotcha* moves? Yes, exactly, you beat a horse's fossilized bones for a good four years, then turned around and in a display of the most massive hypocrisy in the history of Earth defended things 1,000 times worse your Orange Lout did.

It really is incredibly stupid and self-defeating. You're only 40% of the voting population. Your only hope is that the Dems run someone as unlikeable as Hillary who ALSO ignores the few key swing states he/she needs.




Ah well, at least there will be plenty of opportunities to compare your dishonest whinging about whomever wins in 2020 against what you said under Trump. You'll probably think your responses then are going to be clever rejoinders as well.

But hey, chin up...

You're dismissed now...
Bullseye was another who wasn't posting to this forum when Benghazi was a hot topic.
 
As long as every last person involved in pushing the 7+ investigations allegedly into how the Benghazi attack unfolded but were merely used to smear Hillary with sloppy handling of an email server, pushed by persons who do not care at all about worse offenses under Trump, goes on. Then we have a deal.
Nevermind the fact that the Obama administration knowingly lied about an attack and actively sought to have an innocent man jailed for a video in order to obscure the fact that it was their own cavalier attitude to security that resulted in multiple deaths.

Yes, thanks for pointing out that Democrats are in the habit of trying to destroy the lives of innocent people if they think there's something to gain politically.
 
Yes, Benghazi, the thing you lot couldn't shut up about for more than 0.05 seconds.





Exactly.

In what way do you think your rejoinders are *gotcha* moves? Yes, exactly, you beat a horse's fossilized bones for a good four years, then turned around and in a display of the most massive hypocrisy in the history of Earth defended things 1,000 times worse your Orange Lout did.[/qupte] Find my last post on Benghazi.

Mr Person said:
It really is incredibly stupid and self-defeating. You're only 40% of the voting population. Your only hope is that the Dems run someone as unlikeable as Hillary who ALSO ignores the few key swing states he/she needs.
LOL, sounds like false bravado to me. Someone as unlikeable as Hillary? Have you seen the Dem lineup? Which one Isn't as unlikable as Hilary? That health care for illegals is a real selling point. :roll:



mr person said:
Ah well, at least there will be plenty of opportunities to compare your dishonest whinging about whomever wins in 2020 against what you said under Trump. You'll probably think your responses then are going to be clever rejoinders as well.

But hey, chin up...
PS: When have I ever said any of my rejoinders were "gotchas"?
 
This thread
ca94d0c44e2987e6ad78f56699f15b0a.gif
 
Nevermind the fact that the Obama administration knowingly lied about an attack and actively sought to have an innocent man jailed for a video in order to obscure the fact that it was their own cavalier attitude to security that resulted in multiple deaths.

Yes, thanks for pointing out that Democrats are in the habit of trying to destroy the lives of innocent people if they think there's something to gain politically.

it is consistent with a political philosophy that sees people individually as nothing more than pawns who can be sacrificed for the greater good.
 
You know... When Kavanaugh lied about why the embassy was over run....

Wait... ;)
Yeah, it was only seven years ago and the lefties still throw it out as the ultimate "whataboutism".
 
Well I don't know if any evidence exists that Kavanaugh sexually abused anyone but I think that picture is proof positive that AProud is abusing me.
 
Yeah, it was only seven years ago and the lefties still throw it out as the ultimate "whataboutism".

He played the Benghazi card on us and we both weren't even posting to this forum seven years ago...:lamo
 
Well I don't know if any evidence exists that Kavanaugh sexually abused anyone but I think that picture is proof positive that AProud is abusing me.

*evil cackle*
 
Christine Blasey Ford’s friend now says she’s skeptical of Kavanaugh accusation

Good for Leland Keyser for speaking up and setting the record straight. She's confirmed for me that Ford manufactured this story for a political agenda.

She has also clarified that she does not know Kavanaugh.
I'm betting Ford doesn't know him either. ;)

I really hope that Christine Blasey Ford is investigated along with her crooked attorney who actually admitted that the testimony was to stop the nomination because she feared Kavanaugh would overturn Roe v. Wade.

Leland Keyser had an addiction/alcohol problem and didn't want to speak publicly, which is understandable. But she didn't seem to have a problem speaking to the book's NYT authors about her friend...

"...Of her friend, she alludes to some kind of “trauma” Ford may have experienced, even as the details of this particular allegation don’t add up to her.

I think something happened, but I don’t know what,” Keyser said. “And I haven’t been close enough to her over the years to know that something went down. I haven’t seen her in a long, long time. I do think that something happened to her, and that maybe she is a victim of some sort of trauma.” ..."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ess-brett-kavanaugh-saga-comes-down-his-side/

Keyser seems to believe her friend, Blasey Ford experienced some sort of trauma....but she doesn't remember how or why. There's enough there to spin for both sides where Ms. Keyser is concerned.

That said, I don't think we're any closer to the truth now than we were during the hearings. The book is proving to be a big nothing burger except to remind people what a sham the hearing and FBI investigation was.
 
Last edited:
Leland Keyser had an addiction/alcohol problem and didn't want to speak publicly, which is understandable. But she didn't seem to have a problem speaking to the book's NYT authors about her friend...

"...Of her friend, she alludes to some kind of “trauma” Ford may have experienced, even as the details of this particular allegation don’t add up to her.

I think something happened, but I don’t know what,” Keyser said. “And I haven’t been close enough to her over the years to know that something went down. I haven’t seen her in a long, long time. I do think that something happened to her, and that maybe she is a victim of some sort of trauma.” ..."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ess-brett-kavanaugh-saga-comes-down-his-side/

Keyser seems to believe her friend, Blasey Ford experienced some sort of trauma....but she doesn't remember how or why. There's enough there to spin for both sides where Ms. Keyser is concerned.

That said, I don't think we're any closer to the truth now than we were during the hearings. The book is proving to be a big nothing burger except to remind people what a sham the hearing and FBI investigation was.

Ford was always an absolute piece of **** for throwing her friend under the bus in front of the nation about her drug problems simply because she didn't testify to help her.
 
Ford was always an absolute piece of **** for throwing her friend under the bus in front of the nation about her drug problems simply because she didn't testify to help her.

Imo, they threw each other under the bus.
 
Imo, they threw each other under the bus.

One privately didn't testify because she said she didn't remember anything, the other passive aggressively came out and said it was great that she was getting treatment for her drug problems.

They aren't even close to the same thing.
 
As long as every last person involved in pushing the 7+ investigations allegedly into how the Benghazi attack unfolded but were merely used to smear Hillary with sloppy handling of an email server, pushed by persons who do not care at all about worse offenses under Trump, goes on. Then we have a deal.

Otherwise, it's just the usual Trumpist pride in hypocrisy.


PS: I know what the reply is going to be before I see it, and I know any person(s) making it will themselves have done worse.

As long as the :rwbdonkey keeps kicking in the faces of Trump supporters those fake Impeachment investigations to smear Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and the Duly Elected 45th POTUS...

The opposition will just need to deal with those supporters providing these kind of threads.

The kind of thread that shows the sloppy handling of the Democratic Representatives using questionable witnesses in order to televise those smears in the public square.

Roseann:)
 
Back
Top Bottom