• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The New York Times Anti-Kavanaugh Bombshell Is Actually a Dud

trixare4kids said:
How would you know?
Click to expand...

Because in damn near every conversation I've had with him in here, his posts become utter nonsense, I walk away (and even mention it most of time) and he comes back with yet more, which I ignore. :lamo
 
SkyFox76 said:
So this person is commenting on what she read on Twitter from someone else who is reading the book?

I have no idea where this will all lead but my personal opinion back during the whole ordeal was that the FBI would have been best to look at the list of people who say they had information but were never contacted. If they were told to ignore certain individuals by anyone including the potus then Kavanaugh will never be in the clear. If they had contacted everyone on that list this wouldn't be coming up now.

I do see Business Insider and Wall Street Journal have picked up the allegations story, so Tues should clear it all up.
Click to expand...

We needed a never-ending investigation into Kavanaugh!

No stone unturned!!

No allegation left behind!!!

In fact, my aunt's sister remembers someone saying 20 years ago that they had a friend who heard from their brother or brother in law that someone they might have seen at a 7-11 may have said that somebody once bought a beer and that they may have known someone who looked a LOT like Kavanaugh!!!!

Bombshell!!!!!!!!

INVESTIGATE!!!!!!!!!
 
3leftsdoo said:
The truth????

You can't handle the truth that Trump is LITERALLY Hitler!!!!

:donkeyfla
Click to expand...

I know, I know... Nazis are all Hilter slurpers! slurp, slurp, slurp...

:donkeyfla:donkeyfla:donkeyfla
 
trouble13 said:
They are trying to persuade casual observers that voting for republicans is voting to put sexual abusers on the bench. This ia ALL about the 2020 election and the fight over the independents.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Well, that and book $ale$...
 
3leftsdoo said:
We needed a never-ending investigation into Kavanaugh!

No stone unturned!!

No allegation left behind!!!

In fact, my aunt's sister remembers someone saying 20 years ago that they had a friend who heard from their brother or brother in law that someone they might have seen at a 7-11 may have said that somebody once bought a beer and that they may have known someone who looked a LOT like Kavanaugh!!!!

Bombshell!!!!!!!!

INVESTIGATE!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

Who needs lawmakers when we need MORE INVESTIGATORS!!!!
:donkeyfla
 
trixare4kids said:
Hemingway isn't giving you her word. She took direct excerpts from the new anti-Kavanaugh book that reveal the biased Time's reporters account.


Mollie on Twitter: "So I’m reading the new anti-Kavanaugh book by shockingly (really) biased reporters at NYT. All claimed anonymous sources are anti-Kavanaugh while all but a tiny few on-record sources are downright effusive. Just interesting how highly they contradict each other."



But you go ahead and believe the Time's lies by omission story instead.
Click to expand...

You know why they believe it? Because political hacks posing as journalists know how to entice the magpies with shiny objects and they hold their attention for the headline and about a paragraph or so, which they fill with wordiness and thruthiness and innuendo which is highly suggestive and works off of their confirmation bias. They know that TDS has addled their brains so badly that they cannot or will not read further, to find that nugget of a buried and dispositive lede.
 
SkyFox76 said:
Because in damn near every conversation I've had with him in here, his posts become utter nonsense, I walk away (and even mention it most of time) and he comes back with yet more, which I ignore. :lamo
Click to expand...

Sure, you do....
 
3leftsdoo said:
We needed a never-ending investigation into Kavanaugh!

No stone unturned!!

No allegation left behind!!!

In fact, my aunt's sister remembers someone saying 20 years ago that they had a friend who heard from their brother or brother in law that someone they might have seen at a 7-11 may have said that somebody once bought a beer and that they may have known someone who looked a LOT like Kavanaugh!!!!

Bombshell!!!!!!!!

INVESTIGATE!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

Your nonsense aside, had the FBI contacted the current people being named then you know what? The simple end to it would be---we in fact interviewed those alleged witnesses back at the time and found nothing. The end. If someone now says did you interview XYZ after they contacted you? FBI---uh no. Then not the end.
 
Once again the NYT engages in Journalism malpractice. The purposely leaving out of exculpatory evidence is all you need to know what their intentions to be. They are getting hammered on social media and there are several articles debunking their hit piece. The NYT like so many have given up their journalism creds for activism.
 
trixare4kids said:
More on Hemingway's comments that she goes into in full detail in the twitter feed linked below.

Mollie on Twitter: "The NYT reporters, it goes without saying, downplay the significance of this and all the other many facts/stories/quotes/details that cast doubt on the unsupported allegations against Kavanaugh."

eta: Among the dozen or so tweets, these two stand out and busts the NY Time's fake narrative.

Mollie
@MZHemingway

The book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event. Seems, I don’t know, significant.

Mollie
@MZHemingway

At least thus far, Ramirez doesn’t accuse Kavanaugh of anything tangible. Same as original New Yorker in which nothing was actually alleged. Just carefully suggested. Yet in NYT today, authors alleged penis thrusting. Curious what basis for charge is. Important to focus on facts.
Click to expand...

It was so nice of The New York Times to put out this article right before the book was due to be released on Tuesday! :2razz:

Plus, Mr. Stier, who runs a nonprofit organization in Washington is getting a bit of publicity for his non-profit organization. :2razz:

Roseann:)
 
vesper said:
Once again the NYT engages in Journalism malpractice. The purposely leaving out of exculpatory evidence is all you need to know what their intentions to be. They are getting hammered on social media and there are several articles debunking their hit piece. The NYT like so many have given up their journalism creds for activism.
Click to expand...

they were forced to pull the story and take the tweet down. They were busted within minutes of the story being fake.
they are no longer a credible news source.

like most news sources they have sacrificed their credibility for politics.
 
CharisRose said:
It was so nice of The New York Times to put out this article right before the book was due to be released on Tuesday! :2razz:

Plus, Mr. Stier, who runs a nonprofit organization in Washington is getting a bit of publicity for his non-profit organization. :2razz:

Roseann:)
Click to expand...

amazing how that works.
 
vesper said:
Once again the NYT engages in Journalism malpractice. The purposely leaving out of exculpatory evidence is all you need to know what their intentions to be. They are getting hammered on social media and there are several articles debunking their hit piece. The NYT like so many have given up their journalism creds for activism.
Click to expand...

I wonder if they keep telling themselves that selling their souls is worth it if Trump loses in 2020. Thing is, even if that happens, they've long-since passed the point of no return in their Faustian deal with Democrats.
 
SkyFox76 said:
Your nonsense aside, had the FBI contacted the current people being named then you know what? The simple end to it would be---we in fact interviewed those alleged witnesses back at the time and found nothing. The end. If someone now says did you interview XYZ after they contacted you? FBI---uh no. Then not the end.
Click to expand...

No end!!!!

It NEVER ends!!!!!

Interview the interviewers!!!!!

Interview the interviewers of the interviewers!!!!!!

My aunt TOTALLY has the dirt!!!!

Why wasn't SHE interviewed multiple times???

And what about Justin Bieber?!?!?!?!?
 
Still nothing on Fox News. Not even a peep from Breitbarf.
 
ludin said:
they were forced to pull the story and take the tweet down. They were busted within minutes of the story being fake.
they are no longer a credible news source.

like most news sources they have sacrificed their credibility for politics.
Click to expand...

I know they pulled an offensive tweet that described the actions of Kavanaugh "harmless fun" but if they pulled the actual story it's odd WSJ and BI just picked it up earlier today.
 
I gotta say... This is a brilliant marketing to sell the book. :lamo
 
trixare4kids said:
Yep, all political theater.
Maybe to take our minds off of McCabe, and Durham's impending report?
Click to expand...

Biden can't keep his teeth under control
McCabe's going down in flames
Russiagate doesn't work anymore

Gotta come up with a shiny object STAT to divert the ADHD-plagued populace's attention.
 
calamity said:
Yes, people who read the NYT should defend the nation from imbeciles. I agree.
Click to expand...

Nah, they just take turns as pivotman in the lib circle jerk.
 
trixare4kids said:
I know, I know... Nazis are all Hilter slurpers! slurp, slurp, slurp...

:donkeyfla:donkeyfla:donkeyfla
Click to expand...

Can't be a hitler without that stupid looking toothbrush mustache on your face! Combined with that rather ugly hairdo! Both hitler trademarks symbols.

Roseann:)
 
There's lots of Trumpy circle jerk going on in this thread. Panic mode.

Why did the FBI not investigate and who gave the order not to do so?
 
SkyFox76 said:
Your nonsense aside, had the FBI contacted the current people being named then you know what? The simple end to it would be---we in fact interviewed those alleged witnesses back at the time and found nothing. The end. If someone now says did you interview XYZ after they contacted you? FBI---uh no. Then not the end.
Click to expand...

How do you know the F.B.I. didn't interview the people who are currently in the News and written about in a book due to be released for sale on Tuesday?

Got any proof they were never interviewed by the F.B.I.?

Roseann:)
 
Mr Person said:
Poster who always insults liberals using every label imaginable......complains about a label.

When is the news at?
Click to expand...

It was a liberal who used the "Trump-slurper" epithet, you just got it back.

MSNBC is at.......OH! sorry, that's not news, it's smear propaganda.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom