• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Women aren't the problem. LEFTWING women are.

Most children would have been far better off if they had been raised by reliable Christian parents.

So ones that did not lie on a regular basis?
 
My male cousin got the shock of his life when he came home one day to discover his wife of 6 years had left him and the children for another woman. Women can be abusive and evil also.
Being who she is doesn't make her evil. It makes her honest.

His wife was always lesbian or bi, and she likely got tired of denying who she was and trying to act like a heterosexual and being miserable for it. Who do you want to blame this on? Maybe instead of blaming others, you should stop trying to force LGBT people into the closet and shaming them for being LGBT. Do what Jesus would do and love others instead of cherry-picking one passage of Leviticus and ignoring the others.
 
Publishing names is the first best way to make sure people hide from public health officials. You clearly do not care about the public health. How Jesus-y of you.

I was thinking of the poor homosexuals who will never be told that their prospective new partner is infectious with a deadly communicable disease.
 
I was thinking of the poor homosexuals who will never be told that their prospective new partner is infectious with a deadly communicable disease.

Good intentions line the path to hell, et cetera. Your idea is a violation of people's privacy, and a big encouragement not to get proper testing and treatment. Also, I doubt your sincerity about your motives.
 
I was thinking of the poor homosexuals who will never be told that their prospective new partner is infectious with a deadly communicable disease.

Didn't you previously claim that that AIDS was revenge from God because they were gay and promiscuous?
 
Being who she is doesn't make her evil. It makes her honest.

His wife was always lesbian or bi, and she likely got tired of denying who she was and trying to act like a heterosexual and being miserable for it. Who do you want to blame this on? Maybe instead of blaming others, you should stop trying to force LGBT people into the closet and shaming them for being LGBT. Do what Jesus would do and love others instead of cherry-picking one passage of Leviticus and ignoring the others.

How do you know what his wife "always was?" :roll:
 
How do you know what his wife "always was?" : roll:

People are born LGBT. You aren't born hetero and then suddenly change 20 years later. She had been denying the fact that she was Bi or lesbian because of either her family or social views that treat LGBT as less than equal.
 
I was thinking of the poor homosexuals who will never be told that their prospective new partner is infectious with a deadly communicable disease.

And the best way to make them hide is to do what you suggest.

For example. TB has been a US public health issue decades (centuries, really). From a public health standpoint it can be tricky with immigrants (legal and otherwise). If they know their name will be on a list and they fear deportation or legal issues...they go in hiding and they end up trying folk remedies or getting meds from family (splitting doses) If they fear being "found out" it is a public health danger for the rest of us....SO public health officials do their best to assure they can get their drugs and stay out of the eye of the authorities.

The best way is to put the money into research and education. Search for best practices for prevention. Develop treatment regimes.

Making people fear the very people who should want to help is dumb.

Your way is more to punish the individuals rather than protect the rest of us.
 
I'm fine with a woman as president, as long as it's a strong conservative woman, and there aren't quite enough of them to suit me.


Okay, put forth a strong conservative woman candidate. In other words, name someone. Please and thanks.
 
Science does not recommend quarantine? Just let those infected with AIDS run wild spreading the disease like fire without alerting the general public who is dangerously infected?

Do you know what AIDS is?
 
I'm not opposing women pilots. I'm just saying my brother in law said female pilots on average were not as skilled as male pilots in the Navy.

Are you two very similar?
 
You make a good point. If women earn greater profits for the company they work for they should be given appropriate compensation if possible, but the government is wrong if it interferes in most businesses to decide what those rates of compensation should be, if any.

It's not wrong if the businesses are illegally discriminating against women.
 
Good intentions line the path to hell, et cetera. Your idea is a violation of people's privacy, and a big encouragement not to get proper testing and treatment. Also, I doubt your sincerity about your motives.

I don't care. Let those with AIDS continue to be anonymous and let the infect as many unsuspecting homosexuals as they like. Life has risks. That is similar to the risks Americans must face for allowing gun owners the right to own guns.
 
Didn't you previously claim that that AIDS was revenge from God because they were gay and promiscuous?

No, not me. God warns sinners of the harm sin brings. He does not bring the harm in judgment for sin so much as sin brings its own harm.
 
And the best way to make them hide is to do what you suggest.

For example. TB has been a US public health issue decades (centuries, really). From a public health standpoint it can be tricky with immigrants (legal and otherwise). If they know their name will be on a list and they fear deportation or legal issues...they go in hiding and they end up trying folk remedies or getting meds from family (splitting doses) If they fear being "found out" it is a public health danger for the rest of us....SO public health officials do their best to assure they can get their drugs and stay out of the eye of the authorities.

The best way is to put the money into research and education. Search for best practices for prevention. Develop treatment regimes.

Making people fear the very people who should want to help is dumb.

Your way is more to punish the individuals rather than protect the rest of us.

We can either alert the general public as to who is infected with the deadly disease so potential victims will be able to protect themselves, or we can just let them take risks. I really don't care how the world tries to solve its problems. I am at no risk of getting the disease through homosexual behavior.
 
It's not wrong if the businesses are illegally discriminating against women.

A communist government can set the standards as it pleases so as to force businesses to submit to bad policies which do bad things to businesses and the whole economy. They may mean well but Marxists never create vibrant economies, they wreck them instead.
 
We can either alert the general public as to who is infected with the deadly disease so potential victims will be able to protect themselves, or we can just let them take risks. I really don't care how the world tries to solve its problems. I am at no risk of getting the disease through homosexual behavior.

That is what they thought during Reagan's tenure. The Moral Majority (remember those idiots)was just fine with gay people dropping like flies. Well the Moral Majority got the wake up.....many gay people were volunteer blood donors. Lots of them. Married men (that were living a fake life with their female wives)were bringing it home. Etc.

It OF COURSE was going to pass into the general population. If they listened to science ….they could have stopped millions from dying. Pro-life my ass.

Your POV clearly shows why government and religion do not mix. It emphatically shows how some disregard science to the determent of millions.
 
Citizen Trump vs President Trump.

We were talking about President Trump and what he has done for or to women. What has he done as president to women?

The recent reporting of new totally unsubstantiated allegations against Kavenaugh by the New York Times lends credence that there are women who will lie to destroy a political opponent and news organizations who will aid and abet. Doubt is the new first inclination when the the NYTIMES reports or a woman alleges.......that is not Trump's fault.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

Does what he did before becoming 'president' make him any less of a creepy pervert, or do you think he had a Damascene conversion the day he took office and suddenly learned what 'respect' and 'civility' means?
 
Does what he did before becoming 'president' make him any less of a creepy pervert, or do you think he had a Damascene conversion the day he took office and suddenly learned what 'respect' and 'civility' means?

Well perversion aside...it sure did allow him to lie on a much grander scale.
 
I don't care. Let those with AIDS continue to be anonymous and let the infect as many unsuspecting homosexuals as they like. Life has risks. That is similar to the risks Americans must face for allowing gun owners the right to own guns.

That's an interesting comparison for you to make, considering you're advocating for a massive public list of people with AIDS. You a fan of putting yellow stars on gun owners too now, or were you just spouting out whatever came to mind without thinking it through?
 
A communist government can set the standards as it pleases so as to force businesses to submit to bad policies which do bad things to businesses and the whole economy. They may mean well but Marxists never create vibrant economies, they wreck them instead.

We already have a ton of labor laws. Equal pay for women would be one among many. You think we live under a communist government now? And you're still using that word and Marxism interchangeably. How do you post for days over 122 pages and still never bother to look up what you're talking about?
 
That's an interesting comparison for you to make, considering you're advocating for a massive public list of people with AIDS. You a fan of putting yellow stars on gun owners too now, or were you just spouting out whatever came to mind without thinking it through?

I'm OK with letting people with AIDS remain anonymous and people with guns anonymous
and letting Americans just live with risks.
 
We already have a ton of labor laws. Equal pay for women would be one among many. You think we live under a communist government now? And you're still using that word and Marxism interchangeably. How do you post for days over 122 pages and still never bother to look up what you're talking about?

I believe we should simply compensate Labor on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. That will solve simple poverty and increase market participation and engender that positive multiplier effect upon our economy.

Employers should prefer motovated Labor to Labor that Has to "work or die" due to the right wing's insistence on an obsolete work ethic from the more Malthusian, Age of Iron.
 
How does God's foreknowledge influence any of our choices? How does this foreknowledge take away our free will?

two reasons. Foreknowledge makes any choices 'predetermined', and yhou don't have the ability to chose anything but what you are going to. Next, there is the claim that God is also the creator. So, you have a creator that knows exactly what his creation will do , even before that is created. That makes Free Will incompatible with the foreknowledge of an all knowing, all powerful creator. That is the stance known as Incompatibilism
 
two reasons. Foreknowledge makes any choices 'predetermined', and yhou don't have the ability to chose anything but what you are going to. Next, there is the claim that God is also the creator. So, you have a creator that knows exactly what his creation will do , even before that is created. That makes Free Will incompatible with the foreknowledge of an all knowing, all powerful creator. That is the stance known as Incompatibilism

I don't think that foreknowledge equals predetermined.
 
Back
Top Bottom