• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Women aren't the problem. LEFTWING women are.

SDET said:
Equality is essentially impossible to achieve. Consider even discreet mathematics: If there's a number line from 0 to 100. Only one percent of such a number line would fall on the number 50. Consider engineering. Imagine the difficulty get a vehicle engine that operates at EXACTLY 150 degrees Fahrenheit.

The only "equality" I see being pursued by feminists is "getting even". I can just imagine a hundred years ago a feminist telling a man tired after spending all day in a coal mine, fighting back the effects of Black Lung disease about his "white male privilege".
Click to expand...

What a pile of rubbish, and typical right-wing, 'wifey stays at home and does what she is told' reactionary crap. I bet you hated it when women were actually allowed to *gasp*, vote a hundred years ago. Have you any idea at all what men's mindsets were like then? Women, apparently, didn't have the intellectual capacity to make informed decisions, and there was a huge, male, backlash against emancipation and women's suffrage, which some women died to achieve. Sadly it appears there are still men retarded enough to believe it is still 1919, or wish it were.
 
Lisa said:
The fact that we have a Supreme Court to make constitutional interpretations and the amendment process to address issues not deemed worthy of mention in 1790 are proof that it must be a living document if it is to be the relevant basis of our government as a modern society 220 years later. The Constitution would have been rendered irrelevant by the Civil War if it were otherwise.
Click to expand...
The constitution is being made irrelevant by those who demand judges who would bypass the ammendment process and make law by decree.



Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 
Eriech said:
Trump is making the lives of left wing women better despite themselves.

Income of families of unmarried women up nearly 6%. % of those families in poverty down nearly 2%. 2018 over 2017 1.6 million new jobs for women

MAGA

Trump’s A Misogynistic White Supremacist? Then Explain These Results – Issues & Insights

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

That's fantastic news, but what a tone deaf talking point. Women's wages are up, so they should ignore all the despicable things that Trump does and vote for him. Black unemployment is down, so they should ignore all the despicable things that Trump does and vote for him. The good economy is his biggest asset, but you guys have missed the mark so hard that you think it erases all of the sexist, misogynistic, racist things Trump says and does.
 
Scarab said:
That's fantastic news, but what a tone deaf talking point. Women's wages are up, so they should ignore all the despicable things that Trump does and vote for him. Black unemployment is down, so they should ignore all the despicable things that Trump does and vote for him. The good economy is his biggest asset, but you guys have missed the mark so hard that you think it erases all of the sexist, misogynistic, racist things Trump says and does.
Click to expand...
So you prefer style over substance?
3ac47e5a5066364dd0377527c18248c3.jpg


Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 
Eriech said:
So you prefer style over substance?
3ac47e5a5066364dd0377527c18248c3.jpg


Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

No, I prefer substance with style. Trump's "style" is making women's lives conspiculously worse in many ways. Many women's lives are better because their employment situations have improved. I can admit both things. Why can't you?
 
Scarab said:
No, I prefer substance with style. Trump's "style" is making women's lives conspiculously worse in many ways. Many women's lives are better because their employment situations have improved. I can admit both things. Why can't you?
Click to expand...
How has his style made woman's lives worse?

Trump's style works and is producing results. Bush's style was presidential but did not work against an adversarial media.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 
Eriech said:
How has his style made woman's lives worse?

Trump's style works and is producing results. Bush's style was presidential but did not work against an adversarial media.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

It's just my opinion, but his manner of objectifying women, disrespecting his marriages and families, paying off porn stars, publicly denigrating women, and attacking abortion rights, among other things, are like a spill on upholstery. Some of it stays on the surface and can be removed. Some of it seeps into the material and starts rotting the structure from the inside out.
 
marke said:
Some people know practically nothing about the horror of GRID disease.
Click to expand...

So way back when AIDS was know as GRID. We (political/government/medical/research communities) had great potential to grind the spread to a manageable amount.

Why did we not get the help we needed? President Reagan (yeah, I voted for him) paired up with the so called "Moral Majority" (would be Christian Coalition/Christian Conservatives) and they pressured him politically not to give the medical/research/government, etc what they needed to make a difference.

As a fiscal conservative he should have realized that stopping the spread of a deadly disease in early days was financially a much better idea that dealing with it on grand scale almost 40 years later.

But the only thing his "Moral Majority" could see was that the only good gay person was a dead gay person. How Jesus-y of them.

I know from the front line the horrors of GRID/AIDS.

But the idiots did not pay attention and open the purse strings until it was way to late. It took a child with the disease to make many Christians take notice.

AIDS is the perfect example of why religion should stay the hell away from politics and science.
 
Scarab said:
It's just my opinion, but his manner of objectifying women, disrespecting his marriages and families, paying off porn stars, publicly denigrating women, and attacking abortion rights, among other things, are like a spill on upholstery. Some of it stays on the surface and can be removed. Some of it seeps into the material and starts rotting the structure from the inside out.
Click to expand...

How has he attacked abortion "rights"? How has he objectified women? Were you equally concerned about how Sarah Sanders was treated? Susan Collins? Sarah Palin? Seems to me women were particularly ugly toward these women.

Women have fought for decades to get off the pedestal; you finally have a president who treats women equally.



Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 
Mashmont said:
Oh, I'm fine with the insults. It comes with speaking the truth and doing what is right. All one needs to is look at President Trump and all the arrows he takes for standing up to the Marxists.
Click to expand...

Man, a religious person with a crucifixion complex, who'da thunk it. You are comedy gold.
 
Eriech said:
The constitution is being made irrelevant by those who demand judges who would bypass the amendment process and make law by decree.



Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

What rulings are you referring to?

Any constitution interpretation by the Supreme Court is going to make law by its very decision. Do you want to hamstring the government and a demand an amendment in place of every Supreme Court ruling? That would amount to 15+ amendments a year. If you do that then what tripartite role does the US Supreme Court serve as a check and balance to the legislate and executive?
 
Eriech said:
So you prefer style over substance?
3ac47e5a5066364dd0377527c18248c3.jpg


Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Scarab said:
The strongest, fastest man is probably stronger and faster than the strongest, fastest woman, but gender does not determine capability. A lot of it has to do with the way a culture raises girls and boys. American boys are generally encouraged to exercise, race, play sports, and be more physically active than American girls are. Many girls and women are stronger and faster than many boys and men and just as or more capable of doing things that men ordinarily do.
Click to expand...

My brother on law was a Navy pilot in the 1990s. He knew Kara Hultgren. He said she did not score as well in flight training as did most of the men but the Navy advanced her anyway due to political pressure to showcase women fighter pilots. Kara lost her life trying to land on a carrier.
 
Mashmont said:
Someday you leftist atheists will understand immoral acts by one or two adversely affect the whole of society. No man is an island, as they say.
Click to expand...

Hmm, didn't I just read you crying over your bible that people were calling you names?
Theist heal thyself.
 
Mashmont said:
First, how do you define "journalist"? MW defines it as someone who prepares news to be disseminated. Who disseminates news to a large audience than Rush?

Secondly, what does the fact that he's a college dropout have to do with his enormous accomplishments. Bill Gates was also a college dropout.
Click to expand...

Any of the three major networks.
 
Mashmont said:
Someday you leftist atheists will understand immoral acts by one or two adversely affect the whole of society. No man is an island, as they say.
Click to expand...

How are you or anyone else negatively affected because I refuse to live my life by your book of ancient myths and misogyny or that of anyone else? How can we have both secular and religious freedoms if we are required to live by your book of myths? Can people of other religions force you to live by their myths because Jefferson and James Madison were adamant that all religious beliefs and infidels enjoyed the protection of the US Constitution?

As to the invocation of Jefferson, we know that when he and James Madison first proposed the Virginia Statute on Religious Freedom (the frame and basis of the later First Amendment to the Constitution) in 1779, the preamble began, “Well aware that Almighty God hath created the mind free.” Patrick Henry and other devout Christians attempted to substitute the words “Jesus Christ” for “Almighty God” in this opening passage and were overwhelmingly voted down. This vote was interpreted by Jefferson to mean that Virginia’s representatives wanted the law “to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahomedan, the Hindoo, and Infidel of every denomination.”
Click to expand...
 
Eriech said:
How has he attacked abortion "rights"? How has he objectified women? Were you equally concerned about how Sarah Sanders was treated? Susan Collins? Sarah Palin? Seems to me women were particularly ugly toward these women.

Women have fought for decades to get off the pedestal; you finally have a president who treats women equally.



Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

He talks openly about being "pro-life" (all of a sudden) and uses abortion rights as a litmus test for judicial appointments. How has he not objectified women? From ogling women to touching them without permission to calling them childish names and talking about their physical appearances inappropriately, the man is clearly a product of the 1950s. You did a clumsy and irrelevant switch from perpetrator to victims, but I don't like to see any person subjected to gender discrimination regardless of their political party.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom