• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Women aren't the problem. LEFTWING women are.

Oh you naughty leftwing woman you! And you're one of those gheys that upset him, too. He wants to be in your bedroom with you and your GF monitoring your sexual activity. He probably brings along a midget to partake.

I'm getting back together with my girlfriend this weekend, so I'll definitely be offending him with my ungodly sexual acts.
 
Pedophilia is not homosexuality. Learn the difference.

Male molesters of boys, which is what over 80% of the accused priests were, are by definition, GAY.

So I just think you people should own your homophobia.
 
For those who don't know, americanwoman is referring to a case in which a boy who was a child himself at the time, on one occasion touched his sister through her clothes while she slept, and she didn't even know it, and said she certainly wasn't harmed by it. Now he is in his 30s, there have been no such occurrences since, but americanwoman thinks he should have faced the same charges as Jeffrey Epstein. And sole reason she thinks it is because the man is a conservative.

No, I don't think he should face the same charges as Epstein you liar.

If you can't defend your perverted pro-incest stances without lying, you fail.
 
Male molesters of boys, which is what over 80% of the accused priests were, are by definition, GAY.

So I just think you people should own your homophobia.

80% of priests were Male molesters of boys?

Yeah I believe it
 
Male molesters of boys, which is what over 80% of the accused priests were, are by definition, GAY.

So I just think you people should own your homophobia.

No, they are not. Paedophilia is an unnatural attraction to pre-pubescent children of whichever gender, and by either adult gender. That's another thing you are ignorant of. Did you know there are paedophile women also? No, of course you didn't. By definition, you couldn't be more wrong on this subject if you tried.

Female paedophiles: Why women sexually abuse children - Telegraph
 
No, they are not. Paedophilia is an unnatural attraction to pre-pubescent children of whichever gender. That's another thing you are ignorant of. Did you know there are paedophile women also? No, of course you didn't. By definition, you couldn't be more wrong on this subject if you tried.

But he will try. Lol
 
No, I don't think he should face the same charges as Epstein you liar.

If you can't defend your perverted pro-incest stances without lying, you fail.

He's been a failure, even since he started defending molestation against women.
 
He's mad us "lefty" women speak our mind. How tragic.

Woman, get back in the kitchen and stop spreading Marxism! The great journalist Rush Limbaugh is offended!
 
It is very easy to recognize that Limbaugh is no journalist.

Wrong. Limbaugh reviews and discusses politics from his own perspective. That makes him a commentator, not a journalist. Every journalist who ever lived (and even fictional ones) is/was a better journalist than Limbaugh could ever dream to be.
Let's look at it objectively.

Contra "journalist": He's chiefly and above all things an entertainer, a pundit, and a commentator; this much is undeniable. If we consider "journalist" and "entertainer/pundit" to be mutually exclusive professions, he clearly falls more into the latter category. His show is nearly 100% editorial. He does minimal investigative work personally. Finally, to the best of my knowledge, he doesn't regard himself as a journalist.

Pro "journalist": He has a research staff and (believe it or not) a fact-checking staff for at least some journalistic research. He's been the instigator of numerous "call out" stories (which I loosely define as a high-profile individual drawing attention to a comment or tweet that otherwise largely escaped public notice). [Like it or not, "call out" stories are a central part of journalism circa 2019. The pages of major newspapers are full of them.] He does on-air Q&A interviews with ideologues and legislators, which is sine qua non journalism. Finally, the format of his show is undeniably similar to that of many other pundits who do consider themselves journalists.

As I said earlier, I regard "entertainer/pundit/commentator vs. journalist" to be a spectrum in the 21st Century. When we consider the sum of the above facts, it seems to me we can reasonably place Mr. Limbaugh at (5-15% journalist, 85-95% entertainer/pundit/commentator) on the spectrum. I personally wouldn't regard anything short of 50% as a "journalist", but I can also think of big names in US news not far from this same point on the spectrum who are widely regarded as journalists (@Mashmont provides a few names).

Something else to consider: political cartoonists, whose work consists entirely of satirical cartoons and short editorials, are considered journalists and are even subject to receiving major journalistic awards such as Pulitzer Prizes.
 
Male molesters of boys, which is what over 80% of the accused priests were, are by definition, GAY.

So I just think you people should own your homophobia.

Well, no. Orientation refers to lifelong attraction by gender. Pedophilia refers to attraction by age. The vast majority of people who molest children are pedophiles. Gender is irrelevant to them.
 
No, they are not. Paedophilia is an unnatural attraction to pre-pubescent children of whichever gender. That's another thing you are ignorant of. Did you know there are paedophile women also? No, of course you didn't. By definition, you couldn't be more wrong on this subject if you tried.

Even NAMBLA admits they are an organization of gay men

"The only humane and logical step would be to abolish the concept of a minimum age altogether for homosexuals of both sexes and to rely instead on the laws dealing with common assault where there is evidence that a sexual act was not consensual

Boys Speak Out on Man/Boy Love
 
Well, no. Orientation refers to lifelong attraction by gender. Pedophilia refers to attraction by age. The vast majority of people who molest children are pedophiles. Gender is irrelevant to them.

I already pointed this out. Silence was the reply.
 
For those who don't know, americanwoman is referring to a case in which a boy who was a child himself at the time, on one occasion touched his sister through her clothes while she slept, and she didn't even know it, and said she certainly wasn't harmed by it. Now he is in his 30s, there have been no such occurrences since, but americanwoman thinks he should have faced the same charges as Jeffrey Epstein. And sole reason she thinks it is because the man is a conservative.

If you're talking about that pervert Josh Duggar, he touched 3 of his sisters more than once, and someone else too whose name was never made public. Now that he's in his 30s, he was working for the "Family Values Council" pretending to be a family values person, while concurrently cheating on his wife through his two Ashley Madison accounts, and surfing the internet constantly to feed his porn addiction.

Do you have a quota for lies and failure? I hope you've almost reached it.
 
Well, no. Orientation refers to lifelong attraction by gender. Pedophilia refers to attraction by age. The vast majority of people who molest children are pedophiles. Gender is irrelevant to them.

If this were true, then why were 80% of the priest victims boys ?
 
Even NAMBLA admits they are an organization of gay men

"The only humane and logical step would be to abolish the concept of a minimum age altogether for homosexuals of both sexes and to rely instead on the laws dealing with common assault where there is evidence that a sexual act was not consensual

Boys Speak Out on Man/Boy Love

Well, if NAMBLA says it, it must be true!

Good lord, please think before you post...
 
Even NAMBLA admits they are an organization of gay men

"The only humane and logical step would be to abolish the concept of a minimum age altogether for homosexuals of both sexes and to rely instead on the laws dealing with common assault where there is evidence that a sexual act was not consensual

Boys Speak Out on Man/Boy Love

Do you understand the meaning of 'pre-pubescent'? When you have looked it up explain how that relates to homosexuality please. Your pathetically irrelevant link concerns gay teenagers.
 
Back
Top Bottom