• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rachel Maddow, Head Cheerleader of Liberal Conspiracy Theories, Sued For 10 Million Big Ones

BWG said:
You posted this "plaintiff claimed that counsel for NBC Universal said ".

Later you stated "Oxford and Stanford and Rhodes Scholar needs a lawyer to interpret what she had said".

Where did you get that NBC Universal's lawyer was also hers?

You do know that they are suing Maddow, Comcast Corporation, NBC Universal and MSNBC

From your own link:

"...attorneys for OANN’s owner Herrring Networks, Inc. said they filed a $10 million defamation lawsuit against Maddow, Comcast Corporation, NBC Universal and MSNBC in a California federal court."
Click to expand...


Everything I quoted is in that link.
 
3leftsdoo said:
Attention to detail...

The agreement was for a signature change (or in your case, adoption) not a screen name change. In lieu of that, we could also agree that the one who is wrong make a $100 donation to the forum. :)

Madcow will be apologizing/paying up. :) Nothing's been ginned up; she went too far in her paranoid Jonesian/McCarthyist false-outrage spewings.
Click to expand...


I will certainly concede that she often beats the drum too hard.

And I’m annoyed that she uses the entire A block of every show building up a story that I already know about, particularly when that buildup includes rehashes of recent and not so recent history that I already know about it.
 
BWG said:
You posted this "plaintiff claimed that counsel for NBC Universal said ".

Later you stated "Oxford and Stanford and Rhodes Scholar needs a lawyer to interpret what she had said".

Where did you get that NBC Universal's lawyer was also hers?

You do know that they are suing Maddow, Comcast Corporation, NBC Universal and MSNBC

From your own link:

"...attorneys for OANN’s owner Herrring Networks, Inc. said they filed a $10 million defamation lawsuit against Maddow, Comcast Corporation, NBC Universal and MSNBC in a California federal court."
Click to expand...

Don’t confuse them with their own facts!!!!
 
Lord of Planar said:
That type of correlation has no relevance. It would cause someone to speculate there may be deeper connections, but to go beyond that without proof, is slander, and actionable in the justice system.

Mad-cow better be ready to provide proof, or pay for her evil lies.
Click to expand...

Pretty much.

The whole "literally wasn't meant literally" argument kinda cooks her goose.

Or cow...
 
nota bene said:
Oh, that's easy, and toss in "maturity" too: Brit Hume, Chris Wallace, Bret Baier, Catherine Herridge, Neal Cavuto, Laura Ingraham, Gregg Jarrett, Kimberley Strassell....
Click to expand...

It's weird - while Fox DOES go off the rails, it's generally more sane, if highly biased.

Ingraham is particularly disliked by liberals, but like Carlson, she's pretty level-headed.

Practical, if overheated by the perceived Democrat-Socialist menace...
 
Lisa said:
OANN has a problem with public definition of character. They'll get over it.
Click to expand...

That could be a problem which might limit damages, but RM went too far, and will be chastised.

Self-induced if they settle; cue up the apology...
 
iguanaman said:
Refuse to accept material from a source that has written over 1000 propaganda pieces paid for by the Kremlin. That's what. Free speech does not mean our media needs to taken over by a hostile power.
Click to expand...

Yeah...

...no.
 
iguanaman said:
And you like it just like I said. You like that he has annexed Venezuela and that Ukraine is next and so does Comrade Trump.
Click to expand...

Nope. Annexed? :roll: Thats some serious nonsense, komrade.
 
3leftsdoo said:
More than likely it will be settled and Madcow will deliver an on-air apology with non-disclosures all around.

They've probably been negotiating for a couple of months, so this was the next step to force a settlement/apology.

But the real story here?

Madcow being held accountable for her insane/outrageous conduct spells the beginning of the end for the current urea journalism of hysterical liberal outrage.

:)
Click to expand...

Why should she apologise for repeating something already in the public domain?
 
3leftsdoo said:
Could be Ratchet will prevail, but the case won't be thrown out.

The Madcow may survive to moo & spew another day!
Click to expand...
Are you kidding? This kind of stuff boosts her celebrity and ratings. OAN is doing her a favor.
 
Lord of Planar said:
Your link points to other links. Not proof.
Click to expand...

That link points to articles written by Russian national Kristian Rouz on Sputnik International, the official news agency of the Russian government. Who also happens to write for OAN.
 
RaleBulgarian said:
Are you kidding? This kind of stuff boosts her celebrity and ratings. OAN is doing her a favor.
Click to expand...

I watched a few minutes of Rachel last night because of this article. I'd watch her just for her subtle sarcasm.
 
lwf said:
That link points to articles written by Russian national Kristian Rouz on Sputnik International, the official news agency of the Russian government. Who also happens to write for OAN.
Click to expand...

Why does anyone reasonable consider that proof?
 
Lord of Planar said:
Why does anyone reasonable consider that proof?
Click to expand...

Because a Russian journalist who is paid by the Russian government to write pro-Putin propaganda is also being paid by OAN to write pro-Putin propaganda in an American publication. Which is what Maddow accused OAN of doing.
 
lwf said:
Because a Russian journalist who is paid by the Russian government to write pro-Putin propaganda is also being paid by OAN to write pro-Putin propaganda in an American publication. Which is what Maddow accused OAN of doing.
Click to expand...

Your allegation is not proof.
 
jnug said:
If you are going to pay a journalist and publish pieces from a journalist that is also on "Sputniks" payroll, expect to get called out for it.

Stand in the rain, gonna' get wet. Lawsuit is frivolous. Going nowhere.
Click to expand...

With slander?

OK...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom