- Joined
- Dec 12, 2016
- Messages
- 35,031
- Reaction score
- 14,498
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Yes, a prison. A prison for people who committed the crime of not having homes.
And Trump loves debt. We could bring back debtors prison for him.
Yes, a prison. A prison for people who committed the crime of not having homes.
Yes, many of them. But why does that matter in the context of my comment, specifically?
What a pitiful post.There are a lot of problems we can hand over to the federal government. I am glad to see all the so-called conservatives and libertarians finally agree on that. Now, lets add
Medicare for all
Guaranteed income
Free food
Free college
Gun bans
Limits of profiteering
Eliminate bad parenting, bad churching, bad feeding, bad bad bad....let's have uncle Sam eliminate all bad things. :roll:
Yeay! Trump is great!
:lamo
There is nothing new here...you **** yourself over all things Trump. In this case you have a STATE that has epidemic health conditions, disease, drug use, violent crimes, deaths, rat infestations, all caused by a homeless epidemic that the state cant begin to touch...and when the Trump administration LOOKS at an unused FAA facility as a possible solution...
you **** yourself on cue.
You would rather have the homeless epidemic...the **** on the streets, the rats, the drug needles, the disease, the rapes...CONTINUE than accept the possibility of the fed working with the state to find a solution to a massive problem. And you have one reason. Your constant mindless hatred of Trump.
You've never heard of Staten Island I suppose.
What? The ones I'm talking about don't involve either.That isn't permissible if there is a cost, they are required to work or of religious belief is involved.
You have zero concept of states' rights and small government ideology. You talk loony clichés. As usual, you seem more interest in spewing anti-Trump BS than actually offering anything meaningful about dealing with this serious problem.
I've seen stories about some private agencies running short term camps for homeless, offering medical, dental, mental assistance, showers, haircuts, etc.
It was a general comment. Here's one I've been involved in in the pastPrivate is not the federal government. And you gave no specifics or links. Its just never is going to have the same meaning as a federal facility for the homeless.
Pure nonsense.Ah yes, giant federal camps filled with a state’s homeless people is not big government, and it’s totally respectful of that state’s right to self-govern :roll:
Maybe figuring out what Staten Island is might be a more worthwhile endeavor, because judging by the lack of logic in the above post, making sound arguments certainly is not.
I like the idea of providing shelter for the homeless, provided its not "mandatory shelter".....I know there are enough shipping containers that could be used.
They work nicely for us over here...and, as shelters go, pretty damn durable.
View attachment 67263709
View attachment 67263710
It's been kind of a fad over here to build container homes.
That lower pic is neat. Stacked housing with mini-split cooling. So long as you insulate the hell out of them it's a good idea.
Yup....I have seen a lot of those popping up; fairly cost effective ( compared to other pre-fab shelter/homes) , easily moved, easy to perform maintenance on as the piping/wiring is usually external in protected covers/channels, and they have a minimal foot print that allows them to be placed in locations with minimal prep.
Thats great for veterans that there is a NGO that at least does something. But that does not really relate to a federal facility housing Americans at the cost of tax payers. Cities that have homeless problems are responsible, not the federal government. What constitutional right does the federal government have to come into a State and set up a facility for the homeless? Certainly you agree that the homeless have rights, so if they chose not go to a facility there should be nothing that the federal government could do about it. And whatever damage that those purely a life choice people are doing to communities there should be city ordinances to deal with it.It was a general comment. Here's one I've been involved in in the past
They are built specifically to be moved and they are being tossed to the side. Pick up for free and pay for shipping and then mod them as needed.
Honestly, I could see an entire industry putting people ( homeless?) to work retrofitting the containers for the homeless population in the US......one stone, two birds.
I'm fine with that. As long as it's voluntary.
Will you lit a finger regardless?
Your opinion is worthless. You literally dont give the first **** about those people or their situation. They can die in the ****ing street for all you care. To you they are just another 'thing' to **** yourself over TRUUUUUUUMMMPPP!!! about.
Great question. Annually we provide meals to on average 45 families for Thanksgiving and Christmas through the organization that I am the director of. I work OCCASIONALLY...not often..at a shelter. I have taken in my wifes family members...including people with chronic illness. I have held the hand of a niece as she made the most important decision of her life and loved her before and after...even when I didnt agree with her decision. BUT...how many homeless people have a I brought into my home?
None.
But then...I'm not an idiot leftist ****ting myself because a politician I hate is looking at solutions to solve a humanitarian crisis...now am I?
The problem is nobody is sure if he actually cares or just wants a photo op.
I suspect a private prison solution is in the offing.
They contribute lavishly.
Well that's about as wrong as it can be. But I hope your spleen feels better now.
Standing reservations at a Trump resort is really all it takes.