• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:249]CNN Caught Lying Again. No Surprise Here

Condor060

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
May 28, 2019
Messages
12,956
Reaction score
3,295
Location
Charlotte
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
CNN Reports

Washington (CNN)In a previously undisclosed secret mission in 2017, the United States successfully extracted from Russia one of its highest-level covert sources inside the Russian government, multiple Trump administration officials with direct knowledge told CNN.

A person directly involved in the discussions said that the removal of the Russian was driven, in part, by concerns that President Donald Trump and his administration repeatedly mishandled classified intelligence and could contribute to exposing the covert source as a spy.

Exclusive: US extracted top spy from inside Russia in 2017 - CNNPolitics

Yet another anonymous, Insider, and a person directly involved in the discussions reported by CNN is AGAIN, FAKE NEWS.

The CIA slams CNN about their Fake News.

Misguided speculation that the Presidents handling of our nations most sensitive intelligence (Which he has access to each and every day) drove an alleged exfiltration operation is inaccurate.

New York Times reported that former Intelligence Officals stated there was no evidence that Trump directly endangered the source and other current American Officials insisted that media scrutiny of the agency's sources alone was the impetus for the extraction.
 
Last edited:
Maybe im being cynical, but i have come to the conclusion that these organazations are using the term "anyomous sources" to hide behind, as a license to fabricate whatever they want with impunity. It happems far to often and is relied on far to frequently to explain away as either incompetency or innocent mistakes. CNN and othr3s are guility of using the tenants of a free press to perputrate hoaxes.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
CNN Reports



Exclusive: US extracted top spy from inside Russia in 2017 - CNNPolitics

Yet another anonymous, Insider, and a person directly involved in the discussions reported by CNN is AGAIN, FAKE NEWS.

The CIA slams CNN about their Fake News.

So you're now defending the intelligence services whom Trump decided were not to be trusted, because he preferred to believe Putin? Wasn't 'Deep Throat' anonymous? Didn't work out too well for Nixon did it?

The Pattern and Practice of Trump’s Assaults on the Intelligence Community
 
So you're now defending the intelligence services whom Trump decided were not to be trusted, because he preferred to believe Putin? Wasn't 'Deep Throat' anonymous? Didn't work out too well for Nixon did it?

Nope, Just exposing CNN for what they are. Lying Fake News. Read into it what ever you want.
 
Maybe im being cynical, but i have come to the conclusion that these organazations are using the term "anyomous sources" to hide behind, as a license to fabricate whatever they want with impunity. It happems far to often and is relied on far to frequently to explain away as either incompetency or innocent mistakes. CNN and othr3s are guility of using the tenants of a free press to perputrate hoaxes.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Seems that there are literally thousands of undisclosed, anonymous, insider, sources being used to propagate fake news these days. Its in a report about Trump every day.

You would think after becoming the lowest rated cable news provider in the country, you might try a different tactic but when its all you have, I guess you run the fake stuff.
 
CNN Reports



Exclusive: US extracted top spy from inside Russia in 2017 - CNNPolitics

Yet another anonymous, Insider, and a person directly involved in the discussions reported by CNN is AGAIN, FAKE NEWS.

The CIA slams CNN about their Fake News.



New York Times reported that former Intelligence Officals stated there was no evidence that Trump directly endangered the source and other current American Officials insisted that media scrutiny of the agency's sources alone was the impetus for the extraction.

Setting the bar low for “slams,” aren’t you.

slams=/inaccurate?
 
I find it odd that the CIA is tacitly admitting they had a source close to high ranking Russian officials to begin with.
 
Setting the bar low for “slams,” aren’t you.

slams=/inaccurate?

Misguided speculation that the Presidents handling of our nations most sensitive intelligence (Which he has access to each and every day) drove an alleged exfiltration operation is inaccurate.

I noticed you conveniently left the CIA's part out.

Setting the bar low? I don't think so
 
CNN Reports



Exclusive: US extracted top spy from inside Russia in 2017 - CNNPolitics

Yet another anonymous, Insider, and a person directly involved in the discussions reported by CNN is AGAIN, FAKE NEWS.

The CIA slams CNN about their Fake News.



New York Times reported that former Intelligence Officals stated there was no evidence that Trump directly endangered the source and other current American Officials insisted that media scrutiny of the agency's sources alone was the impetus for the extraction.

CNN has gone full leftwing. They are rated on the extreme left of the scale of all media outlets.
Left Bias - Media Bias/Fact Check
 
Misguided speculation that the Presidents handling of our nations most sensitive intelligence (Which he has access to each and every day) drove an alleged exfiltration operation is inaccurate.

I noticed you conveniently left the CIA's part out.

Setting the bar low? I don't think so

My post stands. Calling a news story “inaccurate” is hardly a slam.
 
My post stands. Calling a news story “inaccurate” is hardly a slam.

Of course you would, unless it was about Trump. We all get it. The fact that CNN knowingly falsified this report and made up an anonymous source has no affect on you.
 
Of course you would, unless it was about Trump. We all get it. The fact that CNN knowingly falsified this report and made up an anonymous source has no affect on you.

Must be a conspiracy, as there are more than one source reporting this. You have proof that “CNN knowingly falsified this report and made up an anonymous source?”
 
Must be a conspiracy, as there are more than one source reporting this

You mean like the identical regurgitated story word for word all stating (CNN reports)

You have proof that “CNN knowingly falsified this report and made up an anonymous source?”

Yeah, you mean like the statement from the CIA and New York Times. .
 
My post stands. Calling a news story “inaccurate” is hardly a slam.

Ok, is this better: erroneous, false, incorrect, inexact, invalid, off, unsound, untrue, untruthful, wrong
 
Ok, is this better: erroneous, false, incorrect, inexact, invalid, off, unsound, untrue, untruthful, wrong

Got any sources other that Roget’s?
 
CNN Reports



Exclusive: US extracted top spy from inside Russia in 2017 - CNNPolitics

Yet another anonymous, Insider, and a person directly involved in the discussions reported by CNN is AGAIN, FAKE NEWS.

The CIA slams CNN about their Fake News.



New York Times reported that former Intelligence Officals stated there was no evidence that Trump directly endangered the source and other current American Officials insisted that media scrutiny of the agency's sources alone was the impetus for the extraction.

What exactly was the LIE?
 
It's still being reported this morning and that person is living openly using his own name in washington.

But hey, you guys are more than willing to believe hillary was running a sex ring out of a pizza parlor. Does any more need to be said?
 
Once more: Must be a conspiracy, as there are more than one source reporting this. You have proof that “CNN knowingly falsified this report and made up an anonymous source?”

This NYT story?

C.I.A. Informant Extracted From Russia Had Sent Secrets to U.S. for Decades - The New York Times

CIA statement in direct regards to CNN's story

CNN's narrative that the Central Intelligence Agency makes life or death decisions based on anything other than objective analysis and sound collection is simply false.

Misguided speculation that the President's handling of our nations most sensitive intelligence (which he has access to each and every day) drove an alleged exfiltration operation is inaccurate.

Hows that work for ya.
 
Of course you would, unless it was about Trump. We all get it. The fact that CNN knowingly falsified this report and made up an anonymous source has no affect on you.

And you know this...how?
 
And you know this...how?

CIA statement in direct regards to CNN's story

CNN's narrative that the Central Intelligence Agency makes life or death decisions based on anything other than objective analysis and sound collection is simply false.

Misguided speculation that the President's handling of our nations most sensitive intelligence (which he has access to each and every day) drove an alleged exfiltration operation is inaccurate.
 
So you're now defending the intelligence services whom Trump decided were not to be trusted, because he preferred to believe Putin? Wasn't 'Deep Throat' anonymous? Didn't work out too well for Nixon did it?

The Pattern and Practice of Trump’s Assaults on the Intelligence Community

th
 
Back
Top Bottom