- Joined
- Feb 12, 2013
- Messages
- 160,900
- Reaction score
- 57,844
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Back in the 90's Francis Fukuyama wrote a book, arrogantly titled "The End of History." The premise: liberal democracy would be the panacea, the end-all predominant system geared to to replace all previous forms of government. And, it would soon sweep the world.
lol...thirty years later, a new theory emerges. And, it is far less Pollyannish.
Hard to argue against the obvious, IMO.
lol...thirty years later, a new theory emerges. And, it is far less Pollyannish.
Democracy is hard work. And as society’s “elites”—experts and public figures who help those around them navigate the heavy responsibilities that come with self-rule—have increasingly been sidelined, citizens have proved ill equipped cognitively and emotionally to run a well-functioning democracy. As a consequence, the center has collapsed and millions of frustrated and angst-filled voters have turned in desperation to right-wing populists.
His prediction? “In well-established democracies like the United States, democratic governance will continue its inexorable decline and will eventually fail.”
The Shocking Paper Predicting the End of Democracy - POLITICO Magazine
Hard to argue against the obvious, IMO.
Citing reams of psychological research, findings that by now have become more or less familiar, Rosenberg makes his case that human beings don’t think straight. Biases of various kinds skew our brains at the most fundamental level. For example, racism is easily triggered unconsciously in whites by a picture of a black man wearing a hoodie. We discount evidence when it doesn’t square up with our goals while we embrace information that confirms our biases. Sometimes hearing we’re wrong makes us double down. And so on and so forth.
Last edited: