• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who wants to buy a country?

Talk about buying Greenland have been going on for decades by more than one country. Immediately after WWII the US gave serious thought to the idea and a dollar amount based on gold bullion was floated.

How many times does a bad idea need to be shot down before certain people finally get the message?
 
Of course, that is a lie. The President said only that the reply from Denmark was nasty.

Without lies, I'm not sure what the left would be able to post.

They lie about Greenland, and pretend such an idea has never been considered, they lie about what the President said...

It just goes on and on, and then they freak out when they are called on it.

The Prime Minister said the idea was absurd. Trump said that response was nasty and then he cancelled his audience with the Queen of Denmark. The guy's a whiny little snowflake. He blatantly insulted a whole country, Greenland, and then got all butthurt about a pretty mild negative response. What if he wanted to buy New Zealand, would he make an offer to Queen Elizabeth?
 
How? Putin doesn't need Greenland. He has enormous natural resources.

have you ever heard of a strategic asset?

Putin would also bring plenty of new jobs to greenland...

ICBM maintenance personnel, listening post crews, etc, etc....
 
How many times does a bad idea need to be shot down before certain people finally get the message?

Actually, it's not a bad idea. That's why a number of countries have been talking about it for a long time.

I recognize the desire to look into that is absent when another in the never ending dump of liberal propaganda against the President is involved.
 
How many times does a bad idea need to be shot down before certain people finally get the message?

Worked out pretty well for the Louisiana Purchase and Alaska, or are you going to hate on that too?
 
Someone might object:

"Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith." (Royal Style and Titles Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. R-12))

Maybe she would not object if someone were going to buy Australia.
 
Back
Top Bottom