• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Anthony Scaramucci says he's putting together coalition to stop Trump in 2020

Crosscheck

Crosscheck

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
12,008
Reaction score
9,396
Location
NW USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Anthony Scaramucci, a former White House communications director who has recently withdrawn his support for President Donald Trump, said Monday that he is putting together a coalition of former Trump Cabinet officials to denounce the President ahead of the 2020 election. "I'm in the process of putting together a team of people that feel the exact same way that I do. This is not a 'Never Trump' situation. This not just screeching rhetoric. This is -- OK, the guy is unstable. Everyone inside knows it, everyone outside knows it. Let's see if we can find a viable alternative," Scaramucci told CNN's Alisyn Camerota on "New Day." ​
Click to expand...


What is it with Trump's team that they continually turn on each other? It will be interesting to see who he has on his team. Trump has burned quite a few bridges.




Anthony Scaramucci says he's putting together coalition to stop Trump in 2020
 
Crosscheck said:
What is it with Trump's team that they continually turn on each other?
Click to expand...
It's because he hires the best people. lol...

The problems are:

• Trump's idea of loyalty is almost entirely one-way. He demands loyalty, but offers none in return.

• Trump's demands for loyalty are extreme; even the tiniest criticism, offered in good faith, is interpreted as an attack.

• Trump is almost entirely transactional in nature.

• Trump doesn't care about fairness (except as a cudgel to attack his enemies). He always wants those transactions to favor him.

As a result, people are loyal to him only as long as it is in their own self-interest. Once it is no longer in their interests to work with him, or they see it in their interests to turn on him (e.g. Scaramucci, Manigault etc), they'll turn on him.
 
Visbek said:
It's because he hires the best people. lol...

The problems are:

• Trump's idea of loyalty is almost entirely one-way. He demands loyalty, but offers none in return.

• Trump's demands for loyalty are extreme; even the tiniest criticism, offered in good faith, is interpreted as an attack.

• Trump is almost entirely transactional in nature.

• Trump doesn't care about fairness (except as a cudgel to attack his enemies). He always wants those transactions to favor him.

As a result, people are loyal to him only as long as it is in their own self-interest. Once it is no longer in their interests to work with him, or they see it in their interests to turn on him (e.g. Scaramucci, Manigault etc), they'll turn on him.
Click to expand...

So much for the old cliché Honor Among Thieves.

Or perhaps Trump just sucks at evaluating people and perhaps wives too.
 
trixare4kids said:
All the above proves is that Trump's instincts about Scaramucci not being fit for a WH job were on the mark.
Wonder who this guy thinks he is anyway?
Click to expand...

Trump hired him? So much for those great instincts.
 
trixare4kids said:
All the above proves is that Trump's instincts about Scaramucci not being fit for a WH job were on the mark.
Wonder who this guy thinks he is anyway?
Click to expand...

He is someone who witnessed first hand that saw what most of us were always aware of.

Trump is installed and has no business being in the Whitehouse...
 
Crosscheck said:
What is it with Trump's team that they continually turn on each other? It will be interesting to see who he has on his team. Trump has burned quite a few bridges.

Anthony Scaramucci says he's putting together coalition to stop Trump in 2020
Click to expand...


I guess his glowing revue about Trump a year ago didn't garner him the position he wanted ... :lol:


scaramucci.jpg
 
trixare4kids said:
All the above proves is that Trump's instincts about Scaramucci not being fit for a WH job were on the mark.
Wonder who this guy thinks he is anyway?
Click to expand...

Maybe he should have trusted that instinct becore hiring the Mooch in the first place.
 
Barnacle said:
I guess his glowing revue about Trump a year ago didn't garner him the position he wanted ... :lol:


scaramucci.jpg
Click to expand...

Exactly, what kind of moron would of hired this loose cannon?
 
Visbek said:
It's because he hires the best people. lol...

The problems are:

• Trump's idea of loyalty is almost entirely one-way. He demands loyalty, but offers none in return.

• Trump's demands for loyalty are extreme; even the tiniest criticism, offered in good faith, is interpreted as an attack.

• Trump is almost entirely transactional in nature.

• Trump doesn't care about fairness (except as a cudgel to attack his enemies). He always wants those transactions to favor him.

As a result, people are loyal to him only as long as it is in their own self-interest. Once it is no longer in their interests to work with him, or they see it in their interests to turn on him (e.g. Scaramucci, Manigault etc), they'll turn on him.
Click to expand...

Basically, he hires people just like him whose loyalty only extends to "what can I get out of this"
 
Crosscheck said:
So much for the old cliché Honor Among Thieves.

Or perhaps Trump just sucks at evaluating people and perhaps wives too.
Click to expand...

He only buys the best mail order wives Putin has to offer.

Someone has to to keep an eye on his investment...
 
trixare4kids said:
All the above proves is that Trump's instincts about Scaramucci not being fit for a WH job were on the mark.
Wonder who this guy thinks he is anyway?
Click to expand...

I wouldn't exactly call this instincts. Trump gave him a job and then had to fire him for his unprofessional behavior. Maybe Trump should actually start putting an effort in and vetting his hires. Cause right now it's very apparent that he literally couldn't care less. He puts in no effort at all.
 
trixare4kids said:
All the above proves is that Trump's instincts about Scaramucci not being fit for a WH job were on the mark.
Wonder who this guy thinks he is anyway?
Click to expand...

Ummmm... trump's the one who brought the mooch in to the WH in the first place. How many of trump's campaign staff, WH and cabinet appointments have had to resign, get fired, or have been put in prison now? Are you willing to admit that trump doesn't pick the best people? (I won't hold my breath:) )
 
Show of hands - who here truly believes that if Trump called him back for a position within his administration, Scaramucci would be beating down the doors to get back in?

*raises hand*

Scaramucci is anybody’s dog that’ll hunt. He’s a pathetic opportunist who shouldn’t be taken seriously.
 
roughdraft274 said:
I wouldn't exactly call this instincts. Trump gave him a job and then had to fire him for his unprofessional behavior. Maybe Trump should actually start putting an effort in and vetting his hires. Cause right now it's very apparent that he literally couldn't care less. He puts in no effort at all.
Click to expand...

trump's vetting process:

1. How good do they look on TV and/or:
2. How much will their hire or appointment piss of the libs

That's it!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom