• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Freedom is NOT enough. We need Fundamental Economic Rights.

Coughi

New member
Joined
Aug 10, 2019
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Progressive
What is Freedom?

Far too often I've felt like us as a society have discussed freedom in the constraints of wealth. It's common how we talk about the property rights of rich landowners to do as they please, or for corporations to be free from regulation. However, when we talk about freedom in regards to those empoverished, we often use the notion that availability is simply enough. People will argue that the working-class people in our society have the freedom to purchase food, healthcare, clean water, housing, the freedom to get a job, etc. and that their lack of acquiring these essentials, is a result of their blatant inability. In general, we often don't talk about barrier of entries that most of our freedoms require.

For instance, one must have a certain skill, or have access to capital to purchase food, healthcare, clean water, housing, etc. One must have access to housing or have gained some skill in their childhood or through their education to obtain a valuable job that will pay them to provide for their needs. And that's the thing, the things mentioned above are literal necessities that are essential to the human condition. In other words, having food, healthcare, clean water, housing, a job, wifi, and etc. are all fundamental for an individual to maintain their life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.

How can a homeless person possibly recover and obtain a job without help from an outside source? How can a person born to a disadvantaged household where they don't have access to clean water or a high functioning education system acquire the skills he or she needs to further his or her life? Or, how can a single mother raise her child if she comes down with a health condition and doesn't have the healthcare to pay for it?

Far too often, we demonize the individual and their circumstances without considering the circumstances that led to the creation of that individual. If you are born into poverty, you are at a massive disadvantage and your ability to achieve socioeconomic mobility is insanely impaired to that of a wealthy or middle-classer. Then combine that with the compounding negative effects that occur when one is deprived of essential human necessities and ask yourself: Are we doing enough to help those in need??

Simply put, we are not. The United States of America is the most powerful country in the world and so we should be able to do better for our citizens. We should be able to guarantee a high quality of living for every individual within our society by granting everyone the right to housing, food, clean water, healthcare, education, wifi, a job, etc. One shouldn't have barriers that would inhibit one from success. Instead, if you live here, you should be given every opportunity to succeed.
 
So.....what are you proposing?

Legislate prosperity and success?
 
If one is given everything that they need then work (of any kind) is simply an option.
 
What is Freedom?

Far too often I've felt like us as a society have discussed freedom in the constraints of wealth. It's common how we talk about the property rights of rich landowners to do as they please, or for corporations to be free from regulation. However, when we talk about freedom in regards to those empoverished, we often use the notion that availability is simply enough. People will argue that the working-class people in our society have the freedom to purchase food, healthcare, clean water, housing, the freedom to get a job, etc. and that their lack of acquiring these essentials, is a result of their blatant inability. In general, we often don't talk about barrier of entries that most of our freedoms require.

For instance, one must have a certain skill, or have access to capital to purchase food, healthcare, clean water, housing, etc. One must have access to housing or have gained some skill in their childhood or through their education to obtain a valuable job that will pay them to provide for their needs. And that's the thing, the things mentioned above are literal necessities that are essential to the human condition. In other words, having food, healthcare, clean water, housing, a job, wifi, and etc. are all fundamental for an individual to maintain their life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.

How can a homeless person possibly recover and obtain a job without help from an outside source? How can a person born to a disadvantaged household where they don't have access to clean water or a high functioning education system acquire the skills he or she needs to further his or her life? Or, how can a single mother raise her child if she comes down with a health condition and doesn't have the healthcare to pay for it?

Far too often, we demonize the individual and their circumstances without considering the circumstances that led to the creation of that individual. If you are born into poverty, you are at a massive disadvantage and your ability to achieve socioeconomic mobility is insanely impaired to that of a wealthy or middle-classer. Then combine that with the compounding negative effects that occur when one is deprived of essential human necessities and ask yourself: Are we doing enough to help those in need??

Simply put, we are not. The United States of America is the most powerful country in the world and so we should be able to do better for our citizens. We should be able to guarantee a high quality of living for every individual within our society by granting everyone the right to housing, food, clean water, healthcare, education, wifi, a job, etc. One shouldn't have barriers that would inhibit one from success. Instead, if you live here, you should be given every opportunity to succeed.

A person can do like my family did. We worked for it.
 
What is Freedom?How can a homeless person possibly recover and obtain a job without help from an outside source?

The same way illegals, who often arrive with nothing but the clothes on their backs, have done it for decades: Show up outside of a Home Depot early in the morning. But a significant majority of homeless people have issues with substance abuse. They won't quit until they want to quit. Sometimes that's never. Another fraction, maybe as high as 30%, suffer from some sort of mental illness and are largely unemployable. Liberals prefer they be "free" instead of in an inpatient mental hospital where they could receive treatment. I read the other day that there are about 1,000,000 seriously mentally ill people in this country who are among the general populace and are NOT receiving treatment. And we wonder why we have chaos in our cities?
 
The America views "work ethic" is downright appalling and stupid. I'd much rather work to live than live to work.

The former is character-building. The latter is a ****ing nightmare. How would it feel if someone told you your only worth is cheap labor, not even a full-fledged human being really, just an organic machine or tool to be used and discarded like a ****ING OBJECT.
 
Last edited:
If I may be permitted to simplify the OP, it appears to be a plea for assistance to the needy. To that end, there's quite a bit that we can do in these United States of America.

One example is our system of dealing with law-breakers. It tends to be exemplified by the Trumpist chant of 'Lock her up!'. We can do well to look at the recidivism rate, compare it to that of Norway, and make effective changes.

Another is our health care system. Ours is often noted as being the most expensive in the world, with less than stellar results. A different way to look at health care is to look at both the medical system and our public assistance programs that affect health combined. Seen this way, our expenditures per person are in the same range as other developed 'democracies'*. We should carefully look at our ratio of expenditures and consider a re-adjustment.

Both of those suggestions, and there are many more, will help those who are disadvantaged to regain their footing.

* The use of 'democracies' is to forestall someone from pointing out to me that the United States of America is a republic. I know that, thank you.
 
The United States of America is the most powerful country in the world and so we should be able to do better for our citizens. We should be able to guarantee a high quality of living for every individual within our society by granting everyone the right to housing, food, clean water, healthcare, education, wifi, a job, etc.
Why not also gas and electric power, a personal vehicle, air travel, 2,500 sq. ft. of personal living space, childcare, housekeeping services, air conditioning, a four-day workweek, and a daily allowance? Why should the citizens of the most powerful country in the world not also have the right to these things?

What I'm asking is: where are you getting these "rights" from?

Do these "rights" come with any responsibilities attached?
 
What is Freedom?

Far too often I've felt like us as a society have discussed freedom in the constraints of wealth. It's common how we talk about the property rights of rich landowners to do as they please, or for corporations to be free from regulation. However, when we talk about freedom in regards to those empoverished, we often use the notion that availability is simply enough. People will argue that the working-class people in our society have the freedom to purchase food, healthcare, clean water, housing, the freedom to get a job, etc. and that their lack of acquiring these essentials, is a result of their blatant inability. In general, we often don't talk about barrier of entries that most of our freedoms require.

For instance, one must have a certain skill, or have access to capital to purchase food, healthcare, clean water, housing, etc. One must have access to housing or have gained some skill in their childhood or through their education to obtain a valuable job that will pay them to provide for their needs. And that's the thing, the things mentioned above are literal necessities that are essential to the human condition. In other words, having food, healthcare, clean water, housing, a job, wifi, and etc. are all fundamental for an individual to maintain their life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.

How can a homeless person possibly recover and obtain a job without help from an outside source? How can a person born to a disadvantaged household where they don't have access to clean water or a high functioning education system acquire the skills he or she needs to further his or her life? Or, how can a single mother raise her child if she comes down with a health condition and doesn't have the healthcare to pay for it?

Far too often, we demonize the individual and their circumstances without considering the circumstances that led to the creation of that individual. If you are born into poverty, you are at a massive disadvantage and your ability to achieve socioeconomic mobility is insanely impaired to that of a wealthy or middle-classer. Then combine that with the compounding negative effects that occur when one is deprived of essential human necessities and ask yourself: Are we doing enough to help those in need??

Simply put, we are not. The United States of America is the most powerful country in the world and so we should be able to do better for our citizens. We should be able to guarantee a high quality of living for every individual within our society by granting everyone the right to housing, food, clean water, healthcare, education, wifi, a job, etc. One shouldn't have barriers that would inhibit one from success. Instead, if you live here, you should be given every opportunity to succeed.

Simply put, we are not. The United States of America is the most powerful country in the world and so we should be able to do better for our citizens. We should be able to guarantee a high quality of living for every individual within our society by granting everyone the right to housing, food, clean water, healthcare, education, wifi, a job, etc.

(LOL)

We have spent TRILLION's on LBJ's "Great society "
 
President Franklin Roosevelt called for a second, economic bill of rights, saying that freedom has a need for prosperity.

9e2b3a040016234aa5769ec97326e68b.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom