• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Trump has unleashed a torrent of hatred

veritas1 said:
What the hell do you think conspiring and coordinating amounts to? Parsing words won't change anything.

col·lu·sion
/kəˈlo͞oZHən/

noun
secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others
Click to expand...


1. Mueller Report:
"we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of"collusion."" Vol 1, Page 2


2." secret or illegal cooperation": From your own definition. They investigated potential criminal conduct not "non-criminal" accusations.


How can you get such basic facts things, so wrong? Is it lying or does someone just have to be an idiot?
 
Mach said:
1. Mueller Report:
"we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of"collusion."" Vol 1, Page 2


2." secret or illegal cooperation": From your own definition. They investigated potential criminal conduct not "non-criminal" accusations.


How can you get such basic facts things, so wrong? Is it lying or does someone just have to be an idiot?
Click to expand...

Simple: extreme rightwing ideology compels them to do so and being pathological liars to begin with makes it easy.
 
Last edited:
trouble13 said:
Im embarassed for you (@ your post)

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I'm laughing at you. You just earned an F on spelling, to boot. You people never fail to fail.
 
digitusmedius said:
Wow, you people just can't help stepping in your own ****. In fact, the report cites dozens of cases of "coordination and cooperation" between Shtbag's shtbags and the Russians.
Click to expand...

You uninformed or dishonest to the bone?

“the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.” I'll give your intellect the benefit of the doubt and assume you lie.
 
dixon01767 said:
You uninformed or dishonest to the bone?

“the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.” I'll give your intellect the benefit of the doubt and assume you lie.
Click to expand...

I'm so glad you people never bother to actually read anything and just jump right to the lying. It makes it so easy to call your bull****tery out.
 
digitusmedius said:
If you want to call those words collusion that's fine with me but it kicks the legs out of your and Shtibag's claim that there was "no collusion." I hope you're not a defense lawyer because what you just did was call your own client (i.e., ****bag) guilty of collusion.
Click to expand...

Hilarious. No conspiracy, no cooperation, no collusion. The game is over but one side wants to keep playing, unable to admit their defeat.
 
Mach said:
1. Mueller Report:
"we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of"collusion."" Vol 1, Page 2


2." secret or illegal cooperation": From your own definition. They investigated potential criminal conduct not "non-criminal" accusations.


How can you get such basic facts things, so wrong? Is it lying or does someone just have to be an idiot?
Click to expand...

Collusion is not a legal term but that is the what the left has accused Trump of for 2+ years. Now, they want to run away from it while taking shelter behind "conspiracy and cooperation". Of course, those weren't found by Mueller either and, if collusion happened, it would require conspiracy and cooperation. Your buddy digitusmedius keeps saying collusion was found so maybe your loudmouthed attacks should be directed to him instead of to me.
 
digitusmedius said:
I'm so glad you people never bother to actually read anything and just jump right to the lying. It makes it so easy to call your bull****tery out.
Click to expand...

That quote is directly from the report. Read it again:

“the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

That's unequivocal and final. Game over.
 
veritas1 said:
Collusion is not a legal term but that is the what the left has accused Trump of for 2+ years. Now, they want to run away from it while taking shelter behind "conspiracy and cooperation". Of course, those weren't found by Mueller either and, if collusion happened, it would require conspiracy and cooperation. Your buddy digitusmedius keeps saying collusion was found so maybe your loudmouthed attacks should be directed to him instead of to me.
Click to expand...

Take your correction like an adult.

You were wrong.
You were corrected.
You protest with whimpering.
 
Mach said:
Take your correction like an adult.

You were wrong.
You were corrected.
You protest with whimpering.
Click to expand...

Hilarious. You've been dismissed, both by me and, more importantly, the Mueller Report. Now, run along.
 
veritas1 said:
Hilarious. You've been dismissed, both by me and, more importantly, the Mueller Report. Now, run along.
Click to expand...
Mueller's report contradicts what you wrote, I even increased the size to maximum so you could see it. Why do you protest?
 
Mach said:
Mueller's report contradicts what you wrote, I even increased the size to maximum so you could see it. Why do you protest?
Click to expand...

I refer you to post #135. Game over.
 
NeverTrump said:
Did you see Mark Levin said Mueller has Dementia??? I think it's more like Trump does!
Click to expand...

I honestly think that Mueller's seemingly diminished faculties might have resulted, at least in part, from the stress of conducting the investigation.
It seems to have drained him.
 
haymarket said:
Trumpkins are True Believers. And it is in the essential nature of any True Believer to demand total and complete mindless obedience with the program. You can march shoulder to shoulder with them for 999 straight days but if you disagree with them and march a different way on day 1,000 then you are cast out and placed in the category of the Heretic just like all the other they battled for those previous 999 days.
Click to expand...

Textbook characteristic of cult behavior.
See: SCIENTOLOGY.
 
Lutherf said:
That's rather straightforward.

First, here's the "Go Back" tweet(s) in their entirety - Trump’s racist tweets telling four Democrats to “go back,” explained - Vox




If you read the whole thing it's rather obvious that Trump is complaining about the "squad" ranting and raving about how bad America is while ignoring far worse issues in their homeland or the homeland of their immediate ancestors.
Click to expand...

Why should three people born and raised HERE be required to return to a land they never knew?
Why should a naturalized citizen be required to leave?
Why are American citizens told not to criticize their homeland?
What it boils down to, is that Trump demands that everyone love America (and most of all: HIM)
"the way a four year old loves his Mommy."

So even if one were to remove all references to race, we're left with "If you don't like it here, leave.", to which the only legitimate patriotic answer is

"**** you, how about YOU leave instead? I am an American and have the right to criticize my country, and as an elected representative it is my JOB to help decide how our government is to be run. I don't require your approval to speak and you have neither the right nor invitation to tell me where to go."

Trump's Tweets are considered official government communications, and the content of his Twitter vendetta might just meet the legal definition of a government penalty against a private citizen if he continues to up the ante.
He is not speaking as a private citizen. He is speaking in his official government capacity as President, the Chief Executive.

Perhaps Mr. Trump should consider putting down his Twitter-phone NOW before it is too late.

“We love America just as much as they do. But in a different way. You see, they love America like a 4-year-old loves his mommy. Liberals love America like grown-ups. To a 4-year-old, everything Mommy does is wonderful and anyone who criticizes Mommy is bad. Grown-up love means actually understanding what you love, taking the good with the bad and helping your loved one grow.”
Click to expand...
----AL FRANKEN
 
veritas1 said:
Collusion is not a legal term but that is the what the left has accused Trump of for 2+ years.¹ Now, they want to run away from it while taking shelter behind "conspiracy and cooperation".² Of course, those weren't found by Mueller either and, if collusion happened, it would require conspiracy and cooperation.³ Your buddy digitusmedius keeps saying collusion was found so maybe your loudmouthed attacks should be directed to him instead of to me.⁴
Click to expand...

Let's count the lies (annotated) in that comment:
1. The "left" has not been accusing ****bag of collusion but something worse (see 2. below). But ****bag has been denying collusion for 2+ years.
2. In fact, Mueller found dozens of incidents of "coordination and cooperation" but falling short of the required elements for conspiracy. Apparently he concluded that everyone involved was too stupid to realize what they were doing. IOW, Mueller gave them a big pass.
3. Since collusion is not a legally recognized term, it's impossible for it to require "conspiracy and cooperation" to establish it. Veri, baby, you are really confused.
4. "digitusmedius" has never claimed "collusion was found" but just the opposite in pointing out time and again there is no such legal entity called "collusion." We realize you have to dirty up the water as much as possible to keep your BS alive but it's so obvious and desperate now that you're just making a bigger fool of yourself every time you do it.
 
digitusmedius said:
Let's count the lies (annotated) in that comment:
1. The "left" has not been accusing ****bag of collusion but something worse (see 2. below). But ****bag has been denying collusion for 2+ years.
2. In fact, Mueller found dozens of incidents of "coordination and cooperation" but falling short of the required elements for conspiracy. Apparently he concluded that everyone involved was too stupid to realize what they were doing. IOW, Mueller gave them a big pass.
3. Since collusion is not a legally recognized term, it's impossible for it to require "conspiracy and cooperation" to establish it. Veri, baby, you are really confused.
4. "digitusmedius" has never claimed "collusion was found" but just the opposite in pointing out time and again there is no such legal entity called "collusion." We realize you have to dirty up the water as much as possible to keep your BS alive but it's so obvious and desperate now that you're just making a bigger fool of yourself every time you do it.
Click to expand...

Basic English escapes you. I gave you the definition of collusion. You can go through all the contortions you want. Call it collusion, coordination, or conspiracy. Mueller found NONE of them. Game over.
 
veritas1 said:
What the hell do you think conspiring and coordinating amounts to? Parsing words won't change anything.

col·lu·sion
/kəˈlo͞oZHən/

noun
secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others
Click to expand...

Sounds like the Trump Foundation and Trump 'University'.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom